Read Cooking for Geeks: Real Science, Great Hacks, and Good Food Online
Authors: Jeff Potter
Tags: #COOKING / Methods / General
Most dishes involve a combination of ingredients that contain at least two different primary tastes, because the combination brings balance and adds depth and complexity. Whether the dish is a French classic or a simple item of produce, the taste will be simple (“one note”) unless it’s paired with at least one other.
To alter the flavor of fresh fruit, you can sprinkle it with sugar (try this on strawberries) or salt (on grapefruit), wet it with lime juice (papaya, watermelon, peaches with honey), or combine it with an ingredient from another taste family (sweet watermelon and salty feta cheese). If you can find fresh papaya, try slicing it and sprinkling a bit of cayenne pepper and salt on top of the pieces for a salty/sweet/hot combination. Try replacing the papaya with other tropical fruits and the cayenne pepper with other hot items. Guava and chili pepper? Mango salad with jalapeños and cilantro? Strawberries and black pepper?
Black pepper has no capsaicin (the chemical that gives cayenne pepper and jalapeños their heat) but is still pungent due to another chemical, piperine.
For another twist, try mixing foods high in fats with hot ingredients. They should pair well with ingredients that contain capsaicin, because capsaicin is fat soluble. Experiment with avocado and sriracha sauce, commonly known as
rooster sauce
for the drawing on the bottle of one popular brand.
Rooster sauce (sriracha sauce — Thai hot sauce), it has been said, can improve the taste of
any
dorm food, but beware, it’s spicy. As one friend quipped to me, it’ll hit you like a freight train and then leave like a freight train.
For you visual thinkers, here’s a diagram of the combinations of the four basic flavors, with a few foods labeled for each combination. Ask yourself: what other foods have these combinations? When cooking, think about which tastes your dish emphasizes and in which direction you want it to go.
Many foods are combinations of three or more primary tastes. Ketchup, for example, is surprisingly complex, with tastes of umami (tomatoes), sourness (vinegar), sweetness (sugar), and saltiness (salt).
Taste combinations are equally important in drinks. The hallmark of a well-mixed cocktail is the balance between bitter (bitters) and sweet (sugar). Likewise, unless you’ve learned to enjoy bitterness, coffee and tea (slightly bitter) are commonly combined with sweeteners (milk, sugar, honey) or acidifiers (lemon juice, orange juice) to balance out the tastes.
In some cases, the combination of different primary tastes is achieved by serving two separate components together, pairing one dish with a second on the basis that the two will complement each other. In Indian food, for example, the salty sweetness of a yogurt lassi balances out the spicy hotness of curries. Consider the following combinations of primary flavors. With the exception of bitter/salty, every pair of primary tastes is a common combination.
Combination | Single-ingredient example | Combination example |
---|---|---|
Salty + sour | Pickles Preserved lemon peel | Salad dressings |
Salty + sweet | Seaweed (slightly sweet via mannitol) | Watermelon and feta cheese Banana with sharp cheddar cheese Cantaloupe and prosciutto Chocolate-covered pretzels |
Sour + sweet | Oranges | Lemon juice and sugar (e.g., lemonade) Grilled corn with lime juice |
Bitter + sour | Cranberries Grapefruit (sour via citric acid; bitter via naringin) | Negroni (cocktail with gin, vermouth, Campari) |
Bitter + sweet | Bitter parsley Granny Smith apples | Bittersweet chocolate Coffee/tea with sugar/honey |
Bitter + salty | (N/A) | Sautéed kale with salt Mustard greens with bacon |
If it’s summertime and you’re able to get good watermelon, try this simple salad to experience the contrast in flavors between the salt in feta cheese and the sweetness of watermelon.
In a bowl, toss to coat:
Notes
There is some evidence that suggests our taste receptors can interact with the capsaicin in hot peppers (for you bio geeks, via TRPM1) and possibly menthol in mint (via TRPM8), but these interactions are not yet well understood in the science domain, let alone the culinary world.
Dicing a watermelon is easier and faster than using a melon baller. Using a knife, make a series of parallel slices in one direction, and then repeat for the other two axes.
Virginia Utermohlen is an associate professor of nutritional sciences at Cornell University, where she studies individual differences in taste and smell sensitivity and how those differences relate to our personality and ability to perform.
Do different people taste things differently?
Yes, there are genetic variations all over the place. We have differences in the taste buds and the trigeminal nerve, plus people differ in their saliva, which influences taste. What I taste and what you taste in the same food is going to be different.
