Authors: Rodney Stark,David Drummond
MUSLIM MEMORIES
Karen Armstrong is one of the many who would have us believe that the Crusades are “one of the direct causes of the conflict in the Middle East today.”
18
That may be so, but not because the Muslim world has been harboring bitterness over the Crusades for the past many centuries. As Jonathan Riley-Smith explained: “One often reads that Muslims have inherited from their medieval ancestors bitter memories of the violence of the crusaders. Nothing could be further from the truth. Before the end of the nineteenth century Muslims had not shown much interest in the crusades…[looking] back on [them] with indifference and complacency.”
19
Even at the time they took place, Muslim chroniclers paid very little attention to the Crusades, regarding them as invasions by “a primitive, unlearned, impoverished, and un-Muslim people, about whom Muslim rulers and scholars knew and cared little.”
20
Moreover, most Arabs dismissed the Crusades as having been attacks upon the hated Turks, and therefore of little interest.
21
Indeed, in the account written by Ibn Zafir at the end of the twelfth century, it was said that it was better that the Franks occupied the kingdom of Jerusalem as this prevented “the spread of the influence of the Turks to the lands of Egypt.”
22
Muslim interest in the Crusades seems to have begun in the nineteenth century, when the term itself
23
was introduced by Christian Arabs who translated French histories into Arabic—for it was in the West that the Crusades first came back into vogue during the nineteenth century. In Europe and the United States “the romance of the crusades and crusading” became a very popular literary theme, as in the many popular novels of Sir Walter Scott.
24
Not surprisingly, this development required that, at least in Britain and America, the Crusades be “de-Catholicized.”
25
In part this was done by emphasizing the conflict between the Knights Templars and the pope, transforming the former into an order of valiant anti-Catholic heroes. In addition, there developed a strong linkage between the European imperial impulse and the romantic imagery of the Crusades “to such an extent that, by World War One, war campaigns and war heroes were regularly lauded as crusaders in the popular press, from the pulpit, and in the official propaganda of the British war machine.”
26
Meanwhile in the East, the Ottoman Empire was fully revealed as “the sick man of Europe,” a decrepit relic unable to produce any of the arms needed for its defense, which highlighted the general backwardness of Islamic culture and prompted “seething anger”
27
against the West among Muslim intellectuals, eventually leading them to focus on the Crusades.
Thus, current Muslim memories and anger about the Crusades are a twentieth-century creation,
28
prompted in part by “post-World War I British and French imperialism and the post-World War II creation of the state of Israel.”
29
It was the last sultan of the Ottoman Empire to rule with absolute authority, Abdülham
d II (r. 1876–1909), who began to refer to European Crusades. This prompted the first Muslim history of the Crusades, published in 1899. In the introduction, its author, Sayyid Ali al-Hariri, noted: “The sovereigns of Europe nowadays attack our Sublime Empire in a manner bearing great resemblance to the deeds of those people in bygone times [the crusaders]. Our most glorious sultan, Abdulhamid II, has rightly remarked that Europe is now carrying out a Crusade against us.”
30
This theme was eagerly picked up by Muslim nationalists. “Only Muslim unity could oppose these new crusades, some argued, and the crusading threat became an important theme in the writings of the pan-Islamic movement”
31
Even within the context of Muslim weakness in the face the modern West, Islamic triumphalism flourished; many proposed that through the Crusades the “savage West…benefited by absorbing [Islam’s] civilized values.” As for crusader effects on Islam, “how could Islam benefit from contacts established with an inferior, backward civilization?”
32
Eventually, the image of the brutal, colonizing crusader proved to have such polemical power that it drowned out nearly everything else in the ideological lexicon of Muslim antagonism toward the West—except, of course, for Israel and paranoid tales about the worldwide Jewish conspiracy.
CONCLUSION
The thrust of the preceding chapters can be summarized very briefly. The Crusades were not unprovoked. They were not the first round of European colonialism. They were not conducted for land, loot, or converts. The crusaders were not barbarians who victimized the cultivated Muslims. They sincerely believed that they served in God’s battalions.
Abulafia, Anna Sapir. 1985. “Invectives Against Christianity in the Hebrew Chronicles of the First Crusade.” In Edbury 1985, 66–72.
Abun-Nasr, Jamil. 1971.
A History of the Maghrib.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Afsaruddin, Asma. 1990. “The Great Library at
Alexandria.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology
49:291–92.
Ahmad, Aziz. 1975.
A History of Islamic Sicily.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Ajram, Dr. K. 1992.
The Miracle of Islamic Science.
Cedar Rapids, IA: Knowledge House.
Alroy, Gil Carl. 1975.
Behind the Middle East Conflict: The Real Impasse Between Arabs and Jews.
