Read Interzone 244 Jan - Feb 2013 Online
Authors: TTA Press
Tags: #short fiction, #fantasy, #short stories, #science fiction, #sf, #artwork, #reviews, #short fantasy, #interviews, #eric brown, #lavie tidhar, #new authors, #saladin ahmed, #movie reviews, #dvd reviews, #margaret atwood, #tony lee, #jim burns, #jim hawkins, #david langford, #nick lowe, #jim steel, #tracie welser, #ann vandermeer, #george zebrowski, #guy haley, #helen jackson, #karin tidbeck, #ramez naam
The Hobbit
was a strange book to
start with, and only got more so after Tolkien started fiddling
with it to force it into coherence with the larger story of
Sauron’s quest for the Ring. But the actual 1944 rewrite of
“Riddles in the Dark” (incorporated by a happy mixup into the 1951
and subsequent editions), and the subsequent well-documented
smaller changes to the text, are all but incidental to this story,
which centres instead on matters that never made it into the book
at all: above all, the retrospective expansion of the single
sentence explaining Gandalf’s detour to eject the Necromancer from
Dol Guldur (which Tolkien admitted in correspondence was merely an
ad hoc contrivance to take Gandalf out of the story for nine
chapters) into the climax of a 2000-year prequel to the War of the
Ring. The effect of this radical retroception was to turn
The
Hobbit
into a Rosencrantz & Guildenstern view of the real
story, which is the White Council’s assault on Dol Guldur and the
resultant flushing-out of Sauron from Mirkwood to Mordor. That
offscreen epic, which Tolkien himself never told circumstantially
in any form, makes the defeat of Smaug and the Battle of Five
Armies a footnote in a much vaster and more consequential saga,
which Peter Jackson and his partners in burglary are now trying
their sincerest to tell as it deserves. And while eyebrows may
levitate at the late decision to expand the two films shot into
three, Jackson has been here before; until Jackson blagged New Line
into bankrolling a trilogy, Miramax had been trying to shrink what
were then two films into one for $75m with half the hobbits killed
off. Indeed, three three-hour films is actually quite a modest
frame for this very large and ambitious expanded
Hobbit
,
especially if (as has been intimated) the third film will reach
past the end of the novel and deep into the untold hexecontaetia
beyond.
Unfortunately for Jackson, the film rights
to the
Hobbit
narrative are notoriously messy – far more so
than those for
LotR
, which is why Jackson had to abandon his
original 1995 plan to make
The Hobbit
first, why the 2010
MGM bankruptcy was so devastating to the production in its del Toro
two-film incarnation, and why almost everyone involved – Jackson,
New Line, Saul Zaentz, the Tolkien estate – has sued everyone else
along the way, before a dwarvish recognition of mutual benefit from
a shared quest imposed the present uneasy alliance and fellowship.
Tolkien’s colossal blunder in his 1969 contract with United Artists
sold away the film and merchandising rights in perpetuity, thus
effectively freezing his heirs out of any share in the profits.
This was then compounded by the estate’s own 1976 sale to Saul
Zaentz, who had bought the film rights from UA, of trademarks on
all the named characters, places, and objects in both works: a deal
as monumentally disadvantageous to the vendor as Fox’s surrender of
the
Star Wars
licensing rights to George Lucas the same
year. But Zaentz unaccountably failed to pick up the distribution
rights for
The Hobbit
from UA, whence they passed to MGM in
the 2004 merger; and even with a defibrillated MGM aboard as
co-producers, Jackson and New Line have access only to what was
sold by Tolkien in his lifetime. This includes the published
Hobbit
and the text and appendices of
LotR
– but not
the posthumously published material owned by Christopher Tolkien
from
The Silmarillion
onwards, including anything in the
12-volume
History of Middle-Earth
, or the unpublished
Hobbit
drafts, revisions, and plot notes subsequently
gathered in John Rateliff’s 2007 history of the text and its 2011
addenda. Thus, for example, the film Gandalf’s catalogue of the
Istari includes “the two blue wizards; I forget their names”
(audience: “Alatar and Pallando! Keep up, Ganders”), because the
names only appear in CJRT’s commentary in
Unfinished Tales
.
