The Epigenetics Revolution (18 page)
Read The Epigenetics Revolution Online
Authors: Nessa Carey
Tags: #Science/Life Sciences/Genetics and Genomics
Figure 7.1
The mammalian egg just after it has been penetrated by a sperm, but before the two haploid (half the normal chromosome number) pronuclei have fused. Note the disparity in size between the pronucleus that came from the egg, and the one that originated from the sperm.
The mammalian egg just after it has been penetrated by a sperm, but before the two haploid (half the normal chromosome number) pronuclei have fused. Note the disparity in size between the pronucleus that came from the egg, and the one that originated from the sperm.
Many years ago Professor Gurdon used tiny micropipettes to transfer the nuclei from the body cells of toads into toad eggs. Azim Surani used a refinement of this technology to transfer pronuclei between different fertilised eggs from mice. The manipulated fertilised eggs were then implanted into female mice and allowed to develop.
In a slew of papers, mainly published between the years of 1984 and 1987, Professor Surani demonstrated that it’s essential to have a male and a female pronucleus in order to create new living mice. This is shown graphically in
Figure 7.2
.
Figure 7.2
.
Figure 7.2
A summary of the outcomes from the early work of Azim Surani. The pronucleus was removed from a mouse egg. This donor egg was then injected with two haploid pronuclei and the resulting diploid egg was implanted into a mouse surrogate mother. Live mice resulted only from the eggs which had been reconstituted with one male and one female pronucleus. Embryos from eggs reconstituted with either two male or two female pronuclei failed to develop properly and the embryos died during development.
A summary of the outcomes from the early work of Azim Surani. The pronucleus was removed from a mouse egg. This donor egg was then injected with two haploid pronuclei and the resulting diploid egg was implanted into a mouse surrogate mother. Live mice resulted only from the eggs which had been reconstituted with one male and one female pronucleus. Embryos from eggs reconstituted with either two male or two female pronuclei failed to develop properly and the embryos died during development.
To control for the effects of different DNA genomes, the researchers used inbred mouse strains. This ensured that the three types of fertilised eggs shown in the diagram were genetically identical. Yet despite being genetically identical, a series of experiments from Azim Surani and his colleagues
1
,
2
,
3
, along with other work from the laboratories of Davor Solter
4
and Bruce Cattanach
5
were conclusive. If the fertilised egg contained only two female pronuclei, or two male ones, no live mice were ever born. You needed a pronucleus of each sex.
1
,
2
,
3
, along with other work from the laboratories of Davor Solter
4
and Bruce Cattanach
5
were conclusive. If the fertilised egg contained only two female pronuclei, or two male ones, no live mice were ever born. You needed a pronucleus of each sex.
This is an absolutely remarkable finding. In all three scenarios shown in the diagram, the zygote ends up with exactly the same amount of genetic material. Each zygote has a diploid genome (two copies of every chromosome). If the only factor that was important in the creation of a new individual was the
amount
of DNA, then all three types of fertilised eggs should have developed to form new individuals.
amount
of DNA, then all three types of fertilised eggs should have developed to form new individuals.
Quantity isn’t everything
This led to a revolutionary concept – the maternal and paternal genomes may deliver the same DNA but they are not functionally equivalent. It’s not enough just to have the correct amount of the correct sequence of DNA. We have to inherit some from our mother and some from our father. Somehow, our genes ‘remember’ who they come from. They will only function properly if they come from the ‘correct’ parent. Just having the right number of copies of each gene, doesn’t fulfil the requirements for normal development and healthy life.
We know that this isn’t some strange effect that only applies to mice, because of a naturally occurring human condition. In about one in 1500 human pregnancies, for example, there is a placenta in the uterus but there is no foetus. The placenta is abnormal, covered in fluid-filled, grape-like lumps. This structure is called a hydatidiform mole, and in some Asian populations the frequency of these molar pregnancies can be as high as 1 in 200. The apparently pregnant women gain weight, often more quickly than in a normal pregnancy and they also suffer morning sickness, often to a quite extreme degree. The rapidly-growing placental structures produce abnormally high levels of a hormone which is thought to be responsible for the symptoms of nausea in pregnancy.
