Authors: Philip Roth
administration does not intend to sit idly by and do
nothing while American women are being kicked in
the stomach by a bunch of violent five-month-olds.
Now by and large, and I cannot emphasize this
enough, our American unborn are as wonderful a
group of unborn as you can find anywhere. But
there are these violent few
that the Vice President has characterized, and I
don't think unjustly, in his own impassioned
rhetoric, as "troublemakers" and "malcontents" and
the Attorney General has been instructed by
me to take the appropriate action against them.
MR
.
DARING:
If I may, sir, what sort of action
will that be? Will there be arrests made of
14
OUR GANG
violent fetuses? And if so, how exactly will this be
carried out?
TRICKY:
I think I can safely say, Mr. Daring, that we
have the finest law enforcement agencies in the
world. I am quite sure that Attorney General
Malicious can solve whatever procedural problems
may arise. Mr. Respectful.
MR. RESPECTFUL:
Mr. President, with all the
grave national and international problems that
press continually upon you, can you tell us why you
have decided to devote yourself to this previously
neglected issue of fetal rights? You seem pretty fired
up on this issue, sir-why is that?
TRICKY:
Because,
Mr. Respectful, I will not tolerate injustice in any
area of our national life. Because ours is a just
society, not merely for the rich and the privileged,
but for the most powerless among us as well. You
know, you hear a lot these days about Black Power
and Female Power, Power this and Power that. But
what about Prenatal Power? Don't they have rights
too, membranes though they may be? I for one
think they do, and I intend to fight for them. Mr.
Shrewd.
MR. SHREWD:
As you must know, Mr. President,
there are those who contend that you are guided in
this matter solely by political considerations. Can
you comment on that?
TRICKY:
Well, Mr. Shrewd, I suppose that is their
cynical way of describing my plan to intro
TRICKY HOLDS A PRESS CONFERENCE 15
duce a proposed constitutional amendment that
would extend the vote to the unborn in time for
the
'72
elections.
MR. SHREWD:
I believe that is what they have in
mind, sir. They contend that by extending the vote
to the unborn you will neutralize the gains that may
accrue to the Democratic Party by the voting age
having been lowered to eighteen. They say your
strategists have concluded that even if you should
lose the eighteen-to-twentyone-year-old vote, you
can still win a second term if you are able to carry
the South, the state of California, and the embryos
and fetuses from coast to coast. Is there any truth to
this "political" analysis of your sudden interest in
Prenatal Power?
TRICKY:
Mr. Shrewd, I'd like to leave that to you-and
to our television viewers-to judge, by answering
your question in a somewhat personal manner. I
assure you I am conversant with the opinions of the
experts. Many of them are men whom I respect, and
surely they have the right to say whatever they like,
though of course one always hopes it will be in the
national interest ... But let me remind you, and all
Americans, because this is a fact that seems
somehow to have been overlooked in this whole
debate: I am no Johnny-come-lately to the problem
of the rights of the unborn. The simple fact of the
matter, and it is in the record for all to see, is
16 OUR GANG
that I myself was once unborn, in the great state of
California. Of course, you wouldn't always know
this from what you see on television or read in the
papers (impish endearing smile) that some of you
gentlemen write for, but it happens
nonetheless to be the truth.
(Back to
serious
business) I was an unborn Quaker, as a matter of
fact.
And let me remind you-since it seems necessary
to do
so,
in the face of the vicious and mindless
attacks upon him-Vice President What's-his-name
was also unborn once, an unborn Greek-American,
and proud to have been one. We were just talking
about that this morning, how he was once an
unborn GreekAmerican, and all that has meant to
him. And so too was Secretary Lard unborn and so
was Secretary Codger unborn, and the Attorney
Generalwhy, I could go right on down through my
cabinet and point out to you one fine man after
another
who
was once unborn. Even Secretary
Fickle, with whom as you know I had my differences
of opinion, was unborn when he was here
with us on the team.
And if you look among the leadership of the
Republican Party in the House and the Senate, you
will find men who long before their election to
public office were unborn in just about every
region of this country, on farms, in industrial cities,
in small towns the length and breadth of
TRICKY HOLDS A PRESS CONFERENCE 17
this
great republic. My own wife was once un
born. As you may recall, my children were both
unborn.