Crucially, the unowned material includes not just the abandoned
1960 rewrite, which set out to harmonise the tone with
LotR
until someone who may have been Naomi Mitchison torpedoed it after
two and a bit chapters, but the 1954 retelling “The Quest of
Erebor” – versions of which have been published by Tolkien
fils
in
Unfinished Tales
and in Douglas Anderson’s
annotated edition of
The Hobbit
, and which remains the only
version to attempt a causal explanation of the puzzlingly
synchronous relationship between Bilbo’s adventure and the White
Council’s campaign. Jackson may yet use this, if he can find a way
to reverse-engineer it from the surviving hints and fragments in
“Durin’s Folk” and the Tale of Years, or simply to appropriate it
without fear of a renewed legal tussle with the estate. Without it,
he has a significant problem.
An Unexpected Journey
is tentative in
its address to these issues, but is at least encouragingly aware of
the opportunities to resculpt the novel into something more closely
resembling JRRT’s own unrealised post-
Rings
conception of
its real story, no least by cashing in the new tolerance of both
audiences and studios for more expansive and generous multi-part
adaptations. Post-
Potter
audiences are perfectly used to
long films which give space to the scenes and characters they want
to see from the books, and which aren’t in a rush to condense and
abbreviate. And as the distended editions of the original trilogy
show off very well, Jackson is perfectly able to sustain a dense,
pacy narrative on a scale a third longer again than this, while his
familiar weaknesses as a filmmaker – slack plotting, tin-eared
dialogue, watery-eyed sentimentality, coarse melodramatisation,
lazy Hollywood-formula motivation, an abhorrence of understatement,
and jarringly crass injections of low-end kiwi humour – are if
anything better masked by the longer running times he’s continued
to explore in his post-
Rings
work. It’s admittedly a bold
choice to devote half the first act of a gigantic 3D IMAX HFR epic
to a single cramped scene of fifteen characters squeezed into a
hobbit-sized breakfast bar expounding their ample guts out; but the
leisurely dwarvish comedics play well to the younger audience who
need to be brought onside early if they’re to put up with much of
what’s coming, and those who grumble about the pacing must have
mercifully unremembered the interminable Cirith Ungol stretch of
Return
. Tiny throwaways inflate like airbags – the stone
giants are a single sentence in the book – and time has been found
not just for the pocket-handkerchief and the thrush but even for
the dwarves’ washing-up song and for Gollum’s subterranean doggerel
ditty.
If anything, Tolkien’s actual story has in
fact been fairly drastically condensed, pulling nine hundred years
of backstory into the timeframe of the film, and eliminating
Gandalf’s earlier expeditions to Dol Guldur and his discovery of
the Necromancer’s identity almost a century before the events of
The Hobbit
. How this squares with Gandalf’s acquisition of
the key to Erebor from Thráin is unclear, though it will be unlike
Jackson if he passes up the chance to exploit the Necromancer’s
involvement in the death of Thorin’s father – especially since, for
more Hollywood-compliant motivation, Azog the rather ropey digital
orc has here been allowed to survive his canonical slaying by Dáin
after offing Thorin’s granddad, and to assume the role taken in the
novel by his son Bolg so that Thorin can avenge two generations of
dads at once (result!). Hollywoodised in a different way is the
restructured motivation of the quest to “take back Erebor”, which
is here not about the treasure but the reestablishment of a
homeland for the diasporised Durinfolk in “the last dwarvish
kingdom in Middle-Earth” (erm, if you forget all about the Iron
Hills) – and an arc for Bilbo that modulates from midlife Call to
Adventure to homely hobbit’s sympathy for the unhomed. (Needless to
say, this being Jackson/Walsh/Boyens, Bilbo doesn’t trust to
show-don’t-tell but spells it out for them on the big dwarvish
nose.) Dol Guldur is brought into the foreground storyline by
introducing an orcish pursuit by Azog on the Necromancer’s
business, even though this makes for a curious slippage between the
scary orcs above ground and the comically inept goblins below. The
White Council meet conveniently at Rivendell during Bilbo’s
stopover to debate northern strategy, while big backstory inserts
make screentime for the arrival of Smaug, the battle of Moria, and
similar nods to Tolkien’s own unembarrassed fondness for analeptic
flourishes. Yet mostly it’s still the
Hobbit
we know with
bits of the untold tipped in, and some earnest if clumsy engagement
with the questions Tolkien continued to wrestle with for decades:
why a hobbit? Why Bilbo? What in the name of Manwë was Gandalf
thinking?