New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Andrea, A. J. 2003. “The Crusades in Perspective: The Crusades in Modern Islamic Perspective.”
History Compass
1:1–4.
Anonymous. [c. 1102] 1962.
Gesta Francorum: The Deeds of the Franks and Other Pilgrims to Jerusalem.
Translated by Rosalind Hill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Armstrong, Karen. [1991] 2001.
Holy War: The Crusades and Their Impact on Today’s World.
2nd ed. New York: Random House.
Asbridge, Thomas. 2004.
The First Crusade: A New History.
Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Atiya, Aziz S. 1968.
History of Eastern Christianity.
Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
—————. 1966.
Crusade, Commerce and Culture.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bachrach, Bernard S. 1985. “On the Origins of William the Conqueror’s Horse Transports.”
Technology and Culture
26:505–31.
Bairoch, Paul. 1988.
Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present.
Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Baldwin, Marshall W., ed. 1969.
A History of the Crusades.
Vol. 1,
The First Hundred Years.
Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
Baldwin, Summerfield. 1937.
Business in the Middle Ages.
New York: Henry Holt.
Barber, Malcolm. 1994.
The New Knighthood: A History of the Order of the Temple.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Baron, Salo Wittmayer. 1957.
A Social and Religious History of the Jews.
Vols. 3, 4, and 5. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Becker, Carl Heinrich. [1909] 2006.
Christianity and Islam.
Boston: IndyPublish.
—————. 1926a. “The Expansion of the Saracens—the East.” In
The Cambridge Medieval History,
ed. J. B. Bury, H. M. Gwatkin, and J. P. Whitney, 2:329–65. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
—————. 1926b. “The Expansion of the Saracens—Africa and Europe.” In
The Cambridge Medieval History,
ed. J. B. Bury, H. M. Gwatkin, and J. P. Whitney, 2:366–90. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Bédier, Joseph, and Pierre Aubry. 1909.
Chansons de Croisade.
Honoré Champion: Paris.
Beeching, Jack. 1982.
The Galleys at Lepanto.
New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Berry, Virginia G. 1969. “The Second Crusade.” In Baldwin 1969, 463–512.
Biddle, Martin. 1999.
The Tomb of Christ.
Thrupp, UK: Sutton Publishing.
Bloom, Jonathan. 2007. “Islam on the Temple.”
Times Literary Supplement,
December 7, 7–8.
Boas, Adrian J. 1998. “The Frankish Period: A Unique Medieval Society Emerges.”
Near Eastern Archaeology
61:138–73.
Boorstin, Daniel J. 1983.
The Discoverers.
New York: Random House.
Bramhall, Edith Clementine. 1901. “The Origin of the Temporal Privileges of Crusaders.”
American Journal Of Theology
5:279–92.
Brand, Charles M. 1962. “The Byzantines and Saladin, 1185–1192: Opponents of the Third Crusade.”
Speculum
37:167–81.
Brent, Michael, and Elizabeth Fentress. 1996.
The Berbers.
Oxford: Blackwells.
Brickman, William W. 1961. “The Meeting of East and West in Educational History.”
Comparative Education Review
5:82–98.
Brown, Gordon S. 2003.
The Norman Conquest of Southern Italy and Sicily.
Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Brundage, James A. 1985. “Prostitution, Miscegenation and Sexual Purity in the First Crusade.” In Edbury 1985, 57–65.
Bull, Marcus. 1993.
Knightly Piety and the Lay Response to the First Crusade: The Limousin and Gascony, c. 970-c. 1130.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bulliet, Richard W. [1975] 1990.
The Camel and the Wheel.
New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
—————. 1979a.
Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period: An Essay in Quantitative History.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
—————. 1979b. “Conversion to Islam and the Emergence of Muslim Society in Iran.”
In
Conversion to Islam,
ed. Nehemia Levtzion, 30–51. New York: Holmes & Meier. Burman, Edward. 1986.
The Templars: Knights of God.
Rochester, VT: Destiny Books. Butler, Alfred. [1902] 1992.
The Arab Conquest of Egypt.
Brooklyn: A&B Publishers Group.
—————. 1884.
Ancient Coptic Churches in Egypt.
Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Cahen, Claude. 1969. “The Turkish Invasion: The Selchükids.” In Baldwin 1969, 135–76.
Cardini, Franco. 2001.
Europe and Islam.
Oxford: Blackwell.
Carroll, James. 2004.
Crusade: Chronicles of an Unjust War.
New York: Metropolitan Books.
Cate, James Lea. 1969. “The Crusade of 1101.” In Baldwin 1969, 343–69.
Cazel, Fred A. 1955. “The Tax of 1185 in Aid of the Holy Land.”
