Get Her Off the Pitch! (25 page)

On that night, I can honestly say I loved the England team. When Sheringham hugged Beckham for post-match pictures, I was in tears of joy and pride. As the Italian fans quickly left the stadium in disgust - empty-pocketed, presumably, after flinging anything portable at the rival fans, or onto the pitch - it was a fabulous moment of togetherness for us. We didn't even notice we'd been locked in. England had qualified for the World Cup, and had done it beautifully. David Beckham's cold had got better. Glenn Hoddle was a genius. Ince had been a hero. Adams would live for ever. It was a fine night in Rome. The
carabinieri
, despite all their best efforts, hadn't actually killed anyone. And, just as a sentimental bonus, Gazza had returned to the stadium of his old club Lazio and shown them what he could do when he was trying.

Too much has already been written by genuine life-long football fans about the exquisite misery of the long-suffering
supporter. The tiny ups and the lengthy downs, the heartbreak, the locking oneself in a shed for five years. So as a way of dealing with my bitter disillusionment with England, I'll just get Alan Shearer off my chest, because it was such a curious thing, the way I quite quickly grew to loathe that man, and to rant at anyone who dared to stand up for him. Now that Shearer's England captaincy is in the past, I find I can put the whole thing behind me. On my desk as I write this is a little model of Shearer in Newcastle strip which I look at regularly for inspiration. People with cruelly good memories will gladly remind me that, during Euro 96, I not only offered myself as mother to Alan Shearer's children, I even had a happy dream about him working in a furniture shop. But in the dark days of 2000, if he was named man of the match, I would say, ‘Oh for Pete's sake, what's wrong with you people, don't you have
eyes
?' and heartily spit on the floor.

I blamed him, you see. He was captain of a consistently under-performing England team. At a time when it was fashionable to refer to certain individual players (such as Eric Cantona) as ‘talismanic', Shearer's personality seemed to influence the England team, and in only negative ways. In Shearer's image, England was mean, dirty, tight-lipped, bullet-headed and pointy-elbowed. It expected to get away with stuff, and huffed when it didn't. It had all the grace and daintiness of a bulldozer. It was opportunistic instead of inventive. It waddled instead of ran, and always had its arm up in appeal for a penalty. It didn't deign to look sideways or backwards. Its goal-scoring record in no way justified its arrogantly high opinion of itself. Worst of all, in a world of sexy football, beautiful football, and lanky,
nifty football, it was resolutely unattractive. Basically, it had thick white yeoman legs with hairs on the backs of its knees.

What really got to me about Alan Shearer, however (oh yes, there's more), was that different rules seemed to apply to him. This was the thing that drove me crazy. He fouled all the time, yet he wasn't booked or sent off. He played half-heartedly, yet he wasn't substituted. He seemed to exert a power that wasn't commensurate with his true value as a footballer. What was going on? Did he know where bodies were buried? Why was everyone scared of him? Famously, when Ruud Gullit dared to leave him out of the Newcastle team, the decision was interpreted as an extreme folly for which Gullit would (and did) rightfully pay with his job. Some might argue that the loyalty shown to Shearer by a succession of England managers is sufficient evidence of his worth. And to be fair, many people told me I was barking up the wrong tree, and that having Shearer leading the England team from the front gave it bulldog qualities of strength and purpose. ‘Alan Shearer knows where the goal is,' they would say, meaningfully. But at the height of my Shearer obsession, I considered such arguments mere propaganda. It seemed really obvious to me that the non-negotiability of having Shearer in attack was limiting England's options in disastrous ways. Why did tactics - and team selection - have to be tailored to suit this bloke? Why was he exempt from criticism? Why was he untouchable? Why did no blame attach to him after St Etienne, when it was his foul on the Argentinian goalkeeper that lost the match for England (when Sol Campbell's goal was disallowed, and Argentina ran off and
scored while England were still celebrating)? I remember a Football Writers' Dinner where I was lucky enough to sit next to Ted Beckham (David's dad), and instead of asking him to marry me (what a wasted opportunity), I just moaned on and on to him about Bloody Alan Shearer.

