Petty Treason (38 page)
Authors: Madeleine E. Robins
“But you were right,” Miss Tolerance said.
“I beg your pardon?”
“You were right,” she said again. “It is part of what I have to tell you, and I hope you will understand why I waited as long as I did, when I have told you the whole.”
Sir Walter looked at her in surprise. “Right about what? The newspapers—Heddison’s statement said—”
“An agreeable fiction. There are certain things I learned only after Mr. Heddison had announced his triumph: blame a dead spy and free a brutalized woman. But in the matter of the Chevalier d’Aubigny’s death, the spy was blameless. Anne d’Aubigny killed her husband.”
The magistrate sat back. “Perhaps you will explain.”
Miss Tolerance nodded. Carefully she explained the circumstances of Anne d’Aubigny’s marriage, and the events which had led to d’Aubigny’s death. “Once she began to strike him she kept on until she saw his brains upon the sheet, because she was not certain he would die otherwise. She seems to have believed he had nearly superhuman strength.”
“Then the tale of letters implicating Beauville and Touvois—”
“It was true: Beauville was meant to kill d’Aubigny and steal the letters, but he never found them. Anne d’Aubigny knew nothing of them.”
“If all you tell me is so, the chevalier appears to have reaped what he sowed,” Sir Walter said. “I am all a-maze. But why are you apologizing to me?”
“Why would I not? You said it was the wife, and you were right. I could not keep my feelings from coloring what I saw. I believed Anne d’Aubigny was innocent for no better reason than that I wanted her to be. I saw her as a woman betrayed by the man she loved—”
“Which appears to me to be an accurate reading of the facts. You seem to me to have been correct about most of the facts in the case.” Sir Walter rose from his chair, wineglass in his hand. He did not approach Miss Tolerance; instead, he paced along the far wall, speaking thoughtfully. “We disagreed, and that was not pleasant. That will happen among colleagues. But you seem very intent upon finding yourself guilty.” Miss Tolerance looked at him sharply. Sir Walter said, very gently, “I think you have mistrusted your own judgment for some time. Since last spring, or at least since your testimony at Versellion’s trial.”
“Do you think I have no reason to do so?”
“I think that if you expect your judgment to be entirely unaffected
by your prejudices, you may next expect to achieve sainthood. So you were not entirely right about Anne d’Aubigny. You were not entirely wrong, either.”
by your prejudices, you may next expect to achieve sainthood. So you were not entirely right about Anne d’Aubigny. You were not entirely wrong, either.”
The fire snapped. Miss Tolerance could not find her voice to reply, and was suddenly aware that tears stood in her eyes, ready to fall.
“My dear, if you find your errors intolerable you will have a very hard life.”
Miss Tolerance’s shoulders began to shake. She was perhaps as surprised as Sir Walter to discover that, despite the tears which had rolled silently down her cheeks, she was laughing. It took her some minutes to regain her composure, during which time Sir Walter watched her with an expression of amazement.
“Sir Walter, I hope I never again quarrel with you,” she said at last. “You have a perspective—and a way of stating it—which is … tonic.” She briskly took her handkerchief from her reticule.
Sir Walter poured a little more claret into her glass.
“So: Madame Touvois and Beauville were involved in treason and in the death of Mrs. Vose; the chevalier was a blackmailer; and Anne d’Aubigny, with some justification, it seems to me, dashed her husband’s brains out. Is there anything else you wish to tell me?”
Miss Tolerance thought guiltily of Cumberland, but shook her head.
“Well, this leaves me with the interesting question of how I am to act in this matter.”
Miss Tolerance shook her head. “I think I have spared you that problem.” She was not sure how Sir Walter would take her last bit of news.
“Spared me? How so?”
“Anne d’Aubigny sailed for India this morning.”
Sir Walter opened his mouth and closed it again. He nodded to Miss Tolerance as if in acknowledgment of a point well played. “I could, of course, send a letter to the authorities in India. But from what you tell me it appears that justice, if not the law, has been served.”
