The Kill Clause (12 page)

Dumone used both arms to help himself out of the chair. He headed over to a collection of bottles on a shelf behind the desk. “Can I get you a drink, Mr. Rackley? Christ knows, I need one.” He winked.

Tim looked from face to face, searching for some hint of levity. “This is not a joke.” He realized his remark sounded closer to a statement than a question.

“It would certainly be an elaborate one and a considerable waste of time if it were,” Rayner said. “Suffice it to say, none of us have a lot of time on our hands.”

The ticktock of the grandfather clock was slightly unnerving.

“So, Mr. Rackley,” Dumone said, “what do you think?”

“I think you’ve all been watching too many Dirty Harry movies.” Tim dropped the RF emitter wand into his bag and zipped it up. “I want nothing to do with vigilante retribution.”

“Of course not,” Ananberg said. “We would never ask you to engage in such activities. Vigilantes are outside the law. We’re an adjunct to it.” She crossed her legs, lacing her hands over a knee. Her
voice was soothing and had the practiced cadence of a newscaster’s. “You see, Mr. Rackley, we have an immense luxury here. We can concern ourselves exclusively with the merits of a given case and the culpability of the defendant. We needn’t stand on procedural formalities or permit them to get in the way of justice. Courts regularly have to make rulings irrelevant to the merits. They’re not always ruling on the case itself—they’re ruling preemptively to deter illegal or improper government conduct in the future. They know that if they overlook warrant limitations or Miranda rights even once, it can set a precedent that will open the way for the government to act without regard for individual rights. And that is a valid and compelling concern.” She spread her hands. “For them.”

“Constitutional guarantees will still function,” Dumone said. “We’re not in conflict with them. We’re not the state.”

“You understand firsthand how complex Fourth Amendment search-and-seizure issues have grown,” Rayner said. “It’s gotten to the point that good-faith efforts by the police fall short. The system’s rough patches aren’t due to crooked cops who feel they’re above the law, or bleeding-heart knee-jerk judges. These are men and women like you and me, of good conscience and fair temperament, who are seeking to uphold a system that’s increasingly undercut by its neurotic fear of victimizing the accused.”

Robert finally chimed in with a smoker’s voice, his hands flaring in disgust. “An honest cop can’t even fire a shot without being waylaid by an internal investigation, shooting board…”

“Maybe a criminal and civil case on top of that,” Mitchell said.

Dumone spoke coolly, mitigating some of the twins’ sharpness. “We need those people, and we need the system. We also need something else.”

“We’ll be tied not to the letter of the law but the spirit.” Rayner gestured to the sculpture of Blind Justice on the desk. Their prop.

Tim noted how carefully orchestrated the presentation was. The affluent milieu, designed to impress and intimidate him, the arguments laid out succinctly, the language heavy on law and logic—Tim’s language. The speakers hadn’t so much as interrupted one another. Yet despite their skillful maneuvering, they also evinced circumspection and righteousness. Tim felt like a buyer annoyed with the salesman’s pitch but still interested in the car.

“You’re not a jury of their peers,” Tim said.

“That’s right,” Rayner said. “We’re a jury of intelligent, discerning citizens.”

Robert said, “I don’t know if you’ve ever seen a jury, but lemme tell
you—they ain’t your peers. They’re a group of sorry-ass individuals with nothing better to do on a workday and no brains to fabricate an excuse to duck duty.”

“But you’d be lying to say you don’t have biases. Your system is flawed, too.”

“Isn’t everything?” Rayner said. “The question is, is our system
less
flawed?”

Tim took this in silently.

“Why don’t you sit down, Mr. Rackley?” Ananberg said.

Tim didn’t budge. “Do you have an investigative arm?”

“That’s the beauty of our system,” Rayner said. “We’ll address only those cases that have already gone to court—cases in which suspects were let off due to procedural technicalities. These cases tend to have exhaustive evidence and reports already in the dockets, court transcripts, and case binders.”

“And if they don’t?”

“If they don’t, we won’t touch them. We’re aware of our limitations—we don’t consider ourselves equipped to deal with more complex investigation and evidence gathering. If the proof isn’t all there, we happily defer to the court’s decision.”

