For Roman Catholics in the Christian Social Party, religious issues were still important, although by no means the only areas of conflict with Jews. To be more exact, however, it was not so much the Jewish religion that bothered Christian Socials, as it was their apparent lack of it. Relations between the Christian Social Party and Orthodox Jews and Zionists remained reasonably "correct," thus encouraging both Jewish groups to imagine that their philosophies of self-defense would save them against all antiSemites in the future.
|
The indignation of Christian Socials was aimed not at those Jews who wished to withdraw at least partially from the Christian community, but at secularized Jews who wanted to play an active role in Austrian politics and culture, particularly those who had joined the Socialist Party, and most of all the Jewish leaders of the SDAP. The complete separation of church and state, including the removal of most religious influences from public schools, which was advocated by the Austrian Socialists, seemed to threaten the very foundations of Catholicism and the traditional values of the bourgeoisie.
|
Pan-Germans in the Greater German People's Party, the paramilitary Front Fighters' Association, part of the equally paramilitary Austrian Heimwehr, and the Nazi Party also rejected Jewish secularism. For them, however, the ultimate source of Jewish wickedness lay not in any free-will decision a Jew might make, but in their "racial characteristics." Marxists could easily accept Jews who renounced capitalism. Catholics always claimed to reject racial antiSemitism and in theory would welcome any Jew who converted to Catholicism. But a true-believing racial antiSemite would never accept someone who had so much as a single drop of "Jewish" blood in his veins.
|
The difference between panGerman nationalists and Catholics on the question of race or even religious, cultural, and economic issues should not be exaggerated, however. It is true that Catholic moderates like Ignaz Seipel and Theodor Cardinal Innitzer, or for that matter a not-so-moderate Catholic like the Reichspost editor, Friedrich Funder, had little difficulty accepting Jewish converts into the fold. The same could not be said, however, for hard-core antiSemites like Leopold Kunschak or Anton Orel who would at most tolerate converted Jews only after several generations. On the other hand, moderate nationalists like Johannes Schober had cordial relations with Jews.
|
As a political weapon antiSemitism had a wide variety of uses. Marxists employed it to point out the hypocrisy of Christian Socials who denounced Jews and demanded anti-Semitic legislation, but accepted baptized Jews into the party and did not enact any anti-Semitic legislation. Christian Socials and panGermans tried to create dissension between Socialist workers and their leadership by saying that the proletariat was being led by alien and unpatriotic
|
|