So when they say that Dixon has turned to the
issue of the unborn just for the sake of the votes ...
well, I ask only that you consider this list of the
previously unborn with whom I am associated in
both public and private life, and decide for yourself.
In fact, I think you are going to find, Mr. Shrewd,
with each passing day, people around this country
coming to realize that in this administration the
fetuses and embryos of America have at last found
their voice. Miss Charmin', I believe you had your
eyebrows raised. Miss C
HARMIN':
I was just going to
say, sir, that of course President Lyin' B. Johnson
was unborn, too, before he came to the White
Houseand he was a Democrat. Could you comment
on that?
TRICKY:
Miss Charmin', I would be the first to
applaud my predecessor in this high office for
having been unborn. I have no doubt that he was
an outstanding fetus down there in Texas before he
came into public life. I am not claiming that my
administration is the first in history to be cognizant
of the issue of fetal rights. I am saying that we
intend to do something about them, Mr. Practical.
MR. PRACTICAL:
Mr. President, I'd like to ask you
18 .
OUR GANG
to comment upon the scientific problems entailed
in bringing the vote to the unborn.
TRICKY:
Well, of
course, Mr. Practical, you have hit the nail right on
the head with the word "scientific." This is a
scientific problem of staggering proportions-let's
make no mistake about it. Moreover, I fully expect
there are those who ,are going to say in tomorrow's
papers that it is impossible, unfeasible, a utopian
dream, and so on. But as you remember, when
President Charisma came before the Congress in
1961, and announced that this country would put a
man on the moon before the end of the decade,
there were many who were ready to label him an
impossible dreamer, too. But we did it. With
American know-how and American teamwork, we
did it. And so too do I have every confidence that
our scientific and technological people are going to
dedicate themselves to bringing the vote to the
unborn-and not before the decade is out either, but
before November of 1972.
MR. PRACTICAL:
Can you give us some idea, sir,
how much a crash program like this will cost?
TRICKY:
Mr. Practical, I will be submitting a
proposed budget to the Congress within the next
ten days, but let me say this: you cannot achieve
greatness without sacrifice. The program of research
and development such as my scientific
advisers have outlined cannot - be bought "cheap."
After all, what we are talking about
TRICKY HOLDS A PRESS CONFERENCE 19
here is nothing less than the fundamental principle
of democracy: the vote. I cannot believe that the
members of the Congress of the United States are
going to play party politics when it comes to taking
a step like this, which will be an advance not only
for our nation, but for all mankind.
You just cannot imagine, for instance, the impact
that this is going to have on the people in the
underdeveloped countries. There are the Russians
and the Chinese, who don't even allow adults to
vote, and here we are in America, investing billions
and billions of the taxpayers' dollars in a scientific
project designed to extend the franchise to people
who cannot see or talk or hear or even think, in the
ordinary sense of the word. It would be a tragic
irony indeed, and as telling a sign as I can imagine
of national confusion and even hypocrisy, if we
were willing to send our boys to fight and die in
far-off lands so that defenseless peoples might have
the right to choose the kinds of government they
want in free elections, and then we were to turn
around here at home and continue to deny that
very same right to an entire segment of our population,
just because they happen to live on the
placenta or in the uterus, instead of New York City.
Mr. Catch-Me-in-a-Contradiction.
MR. CATCH-ME-IN-A-CONTRADICTION:
Mr. President,
what startles me is that up until today you have been
characterized, and not unwilling-
20 OUR GANG
ly, I think, as someone who, if he is not completely
out of touch with the styles and ideas of the young,
has certainly been skeptical of their wisdom.
Doesn't this constitute, if I may use the word, a
radical about-face; coming out now for the rights
of those who are not simply "young" but actually in
the gestation period?
TRICKY:
Well, I am glad you
raised that point, because I think it shows once and
for all just how flexible I am, and how I am always
willing to listen and respond to an appeal from any
minority group, no matter how powerless, just so
long as it is reasonable, and is not accompanied by
violence and foul language and throwing paint. If
ever there was proof that you don't have to camp