In countries with good healthcare infrastructure, the hydatidiform mole is normally detected at the first ultrasound scan, and then an abortion-type procedure is carried out by a medical team. If not detected, the mole will usually abort spontaneously at around four or five months post-fertilisation. Early detection of these moles is important as they can form potentially dangerous tumours if they aren’t removed.
These moles are formed if an egg which has somehow lost its nucleus is fertilised. In about 80 per cent of hydatidiform molar pregnancies, an empty egg is fertilised by a single sperm, and the haploid sperm genome is copied to create a diploid genome. In about 20 per cent of cases the empty egg is fertilised simultaneously by two sperm. In both cases the fertilised egg has the correct number of chromosomes (46), but all the DNA came from the father. Because of this, no foetus develops. Just like the experimental mice, human development requires chromosomes from both the mother and the father.
This human condition and the experiments in mice are impossible to reconcile with a model based only on the DNA code, where DNA is a naked molecule, which carries information only in its sequence of A, C, G and T base-pairs. DNA alone isn’t carrying all the necessary information for the creation of new life. Something else must be required in addition to the genetic information. Something epigenetic.
Eggs and sperm are highly specialised cells – they are at the bottom of one of Waddington’s troughs. The egg and the sperm will never be anything other than an egg and a sperm. Unless they fuse. Once they fuse, these two highly specialised cells form one cell which is so unspecialised it is totipotent and gives rise to every cell in the human body, and the placenta. This is the zygote, at the very top of Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. As this zygote divides, the cells become more and more specialised, forming all the tissues of our bodies. Some of these tissues ultimately give rise to eggs or sperm (depending on our sex, obviously) and the whole cycle is ready to start again. There’s effectively a never-ending circle in developmental biology.
The chromosomes in the pronuclei of sperm and eggs carry large numbers of epigenetic modifications. This is part of what keeps these gametes behaving as gametes, and not turning into other cell types. But these gametes can’t be passing on their epigenetic patterns, because if they did the fertilised zygote would be some sort of half-egg, half-sperm hybrid when it clearly isn’t this at all. It’s a completely different totipotent cell that will give rise to an entirely new individual. Somehow the modifications on eggs and sperm get changed to a different set of modifications, to drive the fertilised egg into a different cell state, at a different position in Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. This is part of normal development.
Re-installing the operating system
Almost immediately after the sperm has penetrated the egg, something very dramatic happens to it. Pretty much all the methylation on the male pronucleus DNA (i.e. from the sperm) gets stripped off, incredibly quickly. The same thing happens to the DNA on the female pronucleus, albeit a lot more slowly. This means that a lot of the epigenetic memory gets wiped off the genome. This is vital for putting the zygote at the top of Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. The zygote starts dividing and soon creates the blastocyst – the golf ball inside the tennis ball from
Chapter 2
. The cells in the golf ball – the inner cell mass, or ICM – are the pluripotent cells, the ones that give rise to embryonic stem cells in the laboratory.
Chapter 2
. The cells in the golf ball – the inner cell mass, or ICM – are the pluripotent cells, the ones that give rise to embryonic stem cells in the laboratory.
The cells of the ICM soon differentiate and start giving rise to the different cell types of our bodies. This happens through very tightly regulated expression of a few key genes. One specific protein, for example OCT4, switches on another set of genes, which results in a further cascade of gene expression, and so on. We have met
OCT4
before – it is the most critical of all the genes that Professor Yamanaka used to reprogram somatic cells. These cascades of gene expression are associated with epigenetic modification of the genome, changing the DNA and histone marks so that certain genes stay switched on or get switched off appropriately. Here’s the sequence of epigenetic events in very early development:
OCT4
before – it is the most critical of all the genes that Professor Yamanaka used to reprogram somatic cells. These cascades of gene expression are associated with epigenetic modification of the genome, changing the DNA and histone marks so that certain genes stay switched on or get switched off appropriately. Here’s the sequence of epigenetic events in very early development:
1. The male and female pronuclei (from the sperm and the egg respectively) are carrying epigenetic modifications;
2. The epigenetic modifications get taken off (in the immediate post-fertilisation zygote);
3. New epigenetic modifications get put on (as the cells begin to specialise).
This is a bit of a simplification. It’s certainly true that researchers can detect huge swathes of DNA demethylation during stage 2 from this list. However, it’s actually more complicated than this, particularly in respect of histone modifications. Whilst some histone modifications are being removed, others are becoming established. At the same time as the repressive DNA methylation is removed, certain histone marks which repress gene expression are also erased. Other histone modifications which increase gene expression may take their place. It’s therefore too naïve to refer to the epigenetic changes as just being about putting on or taking off epigenetic modifications. In reality, the epigenome is being reprogrammed.
Reprogramming is what John Gurdon demonstrated in his ground-breaking work when he transferred the nuclei from adult toads into toad eggs. It’s what happened when Keith Campbell and Ian Wilmut cloned Dolly the Sheep by putting the nucleus from a mammary gland cell into an egg. It’s what Yamanaka achieved when he treated somatic cells with four key genes, all of which code for proteins highly expressed naturally during this reprogramming phase.
The egg is a wonderful thing, honed through hundreds of millions of years of evolution to be extraordinarily effective at generating vast quantities of epigenetic change, across billions of base-pairs. None of the artificial means of reprogramming cells comes close to the natural process in terms of speed or efficiency. But the egg probably doesn’t quite do everything unaided. At the very least, the pattern of epigenetic modifications in sperm is one that allows the male pronucleus to be reprogrammed relatively easily. The sperm epigenome is primed to be reprogrammed
6
.
6
.
Unfortunately, these priming chromatin modifications (and many other features of the sperm nucleus), are missing if an
adult
nucleus is reprogrammed by transferring it into a fertilised egg. That’s also true when an adult nucleus is reprogrammed by treating it with the four Yamanaka factors to create iPS cells. In both these circumstances, it’s a real challenge to completely reset the epigenome of the adult nucleus. It’s just too big a task.
adult
nucleus is reprogrammed by transferring it into a fertilised egg. That’s also true when an adult nucleus is reprogrammed by treating it with the four Yamanaka factors to create iPS cells. In both these circumstances, it’s a real challenge to completely reset the epigenome of the adult nucleus. It’s just too big a task.
This is probably why so many cloned animals have abnormalities and shortened lifespans. The defects that are seen in these cloned animals are another demonstration that if early epigenetic modifications go wrong, they may stay wrong for life. The abnormal epigenetic modification patterns result in permanently inappropriate gene expression, and long-term ill-health.
All this reprogramming of the genome in normal early development changes the epigenome of the gametes and creates the new epigenome of the zygote. This ensures that the gene expression patterns of eggs and sperm are replaced by the gene expression patterns of the zygote and the subsequent developmental stages. But this reprogramming also has another effect. Cells can accumulate inappropriate or abnormal epigenetic modifications at various genes. These disrupt normal gene expression and can even contribute to disease, as we shall see later in this book. The reprogramming of the egg and the sperm prevent them from passing on from parent to offspring any inappropriate epigenetic modifications they have accumulated. Not so much wiping the slate clean, more like re-installing the operating system.
Making the switch
Other books
On Her Father's Grave (Rogue River Novella Book 1) by Elliot, Kendra
The Wayward One (The De Montforte Brothers Book 5) by Danelle Harmon
Her Own Rules/Dangerous to Know by Barbara Taylor Bradford
Don't Close Your Eyes! by R.L. Stine
The Z Infection by Burgess, Russell
The Killing Jar by RS McCoy
Demigods by Robert C Ray
Alan Dale - Death Nation's Army 01 by Dna Code Flesh
Heather Graham by Maverickand the Lady
Red Fever by Caroline Clough