The last match I attended for
The Times
was in October 2000, a few days after my sister's funeral. And the good news is: Alan Shearer wasn't in it. However, the bad news is: it was still unwatchably awful, so he might just as well have been. His mean little spirit still hovered above it. It was a 2002 World Cup qualifier against Germany at Wembley (the first of our campaign), and even on first sight it seemed to contain every ingredient for a paradigmatically miserable afternoon of English football. Somebody had decided to make this a celebratory occasion by entitling the match ‘The Final Whistle', but this was never going to be a party, no matter how many Cross of St George flags were sold to unsuspecting children down on Wembley Way, and no matter how many times the aggravatingly upbeat stadium announcer played ‘Three Lions' over the PA and yelled, ‘The world will be watching! It's a family occasion! It's a World Cup qualifier! Don't run off at the end of the match, we've got a show that's fantastic!' This was, you see, to be the last match played at the old Wembley before demolition, and equivocal feelings abounded. It was, on the one hand, rather melancholy to reflect that the ghostly echoes from 1966 of ‘They think it's all over' would be silenced for ever by the wrecking ball; on the other hand, the place was dank, stinky and
uncomfortable and deserved to be struck by lightning. When the Red Arrows failed to show up (pleading weather conditions), one could only applaud their good taste. Nothing to celebrate here, mate. Nothing to celebrate here. You mark my words, the England fans will soon be singing, ‘Stand up if you won the war,' because it will be the only pathetic little straw they can grasp at.

Why anyone thought an England-Germany game with important points attached to it would make a suitable last fixture for the old place, I couldn't imagine. True, they couldn't have predicted it would be cold and raining, but they must surely have known we would lose. England's performance in Euro 2000 had been pretty terrible, and it was clear by now that, as manager, Kevin Keegan had only ever had one idea: build the team around Alan Shearer and see what happens. By this point, sadly, Keegan's supposed motivational skills were no longer a source of wonder. His talent for tactical idiocy, however, was universally acknowledged; in fact it was reckoned to be unsurpassed at this level of the game. On this occasion, for a World Cup qualifier against the Germans, Keegan put out a midfield of three - Beckham, Scholes and Barmby - and set Southgate the task of patrolling behind them. In the press box, some of the blokes looked at this lineup and put their heads in their hands. It was the work of a madman. It was insane.

Personally, I cried. I never stopped crying, in fact. This being a few days after my sister's funeral, I started crying because of personal circumstances, obviously - but there seemed to be no practical reason to cheer up once I'd started, so I didn't. On arrival, I realised that I'd been
allocated a seat next to Brian Glanville, a veteran football writer of high renown, tangled ascetic appearance and haughty intellectual condescension, who had never made a secret of his dislike for me (sometimes he even did it in Italian). A couple of years before, at a Charlton game, he'd been given my ticket by mistake, and when a steward asked him for it he'd said, rather shockingly, ‘If I'd known it was for her, I'd have torn it up.' Now, for four years fortune had spared me the necessity of sitting next to Brian Glanville, but naturally I had kept myself keenly prepared for the eventuality. By way of practice, for example, I had recently dealt quite successfully with one of his like-minded woman-hostile colleagues, by saying as I sat down, ‘Look, I'll only say this once. But if there's anything you don't understand,
just ask
.' It would have given me considerable satisfaction to say something similar to Brian Glanville. One day the opportunity would arise, I was sure of it. I was ready for him. I had nothing to lose.

But today, when I saw him sitting there in the next seat - damn it, I just welled up and cried. And since he steadfastly ignored me (possibly in Italian), I felt I had full permission to give vent to all my feelings. In this noisy stadium, no one would notice, after all. So I cried throughout the pre-match stuff, which included a playing of ‘Jerusalem' (which had been sung at my sister's funeral). I cried during the fireworks, which we couldn't see because it was daylight, and in any case, they were on the roof. I cried with everyone else when I saw the team sheet. I cried when I spotted the Wembley groundsman, with whom I'd once spent a really pleasant day learning about sports turf management; I cried when the England fans booed the
German national anthem; I cried right through the match and the half-time sandwich, cup of tea and orange-flavoured Club biscuit. And after the defeat, when Kevin Keegan announced his resignation as England coach, I cried at that as well, not because it was such a shock but because it was the opposite: it was so miserably inevitable. When you are in a state combining personal grief with despair for England, nothing is a surprise, you see; bad things just confirm your worst fears. So
of course
Keegan would choose this moment to quit the England job. Hadn't he abandoned clubs and jobs all his life? Hadn't I been saying he would do this at the worst moment, when we had another vital qualifying match in just a few days' time? Wasn't that just
typical
of him to slink off but dress it up as the honourable thing?