As the technical landmark it seeks to be,
the film is a fascinatingly mixed-success adventure. It’s thrilling
to see Jackson finally let into the 3D party, with swooping tours
of Erebor in its prime and the subterranean orcopolis delivering
what the famous shots of the pits of Orthanc could only foreshadow.
All the same, at my screening the left visual channel dropped
temporarily out when we hit Rivendell, and the audience removed
their glasses to wipe lenses in bemusement, only to find themselves
awakened blinking into a glowing 2D world of brilliant light and
colour in which many would have been quite happy to spend the rest
of the film. And while the 3D is undeniably smoother in 48fps, the
unexpected cultural problem with the crispness and clarity of HFR
is that it looks to most eyes like television, an impression hardly
helped by the engagement of so many small-screen faces. The dwarves
do what they can, the broader performances nicely darkened by
knowledge of Thorin’s arc, the fates of his nephews, and what will
happen to the amiable Balin when he tries to replicate the Erebor
triumph in Moria. But the cut from Ian Holm to Martin Freeman in
the role of Bilbo only underlines the difference in register from
the earlier trilogy, as a comic actor of great deftness and timing
but more limited dramatic range takes over, still in his Arthur
Dent dressing gown, from a stunning classical master of sixpence
tonal turns. Freeman is good at pity staying his hand, but you
still can’t quite imagine him doing Bilbo’s scene with the Ring in
Rivendell in
Fellowship
.
While the action sequences and the
landscapes all look lovely, the art of makeup has yet to catch up
with the more ruthless scrutiny afforded. If you were going to
choose a film to showcase the attractions of 48fps IMAX, you
probably wouldn’t opt for one in which thirteen of your most
closeupped characters perform in fake foreheads and latex honkers,
and your returning stars are ten-years-older actors attempting to
play versions of their characters sixty years younger. Gandalf is
disconcertingly ravaged; you can see every one of Galadriel’s new
elven wrinkles; and a painfully frail Saruman has had his sit-down
role pasted digitally in from Pinewood and then telepathically
talked over anyway (probably a mercy, as the audible part of his
speech is frankly beneath his dignity, with some quite dreadful
stuff about Radagast’s excessive consumption of mushrooms and a
nonsense line about “calling himself the Necromancer” when they’ve
just made that title up themselves). The overwhelming effect is to
make the insanely expensive look cheap, and while one does attune
to the look, it’s not in the immersive way its makers hope but
rather in a heightened tolerance of artificiality and semiosis,
with the long, actorly dialogue scenes and sub-illusory makeup
repeatedly invoking the feel not of film but of theatre, quite
often to the film’s advantage. The riddles in the dark, in
particular, play beautifully as a nine-minute two-hander (only one
pair of riddles is cut) between two scenery-eating performers at
the very top of their game, and it seems almost incidental that one
of them happens to be mocapped. Perhaps this is indeed the next
revolution in cinema, but you can bet Jim Cameron is nervous.
From time to time in the writing of both
Hobbit
and
LotR
Tolkien would stop in his tracks and
review the road ahead, and his
Hobbit
notes especially show
the story being improvised as it went – which is why Thorin’s arc
in the book takes such an unanticipated turn, and Bard is so
belatedly promoted and named as a pivotal figure.
Journey
’s
horripilant climactic shot of Erebor seen from the Eyrie invites a
similar mapping of the way that will lie before them when Bilbo
awakes in
The
Desolation of Smaug
with the early sun
in his eyes. That Jackson is playing a thoughtful long game is
suggested by the almost impossibly dense allusions to
Fellowship
in particular, from the initial undeleted scenes
from the day of Bilbo’s eleventy-first, via the myriad Bag End
details reactivated for new meaning and resonance, to the visual
quotation of Frodo’s moment in the Prancing Pony when the ring
first falls on to Bilbo’s finger. Thranduil pops his head around
the door as a teaser for his role in film 2, but nothing is yet
seen of his famous son – nor of Glóin’s, at this time a youngster
of 62, nor of any ten-year-old human ward wandering round Rivendell
in the background, though it seems inconceivable that something
will not occur on the back-again; and while it would be pleasant
not to see any more of Liv Tyler, the smart money must be on some
involvement of Lorien in the Dol Guldur campaign which would open a
window of opportunism that Jackson might find hard to resist. Given
that we open on an owl eye and end on Smaug’s, it’s a safe bet what
the final shot of
There and Back Again
will be. Of course we
can safely expect disappointments, even desolation – but perhaps at
least a fourteenth share of gold.