UFOs in Reality (27 page)

Next morning was again a bright and sunny one, promising another hot day to follow. I met with Mr. Bull and, with the farmer standing on the area of the stubble field once occupied by the airborne stalks, I took photographs towards the farmhouse to show how close the event had been to the house. As we came together again after this, Mr. Bull very generously offered to take me to the other site, some distance along a cart track, in his pick-up truck. After we had arrived at the edge of a large field, I was guided to the approximate spot where the ‘tubes’ event had taken place. This was located close to the far side of the field, which was bounded on that edge by the Wansdyke Path, with an ancient burial mound just beyond it in the wood. Mr. Bull then gave me a graphic description of the phenomenon. It had occurred late afternoon on a fine, overcast and humid day in August. The ‘tube’ had suddenly appeared close by without any commotion being caused. It had an estimated diameter of about 4 feet (1.2 metres) on the ground and had seemed to have the same diameter, diminished by perspective, all the way up into the sky haze. It was definitely not any kind of tornado. (He had witnessed one of those in the past.) When it had first appeared he had been some 20 yards (metres) away from it. He had become intrigued by the strange rattling noises coming from its base and had then walked to within 10 feet (3 metres) of it. There, he had been amazed to find bits of straw and dust being swirled round at high speed, within the confines of the ‘tube’, even though he could not see through the blackness of the tube at eye-level. As Mr. Bull stood with me reliving the event, it suddenly occurred to him that the black dust could not have accounted for the blackness of the tube, because the dust and straw hadn’t seemed to be lifted from the ground. In any case the base of the tube had only moved about 2 feet (say 0.5 metre) during its lifetime of about 5 minutes, after which it had simply vanished into thin air. Within a minute or so of its disappearance, a similar one had established itself closer to the corner of the same field and had persisted for a shorter period of time. That one had disappeared leaving a thin wisp of condensation. An entry in his farm diary for August 24th, 1990, confirmed all that Mr. Bull had told to me about the time of the events and the prevailing conditions.

As these events had occurred close to an ancient trackway and site, I was keen to know more about the area. Flint and stone implements had been regularly unearthed in that field, demonstrating that a prehistoric settlement had once been established there. So, here again was another link being created in my mind between what one could correctly assume to have been
a demonstration of advanced technology, not of this world, at an ancient site
.
As for the technology being demonstrated, it seemed to me that Mr. Bull had probably witnessed the means by which crop circles were being formed, when the same equipment was used in a different mode.

On returning home to Cheshire, I began pondering how the projected beam witnessed by Mr. Bull (for I was sure that that had been the nature of the phenomenon) might be manipulated to carry out different tasks. Considering my guess, expressed in Phase 3, that a form of very high frequency gravitational radiation might be being employed for the crop circles task, how could that same beam technology be used to just swirl loose material objects on the ground, to push crops to the ground and, possibly, to uplift objects, animals and humans. The answer seemed to lie in the degree of focusing of the beam. The Bull phenomenon had been produced by a cylindrical beam; that is, it had not displayed signs of focusing. The rotating electro-mechanical energy within it seemed only to have been scanning the ground.

If, however, such a beam were to be focused in a convergent manner onto the ground, the gravitational energy within it would, conceivably, produce a gravitational force field, which might accelerate objects with mass towards the ground in an artificial way. This might account for the overpressure experienced by the crop stems. On the other hand, if the beam diverged between projector and the ground, a negative (upwards) gravity force might be experienced by material objects on the ground below. So, by using one type of projection system, it would be possible to use it to scan, to press down and to uplift whatever was on the ground immediately below the field-generating aerial craft. All this is shown diagrammatically by Fig. 47.

Fig. 47

Jennifer Jarvis

When we were once again in Wiltshire during the summer of 1995, we booked in with the Bulls for B&B for a few nights. On arriving downstairs for breakfast the following morning, we were pleased to find we were in the company of a young, good-looking, woman. After introductions all round, it seemed that we were all on crop-circle missions. We discovered that our new contact was Jennifer Jarvis, who was taking time off from family duties in Canada to become acquainted with the strange phenomena being reported from Southern England. Having been reared in England and having parents and a brother still living in the South, she was not on altogether unfamiliar territory, even though she had been settled in Canada for quite a long time. As we were to discover, our new companion was a bundle of energy and was always ready to follow a new lead with great enthusiasm. The news about those ‘tubes’ witnessed by Mr. Bull in fields close to the farm a few years before was more than she could bear. She wanted to see things like that for herself and, indeed, she had already become acquainted with the then current crop-circles ‘scene’ by travelling round the sites. When we left and went our different ways for that day, Marion and I had three special missions in hand. We had arranged to meet up with Roy Rowlands to video the ‘scene’ for our forthcoming Part 2 video recording, to meet with an American tour group we had met and assisted on previous occasions and to contact the CSETI group to arrange a video interview with
Dr. Steven Greer
. By the end of that day, all that had been accomplished. The next day was devoted to the videoing task with Roy Rowlands. That was to be our last night at the farm before travelling back to Torquay, Devon, our new (retirement) home base. Next morning, Jennifer and I spent a considerable time at breakfast, comparing notes and promising to keep in touch after we had all returned home.

