book. In the Jew, the book itself becomes Jewish words. Because for him, the book is more than confirmation, it is the revelation of his Judaism." 4 In these lines, Edmond Jabès, typically, does not specify the book he means. By now, the "secular" Jewish writera Bloom, a Jabèsthinks less of Scripture than of the processes through which Scripture has been disseminated. Regardless of what normative Judaism still has to offer, Walter Benjamin's commentary on Kafka remains paradigmatic for all Jewish intellectuals who cannot accept the old ways:
|
| | The gate to justice is learning. And yet Kafka does not dare attach to this learning the promises which tradition has attached to the study of the Torah. His assistants are sextons who have lost their house of prayer, his students are pupils who have lost the Holy Writ. Now there is nothing to support them on their "untrammeled, happy journey." 5
|
And so (to momentarily conflate Jabès and Benjamin), "the Jew bends over his book" and goes, however ironically, on his "untrammeled, happy journey." This book is the record of one such journey.
|
So in writing this book I returned to certain authors, certain texts, certain motifs again and again, and my readers surely will note such obsessive, such ecstatic repetitions. All commentary, as I have come to understand it, requires repetition; it produces Kierkegaard's "remembering forward" or Bloom's "misreading" through which commentators can, in the full paradox of the word, say something original . My title will serve as an example. Readers familiar with Scholem (one of those figures with whom I am most obsessed) will recognize in it the key terms from the title of his "Tradition and New Creation in the Ritual of the Kabbalists.'' In this essay, Scholem demonstrates how the Kabbalists subtly reworked the rituals of remembrance and sanctification which they found in rabbinic Judaism into transformative, magical rituals. "The existing ritual was not changed," Scholem tells us. "It was taken over more or less intact." 6 The Kabbalists, given their passionate mythical intentions, followed out the sober, inherited rituals, but changed them from within. The result was a new creation that still accorded itself with the old ways.
|
The historical dialectics of religious thought and cultural attitude are subtle and full of irony: as Scholem argues, the messianic crisis of kabbalism, culminating in the Sabbatian debacle, may well have moved Judaism closer to the Haskalah and to its great receptivity
|
|