In a way, though, I reckon it was fitting that I should spend the whole of my last ever football match openly piping the eye and wringing out tissues. Sport doesn't permit a really good cry, and I had begun to think that this was one of the main things wrong with it. Although it's a widely acknowledged fact that watching sport is an emotionally gruelling business, isn't there an unsatisfactory gap where the catharsis ought to be? You get all worked up - and then, because no one dies, you gradually calm down again and nurse a curious sense of emptiness. People sometimes say that sport educates the emotions, but the range of feelings it promotes is pathetically small, when you think about it. Anxiety, frustration, unbearable misery and almighty relief - that's about it. Whenever the subject of ‘Is sport the new religion?' came up in my day, I'd say no, or at least it's no substitute, because sport is designed
to make people anxious whereas religion is supposed to do the opposite. Watching sport is about placing your temporary emotional well-being in the hands of a bunch of fallible athletes; religion makes you put faith in an infallible God for the sake of your own ultimate spiritual security. The fact that people make ‘gods' out of footballers is merely a symptom of paltry understanding and bad taste. When Kevin Keegan had made his flit from Newcastle in January 1997, the quasi-religious grieving was quite shocking. Fans with fresh ‘
RIP
' tattoos on their stomachs hung around outside St James' Park, hoping to see him rise again. One fan pledged to explain about Keegan to his toddlers ‘when they were old enough'. ‘He Never Forgot Ordinary People', ran the headline in a local Newcastle paper. At the time, Keegan was advertising Sugar Puffs on the telly, and in this climate of religiosity I remember thinking it would have been quite a simple matter to change the Sugar Puffs slogan to ‘Eat these and think of me'.

But the very reason sport is so ascendant in our day, I reckon, is that its drama requires such shallow emotional engagement. It isn't very complicated. It is self-centred. It's unhappy/happy. It's lose/win. Empathy doesn't really come into it, let alone anything so profound and human as pity. Sport legitimises quite shameful feelings such as naked triumphalism and - especially when German people are involved in a rare defeat, tee hee -
schadenfreude
. Sometimes we might feel sorry for losers, but it's up to us; it's optional. I remember quite a yelling match I had on the night of England-Argentina in 1998, when my boss called from London and told me to focus on Beckham's red card, and the issue of pity came up at an extremely
bad moment. This sending-off incident was one of the lowest points of my sports writing career, I must confess - not for what it represented in the history of English football, but because it happened right in front of me and I missed it. I was bent over my keyboard at the time, and looked up only when I heard the roar from the crowd and the yelled expletives from all round me in the press box. What I saw on the pitch was Beckham inexplicably untucking his shirt and striding off.
What?
The crowd was going mad.
What on earth -?
People in the press box were hopping up and down. And I just sat there, swallowing and blinking; waiting for an explanatory replay on a nearby monitor, and all the time thinking, ‘If I ask what just happened, I'm dead.'

Anyway, back in London they wanted me to ‘go for' Beckham. They had obviously mistaken me for some rottweiler alter ego, who went for people. I don't know. I can't explain it. I just knew it was pointless asking me to call for David Beckham to be burned in effigy, and that, luckily, I worked for a newspaper that would not insert the words ‘I hereby call for him to be burned in effigy' unless I actually wrote them. And I wouldn't. ‘If we lose this, they'll crucify him!' my boss yelled. (He was hoarse by the end of the night from yelling to his troops in the cacophony of St Etienne.) And I yelled back, hopelessly, ‘But I feel sorry for him!' And he'd shout, ‘He did something really stupid!' And I'd shout, ‘Pardon?' And he'd shout, ‘He deserves what's coming to him!' And I'd shout, ‘That's why I feel sorry for him!' I had to re-file my piece twice because it wasn't strong enough, but I still refused to have a go. I said Beckham was incredibly talented, and it was tragic
that there was nothing he could do to repair his mistake. In the end, the last edition went and my voiceless boss was obliged to forgive me my milksop girlie failings; characteristically, he never referred to the incident again.