Miss Tolerance nodded. “I truly think it has.”
A clock on the mantel ticked through the seconds. Miss Tolerance
turned her wineglass between her fingers but did not drink. She was in great anxiety to know Sir Walter’s mind—and his feelings toward her.
turned her wineglass between her fingers but did not drink. She was in great anxiety to know Sir Walter’s mind—and his feelings toward her.
At last, “Do you know Shakespeare, Miss Tolerance?”
She blinked. “I beg your pardon, sir?”
“Mrs. Siddons is appearing in
Macbeth
at New Covent Garden Theatre tonight. Would you care to see it? Her Lady Macbeth is accounted very fine. I often find, when I am puzzling out human behavior, that recourse to Shakespeare’s plays can make things clearer. I don’t believe there was an emotion or motive that the playwright did not at some point touch upon. Do you find it so?”
Macbeth
at New Covent Garden Theatre tonight. Would you care to see it? Her Lady Macbeth is accounted very fine. I often find, when I am puzzling out human behavior, that recourse to Shakespeare’s plays can make things clearer. I don’t believe there was an emotion or motive that the playwright did not at some point touch upon. Do you find it so?”
Miss Tolerance recognized an olive branch when one was presented to her. “I know but little Shakespeare, Sir Walter. Romeo loved Juliet, I believe, and Hamlet was a melancholy prince. Further than that I dare not venture. I was an indifferent student with an uninspired governess in my schoolroom days.”
“I find that hard to believe,” Sir Walter said.
“‘Tis all too true,” Miss Tolerance said. “But I hope I have somewhat mended my ways.”
“Then you will accompany me?”
Miss Tolerance smiled and sipped her wine. “I would be very happy to, Sir Walter. It is always my pleasure to learn something new.”
Also by Madeleine E. Robins
The Stone War
Point of Honour
“Madeleine Robins writes with rare conviction.”
—
The New York Times
The New York Times
PRAISE FOR
PETTY TREASON
PETTY TREASON
“Robins knows how to whip up a historical pastiche so that it neither violates the reality of the period nor strikes us as off-puttingly arcane. Robins is writing a series that’s shaping up to be a crowd pleaser in the best sense.”
“Sarah may be a ‘Fallen Woman,’ but she’s also clever, resourceful, and highly capable with a sword. She is so well realized that we accept the conceit of a female sleuth—a liberated Elizabeth Bennett, as it were—who fences, wears men’s clothing, and lives behind her aunt’s brothel. One hopes that the delicate hint of romance with the Magistrate Sir Walter Mandif is realized in future novels in this most pleasing and agreeable series.”
—
Publishers Weekly
Publishers Weekly
“An action-packed, suspense-filled read, complete with a nineteenth century heroine reminiscent of the present day Buffy the Vampire Slayer … Sarah is an intriguing and eminently likeable protagonist who dons men’s clothing and fends off attackers with remarkable skill. This smoothly plotted mystery boasts an intricately woven story and historical accuracy. An installment not be
missed.”—Romantic Times BookClub Magazine
(4 stars)
missed.”—Romantic Times BookClub Magazine
(4 stars)
PRAISE FOR
POINT OF HONOUR
POINT OF HONOUR
“Sarah is a fascinating heroine, and Robins surrounds her with equally intriguing secondary characters. Politics, deception, danger, and a bit of romance all come together beautifully in this superb debut.”
—
Booklist
Booklist
“Sarah Tolerance is smart, beautiful, resourceful, tough, and totally believable and real. Murder, prostitution, blackmail, and action are woven perfectly into this tale. I will certainly read the next episode in this series. I’d do so tomorrow if I had it.”
—Stuart M. Kaminsky, bestselling author of the Toby Peters and Inspector Rostnikov novels
“Self-reliant, gutsy, and forthright at a time when women weren’t supposed to be any of those things, Sara Tolerance is a breath of fresh air. I loved
Point of Honor.”
Point of Honor.”
—Barbara D’Amato, author of
Authorized Personnel Only
Authorized Personnel Only
“An elegant Regency romance with an edge and a point.”
