defense industries. In the postwar period 265 complete enterprises were built in China with technical assistance from the Soviet Union. Industrial enterprises accounted for 243 of them (91.6 percent). Of these only nine were left unfinished when Sino-Soviet cooperation ended.
51 According to the deputy chairman of China's State Planning Committee, Gong Zuoxin, Soviet assistance was involved in about half of all new plants put into operation by the end of 1957. 52
|
According to Russian figures, the Soviet Union assisted China in construction of enterprises for 9.4 billion rubles in export prices, with equipment deliveries amounting to 8.4 billion rubles and technical assistance to 1 billion rubles. 53 Thus expenditures on construction of industrial enterprises in China amounted to about 100 billion rubles in Soviet domestic budget terms. Taking into consideration that in 1959, the national income of the Soviet Union totaled approximately 1.3 trillion rubles, construction of enterprises in China accounted for approximately 7 percent of the Soviet annual national income. 54
|
It is possible to look at this figure from another angle. In 1960 Soviet authorities decided to begin construction of small apartments worth up to 35,000 rubles each. For the money invested in constructing industrial enterprises in China, the Soviets could have built about 2.6 million such apartments.
|
About half of all the equipment delivered from the Soviet Union to China was intended for military enterprises and plants. According to Soviet experts, at the end of the 1950s defense expenses amounted to more than one-quarter of the state budget of the People's Republic 7 billion yuan out of 26.9 billion yuan. 55 Defense was the largest area of expenditure in the PRC budget.
|
During the frosty Sino-Soviet relations in the 1960s and 70s, Soviet media claimed that the People's Republic would not have survived without Moscow's assistance. China, in turn, disparaged the importance of that aid. The existence of two antipolar views on this question hardly favored the improvement of relations between the countries. But it is telling that even during this period, authors in polemical articles published both in China and the Soviet Union evaded the question of past military cooperation. Now we know that this omission was not accidental the military cooperation was too important and too sensitive to figure in the polemics. For the Soviet Union, it was a huge gamble that ultimately failed. For China, it was heritage that proved politically embarrassing but militarily useful as the country took on the role of regional Great Power.
|
| 1. William W. Whitson, ed., Military and Political in Power in China in the 1970s (New York: Praeger, 1972), gives a good overview of early Western studies of the field. Western studies and estimates were, however, limited by a narrow database because of
|
|