“How do you get the court files and case binders?”

“The court files are public record. But I have several judges—close friends—who send me materials relevant to my research. They enjoy seeing their names in the acknowledgments of my books.” He worked something off one of his cuff links with a fingernail. “Never underestimate vanity.” A self-aware grin. “And we have certain arrangements—untraceable arrangements—with temps, mailroom workers, clerks, and the like, positioned advantageously in DA and PD offices. We get our hands on what we need our hands on.”

“Why do you only review capital cases?”

“Because our capabilities for punitive action are limited. We can impose either a death sentence or nothing at all. Because of this we don’t concern ourselves with lesser charges.”

Robert settled back against the wall and flexed his crossed arms. “Our rehabilitation program is not yet under development.” He ignored Dumone’s unamused glance, his eyes on Tim, dark stones in the leathery flesh of his face.

Ananberg said, “An added benefit is, we serve as a corrective for all those death-penalty biases. The majority of those sent to death row by America’s traditional courts are underprivileged minorities who can’t afford proper representation—”

“Whereas we’re an equal-opportunity exterminator,” Mitchell said.

“Do you know, Mr. Rackley, one of the overlooked benefits of legal punishment?” Tim found Rayner’s rhetorical questions to be another indication of his not-so-subtle condescension. “It removes from the victims and victims’ families the moral obligation of retaliation. In doing so it prevents society from deteriorating into feuds. But when the state defaults on its ability to inflict punishment for you, you still feel it, don’t you? The moral necessity to see justice done for your daughter? You’ll
always
feel it—believe me. The twitch of a phantom limb.”

Tim walked over, got in Rayner’s space just enough to imply aggression. Robert pushed himself up off his incline against the wall, but Dumone backed him down from across the room with the briefest flutter of his hand. Tim took note of all these dynamics and plugged them in to the dominance hierarchy he was evolving in his head. Rayner didn’t give the slightest indication of being intimidated.

Tim gestured at the others. “And you collected them through your work?”

“Yes. I conduct extensive subject analysis in the course of my research. It’s helped me determine who would be responsive to my ideas.”

“And you took an interest in me when my daughter was killed.”

“Virginia’s case caught our eye, yes,” Ananberg said.

Tim was impressed by her decision to refrain from euphemism and refer to Ginny by name. This small, knowing touch also added credibility to Rayner’s claim that everybody present had lost a family member.

“We were having a hard time finding candidates,” Rayner said. “Your particular set of skills and ethics is
remarkably
rare. And the other remotely similar candidates we were considering fell too much into the rule-follower camp, which made them unlikely to partake in a venture such as this. We started looking at candidates whose lives had been marred by some personal tragedy. Especially those who’d had loved ones killed or raped by assailants who navigated through a faulty system to find their way back onto the streets. So when Ginny’s story hit the news, we thought, here is someone who understands our pain.”

“We didn’t know, of course, that Kindell would get off
again,
” Ananberg said, “but when that happened, it pretty much sealed our decision to approach you.”

“We’d hoped to recruit you as a deputy marshal, when you still had access to your tracking resources,” Rayner confided. “We were disappointed by your resignation.”

“I never would have done anything to undermine the service,” Tim said. “I still wouldn’t.”

Robert scowled. “Even after they betrayed you?”

“Yes.” Tim turned back to Rayner. “Tell me how it started. This…idea.”

“I met Franklin when I was in Boston for a law and psychology conference about three years ago,” Rayner said. “We were on the same panel—I had lost a boy, Franklin his wife—and we had an immediate affinity for each other. We went out to a meal afterward, found ourselves a few drinks in and theorizing openly, and the idea of the Commission was hatched. The next morning, of course, we dismissed our conversation as hypothetical banter. The conference ended, and I came back to L.A. A few weeks later I had one of those nights—you know the kind of night to which I’m referring, Mr. Rackley? The kind of night when grief and vengeance take on a life of their own? They become tangible, electric.” Rayner’s eyes drifted.

“Yes.”