—Sarah Smith, author of
The Vanished Child
The Vanished Child
I
n the real world—and friends of the English Regency period will know at once that the world of
Petty Treason
does not take place within the realm of real history—there was an attempt on the life of Ernest, Duke of Cumberland, in May of 1810. Cumberland’s valet, Joseph Sellis, was later found in his room, an apparent suicide, and an inquest found that Sellis had been the assassin and, failing of his object, had taken his own life. However, there were persistent rumors that Cumberland had killed Sellis, either to hush up an affair with Sellis’s wife, or to quash rumors that he had made homosexual advances to the valet. I have, in the self-serving way of writers, twisted the whole business to suit my story, and painted Cumberland darker than he was—although he appears to have been unpleasant enough. A high Tory, he was virulently anti-Catholic and reactionary; he detested the common folk, and they returned his dislike with interest. Mothers were said to have chided their wild daughters by telling them that the Duke of Cumberland would come for them if they did not behave; there were even rumors that he had fathered a child with one of his sisters, the princess Sophia. Cumberland was generally considered to be the real black sheep of the family, but there is absolutely no evidence that he connived at anything so byzantine as
the plot I have laid out here. I will say that the history of George III and his children is filled with the sort of family dysfunction that could keep a panel of psychiatrists busy for years.
n the real world—and friends of the English Regency period will know at once that the world of
Petty Treason
does not take place within the realm of real history—there was an attempt on the life of Ernest, Duke of Cumberland, in May of 1810. Cumberland’s valet, Joseph Sellis, was later found in his room, an apparent suicide, and an inquest found that Sellis had been the assassin and, failing of his object, had taken his own life. However, there were persistent rumors that Cumberland had killed Sellis, either to hush up an affair with Sellis’s wife, or to quash rumors that he had made homosexual advances to the valet. I have, in the self-serving way of writers, twisted the whole business to suit my story, and painted Cumberland darker than he was—although he appears to have been unpleasant enough. A high Tory, he was virulently anti-Catholic and reactionary; he detested the common folk, and they returned his dislike with interest. Mothers were said to have chided their wild daughters by telling them that the Duke of Cumberland would come for them if they did not behave; there were even rumors that he had fathered a child with one of his sisters, the princess Sophia. Cumberland was generally considered to be the real black sheep of the family, but there is absolutely no evidence that he connived at anything so byzantine as
the plot I have laid out here. I will say that the history of George III and his children is filled with the sort of family dysfunction that could keep a panel of psychiatrists busy for years.
English law at the time of
Petty Treason
was less friendly to the accused than American law (or current English law) is. A suspect did not have the right to confront his accusers; he (and his legal representatives) were often unable to find out the nature of the charges or proofs against them; hearsay was quite acceptable evidence; and the suspect did not have the right to testify in his own behalf. There was no such thing as a not-guilty plea, but you could not be tried without your consent. However, prisoners who “stood mute” and did not give consent to trial were frequently
pressed:
laid on a stone table, naked, and piled with stones until they confessed or consented to trial … or died. At a time when the death penalty was commonplace for theft of anything worth more than a shilling, and the last burning on the charge of petit treason was only a couple of decades past, justice depended largely upon the goodwill and common sense of the people administering it. There were no London police per se at the time, either: individual parishes were protected by the Watch, elderly men who patrolled the streets at night. The Public Offices, modeled after the Bow Street magistrate’s office, were an early attempt to put a crime-fighting force in London, but the major tool of law enforcement was the informer, and informers were paid well.
