with its insistence on "sacrificial self-denial," and in messianic socialism, with its "magnetic" dream of utopian plenitude. In each case, abstract, implacable justice serves as the guiding principle. As Steiner says, ''Unceasingly, the blackmail of perfection has hammered at the confused, mundane, egotistical fabric of common, instinctual behavior." 39 And when the essentially Jewish demand for perfection upon the consciousness of the West grew unbearable,
|
| | Deep loathing built up in the social subconscious, murderous resentments. The mechanism is simple but primordial. We hate most those who hold out to us a goal, an ideal, a visionary promise which, even though we have stretched our muscles to the utmost, we cannot reach, which slips, again and again, just out of range of our racked fingersyet, and this is crucial, which remains profoundly desirable, which we cannot reject because we fully acknowledge its supreme value . In his exasperating "strangeness," in his acceptance of suffering as part of a covenant with the absolute, the Jew became, as it were, the "bad conscience of Western history." 40
|
The result is not merely the death of God, but the attempted annihilation of His people"an attempt to level the futureor, more precisely, to make history commensurate with the natural savageries, intellectual torpor, and material instincts of unextended man." 41 Hell, long envisioned in graphic detail by the Western imagination, is made manifest in the camps.
|
This awful, elegant theory demonstrates Steiner's messianism to the fullest extent. Steiner chooses to label the Holocaust a second Fall, but the aura that surrounds his meditation is surely apocalyptic. For the earlier generation of Jewish messianists, apocalypse, with its "complete destruction and negation of the old order," produces "a quantum leap from present to future, from exile to freedom." 42 But Steiner, following after and attempting to explain the Holocaust, perceives an apocalypse that has gone terribly awry: destruction and negation have not cleansed civilization (as would be the case in an idealized Marxist revolution) but have besmirched it. Apocalyptic violence does not usher in utopia but signifies an atavistic return of primal brutality, what in theological terms could only be considered total corruption and sin. Instead of a rupture with profane history, a clean break with the past, humanity fails the test of transcendence, and history, a long passage of spiritual suppuration interspersed with unbearable ethical
|
|