My lasting liaison with Jennifer Jarvis began three days after we had arrived home, with a telephone call from Jennifer in Canada. Following onto this, I supplied Jennifer with a timings graph centred on her location to the west of Toronto. As I was not available via e-mail, all correspondence between us at that time had to be mainly by Air Mail, with the inevitable lag of 5 to 7 days between postings and receipts. A card posted by Jennifer on August 18th informed me that she had decided to apply for CSETI training. There was also a request for an Alton Barnes, Wiltshire, graph, to include the Avebury
area, in preparation for her next visit. Then began a stream of letters over the following few months. At first, they informed me of UFO events reported to her by Canadian associates which, invariably, had been found to lie on the lines of the graph for her Canadian location. Gradually the area of application expanded with reports from other places some appreciable distance removed from Jennifer’s home area. Further graphs were produced for those areas. And there was one other graph requested for Moffat/Crestone, Colorado, USA, where Jennifer was hoping to be located during her first CSETI training course. All this within a month of our first meeting at the farm in Wiltshire. I was only too pleased to co-operate! Here, at last was someone who really wanted to test the AT in different places and in different ways. In return and to help me locate places mentioned in her reports, Jennifer supplied me with two detailed maps of South Ontario and up-state New York. The CSETI training course in Crestone
took place in the summer of 1996 and Jennifer returned from it fully revitalised and wanting to get started locally. She drew together a small team of friends and associates and they began going out to selected sites for skywatches.

During the Spring of 1997, Jennifer and her small team of associates had begun to occupy, quite regularly, a site on the shore at the north-west end of Lake Ontario, which had been found to provide much aerial excitement. This location, near Oakville, looks south over the lake towards Hamilton and Stoney Creek. The famous Niagara is over there to the east-south-east. Quite frequently the group had begun to observe strange light phenomena out over the water, looking towards the south-east of their location. Jennifer brought her zoom-lens equipped camcorder to bear on these anomalous lights and began creating a video recording of them. The most outstanding and puzzling feature seemed to be a pillar of light or ‘light pillar’ which seemed to precede the ‘light-ball’ aerial activity. These light balls seemed to appear from different directions to converge over the light pillar and then to merge with it, as if diving into the lake. When Jennifer first told me of these events, I had studied the maps she had provided. The far shore looking south-east was measured to be about 24 miles away, and my first thought had been that the group may have been viewing the lights of aircraft landing at St. Catharines Airport, near Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario. St.Catharines was perfectly in line with the bearing I had been given for the lights. Given certain atmospheric conditions, distorted ‘mirage’ images of aircraft landing lights and even airport ground lighting might be produced. I suggested trying to view the same phenomena from somewhere along the lake shore to the south and west of the group’s usual position. Jennifer at first rejected the idea she was spending precious time recording mirages, but she would view the scene from a different position, if only to remove that possibility from my mind. The outcome was that the lights were still seen to be over the lake from a position nearer Hamilton. From the bearing Jennifer supplied, the lights then seemed to be located midway between Oakville and St. Catharines. My next suggestion was that the group should hire a boat to explore that area of the lake and, perhaps, to view the phenomena at closer quarters; however, Jennifer was not prepared to be that brave. No way could she be persuaded to get onto that water, especially at night!

So, the saga continues. Jennifer has now amassed much video footage of those anomalous lights, which she makes available to be analysed by experts. She has also produced a web site called ‘ORBWATCH’ and some of her footage and stills are displayed on this. I have produced a timings graph for the area and it seems the ‘boys’ (as Jennifer calls them) are following the global UFO timings rules as given by the AT. All the evidence seems to imply that there is some sort of ET base under Lake Ontario, to which ET exploration craft return between missions and before being retrieved. It would be nice to think so!

The Tactics Study.

But there is yet more to be told about Jennifer Jarvis. As I related earlier in the section on Edward Ashpole and the NIDS Essay, I did not have access to the Internet until 1999. This did not deter Jennifer from sending sightings information, sometimes garnered from the Internet, by Air Mail. One day a fat package landed on the floor of our porch. It was a printout, from Jennifer, of much sightings material extracted from the famous Filer’s Files web site. She thought I might like to process some of it. On examination it seemed to be the most comprehensive set of recent reports I could have ever hoped for. The data were for the period 1996/7. I began processing immediately, because I had been presented with an opportunity to investigate how the overall strategy revealed by the AT had been used tactically during any given 24-hour period. The outcome of this prolonged study was very revealing. I discovered how, for example, different paths in space and over the ground had been used to access a given targeted location; how ground tracks with different inclinations but generated from the same equatorial generator had enabled target zones in widely separated global locations to be accessed simultaneously, and so on. One possibility I did not find evidence for was the obvious linking of several global sites by a single track during any 24-hour activity period. (As will be told later, that discovery had to wait until early 1999.)

To summarise this study, a paper was produced in March 1998 with the title,’
GLOBAL U.F.O. ACTIVITY – A STUDY OF TACTICAL TECHNIQUES.’
A copy of this paper was posted off to Jennifer with my thanks for having made the study possible. Jennifer’s excited response was a request for permission to display it on her new web site, which of course I gave very gladly. But that created a big problem for Jennifer. Because my computer equipment was so antiquated and the report was in the Wordstar format, it became necessary for Jennifer to re-type the entire 12-page report, tables and all. Such dedication! The result is that that paper can still be accessed via her ORBWATCH web site.