Read Ultimate Explanations of the Universe Online
Authors: Michael Heller
Tags: #Philosophy, #Epistemology, #Science, #Cosmology
|
14. http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=206453&pageno=78 |
|
15. http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=206453&pageno=78 |
|
16. M. Planck, “Das Prinzip der kleinsten Wirkung,” Kultur der Gegenwart , Leipzig: B.G. Teubner, 1915 . |
|
17. Monadologie 40 http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibmon.pdf |
|
18. Monadologie 41 http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibmon.pdf |
|
19. G.W. Leibniz, On the True Theologia Mystica. Philosophical Papers and Letters , ed. and trans. Leroy Loemker, Reidel, 1969 ,p. 368 . |
|
20. Leibniz’s third letter to Clarke, 25 February 1716 , 6 . Trans. Jonathan Bennett. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibclar.pdf |
|
21. Ibid. 4. |
|
22. We may assume that by writing about things that are “coexistent”Leibniz meant “simultaneous.”However in the above quotation he did not want to use the word “simultaneous,”since simultaneity cannot have a sense until it is specified what is meant by “time.”Andrzej Staruszkiewicz and I have published our reading of Leibniz’s polemic with Clarke in “Polemika Leibniza z Clarke’iem w świetle współczesnej fizyki,”[Leibniz’s Polemic with Clarke in the Light of Modern Physics] Wieczność, czas, kosmos [Eternity, Time, Cosmos (in Polish)], Kraków: Znak, 1995 , pp. 41 –54 . |
|
23. For more on this subject, see my book Filozofiai Wszechświat [Philosophy and the Universe (in Polish)], Kraków: Universitas, 2006, especially Part II. |
|
24. Theodicée http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=206453&pageno=82 |
|
25. M. Dummett, What Is Mathematics About?” Philosophy of Mathematics. An Anthology , ed. D. Jacquette, Oxford: Blackwell, 2002 , pp. 19 –29, quoted from p. 22 . |
|
CHAPTER 19 |
1. I discussed this problem more extensively in Chap. 20 of my book Granice kosmosuikosmologii [The Boundaries of the Cosmos and Cosmology (in Polish)], Warszawa: Scholar, 2005 . For more see R. Geroch, G.T. Horowitz, “Global Structure of Spacetime,” General Relativity. An Einstein Centenary Survey , eds. S.W. Hawking, W. Israel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 212 –293. |
|
2. In the theory of relativity an object’s length depends on the choice of a reference system; so we are not talking about the length of the curve but the possibility of its extension in a strictly defined sense. |
|
3. It is assumed that no domain has been artificially removed from this space-time. This assumption is of course given a mathematical formulation. |
|
4. At least that’s what it seemed at the time when the singularity theorems were being formulated. Currently opinions on “what is physically realistic”i n very early stages of the universe’s evolution have undergone a significant change (see below). |
|
5. S. Hawking, G. Ellis, The Large-Scale Structure of Space-Time , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973 ,p. 364. |
|
6. I have written more extensively on the singularities and the latest research on them in “Cosmological Singularity and the Creation of the Universe,” Creative Tension , Philadelphia & London: Templeton Foundation Press, 2003 , pp. 79–99 . |
|
7. Which we may do only for the sake of discussion, since it can hardly be assumed that in very dense states of the universe gravitation will not manifest its quantum features. |
|
CHAPTER 20 |
1. S.C. Morris. Life’s Solution. Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 ,p. 12 . |
|
2. We made some preliminary remarks on this subject in Chap. 12. |
|
3. I have written more extensively on this subject in Chap. 3 of my book Filozofia i Wszechświat [Philosophy and the Universe (in Polish)], Kraków: Universitas, 2006 . |
|
4. See, for instance, M. Rédei, S.J. Summers, “Quantum Probability Theory,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 , 2007, pp. 390 –417. |
|
5. Cf. D.V. Voiculescu, K. Dykema, A. Nica, Free Random Variables , CRM Monograph Series, Vol. 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1992 . |
|
6. E. McMullin, “Evolutionary Contingency and Cosmic Purpose,” Studies in Science and Theology 5 , 1997 , pp. 91– 112; the quoted passage is on pp. 106–107 . |
|
7. Ibid. |
|
CHAPTER 21 |
1. R.L. Kuhn, “Why This Universe? Toward a Taxonomy of Possible Explanations,” Skeptic 13, No. 2 , 2007, pp. 28 –39. |
|
2. Ibid., p. 28 . |
|
3. English translation © Jonathan Bennett http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibphg.pdf |
|
4. Leibniz regards his monadology as the foundation of physics, but in fact it is a purely metaphysical doctrine. |
|
5. Op. cit. 7 . Parts of sentence originally stressed by Leibniz italicised in the translation. |
|
6. Ibid. |
|
7. Ibid., 8 . |
|
8. Cf. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, , http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness |
|
9. We don't even have a statement to say that nothing exists, for there is no-one capable of formulating such a statement. |
|
10. Cf. footnote 19 in the cited article by R.L. Kuhn. |
|
11. However, we should not forget that mathematics is not just a language; I have written on this subject in Filozofia i Wszechświat [Philosophy and the Universe (in Polish)], Kraków: Universitas, 2006 (see especially Chaps. 5 and 6 ). |
|
12. W.V. Quine, “On What There Is.” From a Logical Point of View , Harvard University Press, 1964 ,p. 16. |
|
13. P. van Inwagen, “Why Is There Anything At All?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70 , 1996 , pp. 95–110 . |
|
14. Of course we could define the probability distribution function in the set of all universes (on condition that it exists in that set – see in Chap. 12 Sect. 3 ) in such away as to define the probability of the occurrence of an empty world as zero – but that would be begging the question. |
|
15. H. Eilstein, Bibliawreku ateisty (in Polish), Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN: Warszawa, 2006 . The book does not appear to have been published in an English translation up to now (2009 ). |
|
16. All the passages cited in this sub-chapter come from pp. 115 to 117 in Eilstein’s book. |
|
EPILOGUE |
1. J.A. Kloczowski, “Teologia negatywna – miaądzy dialektyk a ( a mistyka ( ,”[Negative Theology: Between Dialectics and Mysticism (in Polish)] Znak No. 613, 2006, pp. 71–94. |
|
2. The aim of cataphatic theology, the reverse of apophatic theology, is to make a positive statement on God. |
|
3. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , English translation by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness, Project Gutenberg online edition http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext04/tloph10.txt |
|