“And so I called Franklin who, as fate would have it, was having a night similar to mine. We revisited the idea of the Commission, again in the safety of the night, but this time it took. It seemed less frightful in the cold light of the next morning.” His eyes regained their sharp focus, and his tone became more brisk. “I had tremendous resources at hand for selecting members of the Commission. In my studies I looked for law-enforcement officers with unusually high IQs, who were sensitive to authority and policy but were also independent thinkers. Now and then someone would strike me as particularly right for the Commission. And Franklin could run background checks, contact them, bring them into our circle.” He flashed a pleased little smile. “The hesitation you’re displaying now, Mr. Rackley, affirms our opinion that we want you on board.”

“Think of the collective experience and knowledge we have assembled in this room,” Ananberg said. “All the different ways we’ve spent time with the law, learning its curves and contours, flaws and strengths.”

“What if you disagree on a verdict?”

Rayner said, “Then we’ll throw out the case and move on. Only a unanimous verdict will stand in the Commission. Unanimity is required for any policy shift as well. That way, if any of us grows uncomfortable with
anything
, we have veto power.”

“Is this the entire Commission?”

“You will be the seventh and final member,” Dumone said. “If you elect to join.”

“And how is this little enterprise funded?”

Rayner’s mustache shifted with his grin. “The books have been good to me.”

“You’ll draw a humble paycheck,” Dumone said. “And, of course, all expenses will be covered.”

“Now we’d like to clarify one point,” Ananberg said. “We do not advocate cruel and unusual punishment. The executions are to be swift and painless.”

“I don’t go in for torture,” Tim said.

Ananberg’s lipsticked mouth pulled to one side in a smirk, the first break in her icy façade. Everyone seemed comfortable with letting silence fill the study for a few moments.

Tim asked, “What’s the status of your personal cases?”

“Franklin’s wife’s killer disappeared after being acquitted,” Rayner said. “The last reports of him were from Argentina. The man who killed the Stork’s mother is currently incarcerated for a later offense. Robert and Mitchell’s sister’s murderer was later shot and killed in an unrelated incident, and Jenna’s mother’s killer was beaten to death in a gang killing over a decade ago. That’s the status of our—how did you put it?—
personal
cases.”

“And the man who killed your son?”

Bitterness passed through Rayner’s eyes, then vanished. “He’s still out there, my son’s killer. Walking the streets. Somewhere in New York—Buffalo when last I heard.”

“I bet you just can’t wait to vote him guilty.”

“I wouldn’t touch my own case, actually.” Rayner looked offended at Tim’s expression of disbelief. “This is not a vengeance service.” His face firmed with a stalwart pride common to maudlin World War II movies. “I could never be objective. However…”

“What?”

“We’re going to call upon you to be. I’ve selected Kindell’s case for the Commission. It’ll be the seventh and final one we examine in our first phase.”

Tim felt himself flush at the thought of another crack at Kindell. He hoped his longing wasn’t too clear on his face. He gestured at the others. “How about theirs?”

Rayner shook his head. “Yours is the only personal case we’re going to examine.”

“Why’d I get so lucky?”

“It’s the only case that precisely fits our profile. An L.A. crime, a lot of media heat, the trial botched due to a procedural violation.”

“L.A. is key from an operational perspective,” Dumone said. “We’re only comfortable dealing with cases in this area. Our strongest contacts are here.”

“We’ve spent a lot of time here, me and Mitch,” Robert said, “smelling the street, figuring out how to operate—operate invisibly. You know the drill. Well-placed contacts. Phone lines. Car rentals. Back routes around town.”

“You must have well-placed contacts in Detroit,” Tim said.

“We’re known there. In Hell-A nobody’s anybody until they’re somebody.”

“Once we start traveling, dealing with other court systems and police bureaus, it really opens us up,” Dumone said. “Not to mention the trail it leaves. Airline tickets, hotels.” His eyes twinkled. “We dislike trails.”

“Something tells me there’s another angle,” Tim said. “Like Ginny’s case being a carrot you can dangle in front of me. That’s why it’s the ‘seventh and final’ one.”

Rayner seemed pleased—Tim was talking his language. “Yes, of course. No need to pretend. We do need an insurance policy of sorts, to make sure you’re not doing this just for revenge. We want to ensure that you stick around, that you’re committed to our cause. We’re not here merely to serve your agenda—there’s a greater social good at stake.”