Petty Treason
was less friendly to the accused than American law (or current English law) is. A suspect did not have the right to confront his accusers; he (and his legal representatives) were often unable to find out the nature of the charges or proofs against them; hearsay was quite acceptable evidence; and the suspect did not have the right to testify in his own behalf. There was no such thing as a not-guilty plea, but you could not be tried without your consent. However, prisoners who “stood mute” and did not give consent to trial were frequently
pressed:
laid on a stone table, naked, and piled with stones until they confessed or consented to trial … or died. At a time when the death penalty was commonplace for theft of anything worth more than a shilling, and the last burning on the charge of petit treason was only a couple of decades past, justice depended largely upon the goodwill and common sense of the people administering it. There were no London police per se at the time, either: individual parishes were protected by the Watch, elderly men who patrolled the streets at night. The Public Offices, modeled after the Bow Street magistrate’s office, were an early attempt to put a crime-fighting force in London, but the major tool of law enforcement was the informer, and informers were paid well.
England in 1810 was at war—a condition in which the country had existed off and on for almost thirty years—and a series of bad harvests, coupled with the financial demands of the war and growing industrialization, wrought havoc with the nation’s economy. At this point, there was a growing political tension between those who, like Cumberland, felt that the French (with their frighteningly egalitarian policies) must be vanquished at all costs, and those who believed steps must be taken to ease the pressure on the people of England, who were, after all, supporting the war, and sometimes starving for it.
The more I learn about this period, the more I find there is to learn. While my mistakes and inventions are my own, I have had enormous help and support from a number of people, and I couldn’t have gotten anything right without them. Andrew Sigel
not only enthusiastically embraced Sarah Tolerance and her world, he was invaluable in helping me think out what-ifs of my particular branching off of history. He supplied books, made comments, and was generally a Prince of the Blood. Likewise Greer Gilman, Sherwood Smith, eluki bes shahar, and Gregory Feeley. As always, my thanks to my fencing teachers, Richard Rizk, David Brimmer, T. J. Glenn, Duncan Eagleson, and M. Lucie Chin, whose grace and style have a huge impact on Miss Tolerance’s own. The members of my writers group, as always, were not only supportive but constructive, catching the Big Errors before I made a fool of myself in print.
not only enthusiastically embraced Sarah Tolerance and her world, he was invaluable in helping me think out what-ifs of my particular branching off of history. He supplied books, made comments, and was generally a Prince of the Blood. Likewise Greer Gilman, Sherwood Smith, eluki bes shahar, and Gregory Feeley. As always, my thanks to my fencing teachers, Richard Rizk, David Brimmer, T. J. Glenn, Duncan Eagleson, and M. Lucie Chin, whose grace and style have a huge impact on Miss Tolerance’s own. The members of my writers group, as always, were not only supportive but constructive, catching the Big Errors before I made a fool of myself in print.
My thanks and a wave to the staff at Starbucks (Ninety-third and Broadway in New York City) for cheery greetings, a comfortable space to sit and write, and keeping the coffee coming.
More thanks: again and always to Patrick and Teresa Nielsen Hayden and Anna Genoese, for their generous enthusiasm and editorial acumen; my agent, Valerie Smith, and my publisher, Tom Doherty, for making so many things possible. More thanks to Tor’s design, production, and marketing departments, all of whom labor long and hard in the service of Tor Books (and thanks, in particular, to copy editor S. B. Kleinman, who manages to juggle the antique language in this book with a fine eye for typos, inconsistencies, and momentary lapses on the part of the author). They all make me look good. To my best bud, Claire Eddy, who always seems to have time to help me gnaw on a bit of plot, and to Melissa Singer—both of whom are not only editors but fellow travelers on the working-mom road—the usual love and appreciation. To Steve Popkes, thanks for years of being out there and keeping me honest.
And always, my love to my husband, Danny Caccavo, and our girls, Julie and Rebecca; life with them is always an adventure.
Other books
Desert Rain by Lowell, Elizabeth
Cowboy Redeemed by Parker Kincade
It's Always Been You by Paige, Victoria
Tender savage by Conn, Phoebe
Amy Winehouse by Chas Newkey-Burden
Unspoken by Mari Jungstedt
Taken Home (Lone Star Burn) by Ruth Cardello
Critical by Robin Cook
RUNAWAY TWINS and RUNAWAY TWINS IN ALASKA: BOXED SET by Palamountain, Pete
Wait Till I Tell You by Candia McWilliam