Speculum
30: 385–92.
Chandler, Tertius. 1987.
Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth: An Historical Census.
2nd ed. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Charanis, Peter. 1969. “The Byzantine Empire in the Eleventh Century.” In Baldwin 1969, 177–219.
Chazan, Robert. 2006.
The Jews of Medieval Western Christendom, 1000–1500.
Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
—————. 1996.
In the Year 1096: The First Crusade and the Jews.
Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.
—————. 1986.
European Jewry and the First Crusade.
Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
—————, ed. 1980.
Church, State, and Jew in the Middle Ages
(a collection of original sources). West Orange, NJ: Behrman House.
Cheetham, Nicolas. 1983.
Keepers of the Keys: The History of the Popes from St. Peter to John Paul II.
New York: Scribner’s.
Cohen, Raymond. 2008.
Saving the Holy Sepulchre.
New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Cole, Penny J. 1991.
The Preaching of the Crusades to the Holy Land, 1095–1270.
Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America.
Colish, Marcia L. 1997.
Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition: 400-1400.
New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
Collins, Roger. 1998.
Charlemagne.
Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
Comnena, Anna. [c. 1148] 1969.
The Alexiad.
London: Penguin Classics.
Constable, Giles. 1953. “The Second Crusade as Seen by Contemporaries.”
Traditio
9:213–79.
Curry, Andrew. 2002. “The Crusades, the First Holy War.”
U.S. News & World Report,
April 8, 36.
Daniel-Rops, Henri. 1957.
Cathedral and Crusade: Studies of the Medieval Church, 1050–1350.
London: Dent.
Davidson, H. R. Ellis. 1976.
The Viking Road to Byzantium.
London: George Allen & Unwin.
Davis, Paul K. 2001.
100 Decisive Battles from Ancient Times to the Present.
Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Davis, William Stearns, ed. 1913.
Readings in Ancient History: Illustrative Extracts from the Sources.
Vol. 2,
Rome and the West.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Delbrück, Hans. [1920] 1990.
The Barbarian Invasions: History of the Art of War.
Vol. 2. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
Dennet, Daniel C., Jr. 1948. “Pirenne and Muhammad.”
Speculum
23:165–90.
d’Eszlary, Charles. 1958. “Magna Carta and the Assises of Jerusalem.”
American Journal of Legal History
2:189–214.
Dickens, Mark. 1999. “The Church of the East.” www.oxuscom.com/ch-of-east.htm.
Donner, Fred McGraw. 1981.
The Early Islamic Conquests.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Duby, Georges. 1994.
The Knight, the Lady, and the Priest.
Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
—————. 1977.
The Chivalrous Society.
Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Duffy, Eamon. 1997.
Saints and Sinners: A History of the Popes.
New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
Duncalf, Frederic. 1969a. “The Councils of Piacenza and Clermont.” In Baldwin 1969, 220–52.
—————. 1969b. “The First Crusade: Clermont to Constantinople.” In Baldwin 1969, 253–79.
—————. 1921. “The Peasants’ Crusade.”
American Historical Review
26:440–53.
Durant, Will. 1950.
The Age of Faith.
New York: Simon and Schuster.
Edbury, Peter. 1999. “Warfare in the Latin East.” In
Medieval Warfare: A History,
ed. Maurice Keen, 89–112. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
—————, ed. 1985.
Crusade and Settlement
(papers in honor of R. C. Smail.). Cardiff, UK: Univ. College Cardiff Press.
Ehrenkreutz, A. S. 1955. “The Place of Saladin in the Naval History of the Mediterranean Sea in the Middle Ages.”
Journal of the American Oriental Society
75:100–116.
Ekelund, Robert B., Robert F. Hébert, Robert D. Tollison, Gary M. Anderson, and Audrey B. Davidson. 1999.
Sacred Trust: The Medieval Church as an Economic Firm.
New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Erdmann, Carl. [1935] 1977.
The Origin of the Idea of Crusade.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Erdoes, Richard. 1988.
A.D. 1000: Living on the Brink of the Apocalypse.
New York: Harper and Row.
Fahmy, Aly Mohamed. 1966.
Muslim Sea-Power in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Cairo: National Publication.
Farah, Caesar E. 1994.
Islam: Beliefs and Observations.
5th ed. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s.
Ferris, Eleanor. 1902. “The Financial Relations of the Knights Templars to the English Crown.”
American Historical Review
8:1–17.
Fink, Harold S. 1969. “The Foundation of the Latin States, 1099–1118.” In Baldwin 1969, 368–409.
Fletcher, Richard. 1997.
The Barbarian Conversion: From Paganism to Christianity.
New York: Henry Holt and Company.
—————. 1992.
Moorish Spain.
Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.