One difference is sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). People are genetically capable or incapable of tasting it. Certain populations such as the Sub-Saharan Africans tend to be very sensitive to it, and then there are populations in Europe where insensitivity is very common. The British are famous for simple flavor systems and they tend to be fairly insensitive tasters, whereas if you look at the flavors in Asian, Sub-Saharan African, and indigenous American cuisines, those people are highly sensitive tasters and their foods have complex flavor profiles.
The trigeminal nerve senses hot and cold, pain, texture, and to some extent sweet, independently of the taste bud cells. Compounds like menthol bind to the same receptor that changes shape in response to cold temperatures, so the brain interprets what menthol is doing as cooling, even though it’s not colder than anything else around. Similarly with capsaicin: it binds with the receptor that changes confirmation with warm or hot temperatures so the brain says, “This is hot!” It really isn’t hot, but the brain interprets it as that. There are differences [in trigeminal sensitivity] from one individual to the next. Some people will put an Altoid on their tongue for the first time and think, “This isn’t bad!” Another person puts one on their tongue and thinks it’s got to get out of there as soon as it can. Once those trigeminal nerves get overactivated, it’s painful. Another thing that the trigeminal nerve senses is pungency. French cheeses are very pungent.
Is there something about the French that causes them to like pungency in cheese?
In my rather small sample, the people of French descent tend to be more sensitive to the cooling sensation from mint. So on the average my guess is that they would be more trigeminally sensitive.
If the French tend to be more trigeminally sensitive, it seems like they would be more sensitive to the pungency in cheeses and thus not like them very much.
This is something important and interesting: if you are sensitive to something, it can be either adverse or pleasant. Now pungency, in my opinion, is not aversive. Some people think it is. I personally like chocolate that’s quite bitter. Just because something has a quality doesn’t mean it’s aversive or pleasant. That varies from person to person.
Something you said makes me wonder about beer and wine, and low trigeminal sensitivity versus high trigeminal sensitivity.
The carbonation and pungency of beer give it a trigeminal kick. If you are sensitive to the pungent, the trigeminal side of things, but not sensitive to the bitterness of beer, you’re going to like beer a lot better than I do. I can’t stand it!
So could one take a PROP test strip and a menthol candy and between those two things figure out which a person likes more, beer or wine?
That’s possible. I’ve never done that experiment before.
Dr. Utermohlen had previously explained to me that individuals who define “reasonable” as “logical” are generally less trigeminally sensitive and those who define it as “justifiable, fair” tend to be more trigeminally sensitive. Note that trigeminal sensitivity is a separate phenomenon from PROP sensitivity.
We talked about how people define the word “reasonable” in a previous conversation. Why would somebody who is more trigeminally sensitive define reasonable as fair?
Well, here is my hypothesis — not that I necessarily have any proof of this — but taste and smell go to the orbitofrontal cortex, which is the part of the brain that is critical in evaluating whatever you experience. That’s its job: to
evaluate
whether something is good or not.
When you
reason
something through, it’s another way of getting at whether something is good or not. Logical reasoning makes use primarily of another part of the brain called the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex. That part of the brain gets no input whatsoever from taste and smell.
Which way you decide to think something through will depend on which way you decide how something has value. It depends on whether you go to the that-smells-fishy-to-me sort of evaluation versus a logical evaluation.
Does this mean that when people talk about making decisions from their gut versus logical decisions, they’re making decisions with their orbito-frontal cortex versus their dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex?
Yeah. I think so. I really do.
What about geeks?
In my experience, geeks are very mixed in their sensitivities. In our data, the more mathematically oriented computer scientists tend to be on average nontasters. The computer scientists who are more interested in the purpose of a program tend to be more sensitive tasters. One group of geeks will be creative in ways that are highly logical and scientific. That other crowd, however, will be interested in emotion and expression and look at programming in a holistic way. That crowd will “get it” when you ask them if sunsets or the crackle and flame of a wood fire spark their imagination.
Wait, what’s this?
Some of the questions that we ask have to do with a phenomenon called
absorption
, the capacity to become completely immersed in a sensory experience. On the average, from the data we have, people who are moved by a sunset, or for whom the crackle and flames of a wood fire spark the imagination or may produce visual images are highly trigeminally sensitive.
I believe that people who have a high capacity for absorption should imagine what a dish would be like, and then work toward it by maybe adding a pinch of this or that, tasting as they go. They should really spend time experimenting at what the differences in tastes are like, and not be religiously bound to a recipe.
And the other type?
The other type might stick to a recipe, because they are probably going to have better success if they follow A, follow B, follow C, follow D, and the thing will come out. It requires less guesswork, and so is less dependent on a person’s sensitivity.