THE LUTE AND THE SCARS (13 page)

No more and no less so than other people. If he had been told this earlier, two or three years ago, he would not have paid any attention to it
: These two sentences were omitted from the first publication of the story (
Srpski knji
ž
evni glasnik
, 1, 1992).

Jurij Golec

In the last three of the seven tables of contents for
The Encyclopedia of the Dead
, the titles
“
Jurij Golec
”
and
“
The Lute and the Scars
”
both appear, in this order. In the seventh table of contents, both titles are crossed out by hand. Why were both removed, even though they dovetail with the basic theme of the book (both find their
“
metaphysical bearings
”
in love and death)? The reason (the only reason for which material evidence can be adduced) should perhaps be sought in the radical shift in style that comes from adjusting to their autobiographical, non-fictional character. In their stead
“
Red Stamps with Lenin
’
s Picture
”
appeared at the last minute. We say
“
last minute
”
because the title of this other story is not found in any of the tables of contents, something that indicates that it was added to the manuscript just before it was turned over to the publisher. This piece of
“
fantasy
”
combines the worlds of the two stories while hewing more closely to the style of the whole
Encyclopedia
. Whether or not the inclusion of
“
Stamps
”
necessitated the exclusion of the other two stories for purely literary reasons is a question of another order, and one that does not lie within the scope of these notes.

The story
“
Jurij Golec
”
is preserved in manuscript form in four versions (not counting the layers of
“
palimpsests
”
created by revisions in the author
’
s hand), totaling one hundred and nineteen typed pages, to which should be added fifty-five additional pieces of paper with variations on individual passages or notes and sketches. The sequence of the versions can be established with little difficulty. The first comprises twenty-six pages and has the title
“
The Actor
”
; the second, untitled version is forty pages long. Both of these versions contain only the first half of the story. The third version, and the fourth, definitive one, both bearing the title
“
Jurij Golec,
”
are of almost equal length (27 and 26 pp.). The fundamental differences between the four versions are the visible reduction in text and the replacement of real personal names with fictitious names or initials. The basic technical issue, which is the main reason that multiple versions exist, is how to depict dialogue without narrative lulls or awkwardness. The customary forms
“
she said,
”
“
he said,
”
or
“
I said,
”
and so forth, are reduced to an absolute minimum (and in the final text are only used when needed for rhythm or comprehension). The basic events, characters, and situations, however, remained unchanged.

In view of the fact that this story was planned to be a part of
The Encyclopedia of the Dead
, Ki
š
wrote a note that was supposed to be included in a general postscript, which we have appended to the story in this volume, rather than place here among the notes. It was our view that the subsequent revelation of the hero
’
s identity retrospectively underscored the nonfictional nature of the story, whereas the typical novelistic feature of a
“
note
”
would broaden to too great a degree the world of the basic narrative. In terms of form, we find this is justified by the fact that the story
“
The Short Biography of A.A. Darmolatov
”
(in
A Tomb for Boris Davidovich
) concludes with an italicized postscript.

The Lute and the Scars

“
The Lute and the Scars
”
was also conceived as part of
The Encyclopedia of the Dead
. We have already made mention (see previous note) of some of our hypotheses about the reasons this story, as was the case with
“
Jurij Golec,
”
did not make it into the collection. Two versions are preserved in manuscript form: the first, without a title, contains seventeen typed pages (fifteen of which are sequentially paginated, though among them are inserted two pages with the designations
“
2a
”
and
“
6a
”
); the second, entitled
“
The Lute and the Scars,
”
consists of fourteen unfilled pages. Versions of the introductory section of the story make up most of the content of another sixteen pages. And, again, it is to the story itself that we attached the
“
note
”
that was foreseen as a general postscript. In this case we acted with much greater hesitation than with
“
Jurij Golec.
”
The reasons were that this note has primarily a theoretical and meta-textual function: it specifies the genre (creative nonfiction), with an additional reference to the story
“
Jurij Golec.
”
The gulf between Ki
š
’
s narration and his commentary is much wider here. The fact is, however, that the word
“
note
”
itself seems intended to strengthen, even to guarantee, the truthfulness of the story (even, if nothing else, by comparison with the foregoing story, in which the inclusion of the fictional was a kind of obligation).

Let us now shift our attention to the thematic uniqueness of this story in the context of Ki
š
’
s literary oeuvre: this is the only piece that one could label a
“
Belgrade story.
”
The piece was written at the start of 1983, as a late look back at his own younger years, with a double distancing from the objects he is describing: in terms of space, since at that time Ki
š
was living in Paris, and likewise at a chronological remove (the story takes place during the 1950s, with one episode from the end of the 1960s). Everything in the piece is tied up with a quintessential story of emigration, the roots of which reach back to the Russian Revolution. And it is precisely this aspect of the story that links it, along with
“
The Book of Kings and Fools
”
(from
The Encyclopedia of the Dead
), to the world of
A Tomb for Boris Davidovich
. The reference to
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
is not simply part and parcel of Ki
š
’
s memories of his youth (and an indirect reference to two treatments of the subject that Ki
š
penned much earlier, both published in the newspaper
Ovdje
(Here):
“
On C
é
line
”
from April 1971 and
“
Anti-Semitism as a Way of Looking at the World
”
from June of the same year), but also a representation of the subtle affinities between these two stories. (For example, the profession of the hero of
“
The Book of Kings and Fools,
”
Belogortsev
—
a forestry engineer
—
along with a few other details that the attentive reader will unearth.)

The Poet

Although the title
“
The Poet
”
is not mentioned in any of the tables of contents for
The Encyclopedia of the Dead
, one handwritten fragment, found among texts that can with certainty be linked to that book, shows us to be justified in placing the story into this context. This is the fragment:

On the back of one page of notes to
“
Jurij Golec
”
we find the following written by hand:

The manuscript of
“
The Poet
”
consists of thirteen continuously paginated typed pages. Corrections were made in three rounds: with a pencil and with fine blue and black ballpoint pens. There are no other related papers: the story came into existence in one sitting, with only superficial changes.

The appearance of this story among Ki
š
’
s short fiction is not, however, accidental. Traces of his reflections on the postwar years are to be seen in his notes, in his sketches of imaginative literary subjects, and in fragmentary autobiographical notes relating to the Cetinje period of the author
’
s life. From among the large number of such notes we will reproduce here a few that correspond to this story:

In addition, we include a short character sketch:

Subsequent to the first publication of this story in the initial edition of the collection
The Lute and the Scars,
we found amid some newspaper clippings a bundle of Ki
š
’
s papers that contained several relevant items, including a bibliography that the author undoubtedly composed in the course of preparing his collected works. On one sheet from this bundle we found the following note that indicates the
“
sources
”
of this story, its nonfictional background:

(So much for needing to research the relationship between an anecdote and a piece of fiction . . .)

The Debt

The story
“
The Debt
”
is preserved among Ki
š
’
s manuscript papers on a total of seventeen typewritten pages. The complete manuscript of the version we provide here contains twelve numbered pages; in the middle of the first is the typed title
“
The Debt.
”
Four of the additional pages present what is in all likelihood a second version of the beginning of the story, in this case with no title indicated. On a separate page, on which the title is also to be found, there are simply five lines, which can be regarded as another variant of the start of the story.

Corrections on the twelve-page manuscript were carried out with a pencil throughout the entire text, with the majority of these occurring in the introductory section that precedes the enumeration of the
“
debts.
”
These corrections, judging by their apparent uniformity, were carried out in a single reading of the manuscript. The other corrections, decidedly fewer in number, were made in fine blue ballpoint pen (the story therefore seems most likely to have gone through only two revisions). The unfinished nature of certain sentences, which we encounter from the first pages of the story, along with superficial corrections that seem to be
“
final touches
”
—
these all demonstrate that Ki
š
’
s opinion of the introductory section was that it was only a temporary resolution. In the portion of the story where the enumerations occur, there are virtually no corrections of any kind, which shows that the frame-narrative was what caused the most problems for Ki
š
; once the list begins, the only narrative events are those concerned with the debts, and the underlying concept that life is passing before the protagonist
’
s eyes by means of this inventory, all of which was drafted without the least difficulty or deficiency (the process of enumeration that was so dear to Ki
š
). To judge by the large number of sentences beginning on one page and concluding on the next, we could even say that the story was produced in one session.