Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion (59 page)
The feeling is therefore that a company like A.T.
& T.
is most likely to be first in this field.
This giant company (unknown in the air and weapons field) has already revolutionized modern warfare with the development of the junction transistor and is expected to find the final answers to absolute vehicle levitation.
This therefore is where the bulk of the sponsoring money should go.
Aviation Report
, 9 December 1955
ADDENDUM II
Electrostatic Patents
E
LECTROSTATIC
M
OTOR
(a) American patents still in force:
2,413,391 Radio Corp of America 20-6-42/31-12-46 Power Supply System
2,417,452 Raytheon Mfg.
Co.
17-1-44/18-3-47 Electrical System
2,506,472 W.B.
Smits 3-7-46Holl/ 2-5-50 Electrical Ignition Apparatus
2,545,354 G.E.C.
16-3-50/13 3-51 Generator (=Engl.
P.676,953)
2,567,373 Radio Corp of America 10-6-49/11-9-51 El’static Generator
2,577,446 Chatham Electronics 5-8-50/ 4-12-51 El’static Voltage Generator
2,578,908 US-Atomic Energy C.
26-5-47/18-12-51 El’static Voltage Generator
2,588,513 Radio Corp of America 10-6-49/11-3-52 El’static High-Voltage Generator
2,610,994 Chatham Electronics 1-9-50/16-9-52 El’static Voltage Generator
2,662,191 P.
Okey 31-7-52/8-12-53 El’static Machine
2,667,615 R.
G.
Brown 30-1-52/26-1-54 El’static Generator
2,671,177 Consolidated Eng.Corp 4-9-51/2-3-54 El’static Charging App’s.
2,701,844 H.
R.
Wasson 8-1250/8-2-55 El’static Generator of Electricity
2,702,353 US-Navy 17-7-52/15-2-55 Miniature Printed Circuit Electrostatic Generator
(b) British patents still in force:
651,153 Metr.-Vickers Electr.
Co 20-5-48/14-3-51 Voltage Transformation of Electrical Energy
651,295 Ch.
F.
Warthen Sr (U.S.A.) 6-8-48/14-3-51 Electrostatic AC Generator
731,774 “Licentia” 19-9-52 & 21-11-53Gy/15-6-55 El’static High-Voltage Generator
(c) French patents still in force:
753,363 H.
Chaumat 19-7-32/13-10-33 Moteur electrostatique utilisant l’energie cinetique d’ions gazeux
749,832 H.
Chaumat 24-1-33/29-7-33 Machine electrostatique a excitation independante
The patents on page 441 derive from P.
Jolivet (Algiers), marked “A,” and from N.
J.
Felici, E.
Gartner (Centre National des Recherches Scientifique [CRNS]), and later by R.
Morel and M.
Point (S.A.
des Machines Electrostatiques [SAMES] and of Societe d’ Appareils de Controle et d’Equipment des Moteurs [SACEM]), marked “G” (because the development was centered at the University Grenoble).
APPENDIX D
A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIMENTS MADE IN PARIS BY T.
TOWNSEND BROWN
APPENDIX E
NOTES ON THE SKYVAULT ANTIGRAVITY PROJECT
Below are reproductions of my informant “Tom’s” notes from interviews with his supervisor on two occasions (see
chapter 7
).
August 2, 1974, Interview Notes
Project was initiated by the government through Rocketdyne in the middle to late 50s.
Extremely high frequency in 1000 gigaHertz on up were employed with a voltage waveform being triangular [i.e., sawtooth shaped] (other forms were tried, but this was the best to use) at 100 kv with infinitesimal amperage—milliamps.
Lowest frequency ranged from 7.2 to 8.7 gigaHertz.
With use of waveguides, a beam of conical shape was projected upward from ground to a vehicle which rode upon it.
The vehicle had a concave bottom and the cone of the beam was wide in respect to the vehicle—the concave surface received the beam and was buoyed by it.
[Tom later acknowledged that he had misinterpreted the above propulsion scheme; see the notes from his October 2, 1974 interview with his supervisor reproduced below.]
Mathematical analysis, & other related studies, of the conical shape region proved that Einstein was correct on gravitational waves and particular and that the high frequency nullified gravitation effects.
For nullification of gravity, the frequencies do extend upward into the lower spectrum of light.
The vehicle that did carry a man was
powered
(controlled) by a transmitter located upon a mountain (no info on this transmitter).
The highest observed flight remembered (though it probably had a higher capability) was ~50,000 feet and a range of near 300 miles—over desert and attained extreme speeds.
Microwaves do exert a pressure and aluminum foil will move and disintegrate upon exposure.
Other materials may or may not be affected in the same manner—paper will not work, some kinds of wood and silks will not.
Best movement occurs if the material has a particular magnetic property (not mention as to meaning, however, he inferred paramagnetic?).
The concave portion of the vehicle had something similar to ceramic like Corning ware.
Extensive tests involving materials and wave shapes were made and data was accumulated on destruction, burning, and shock waves on those materials that responded.
The microwaves employed were able to pass through brick walls & concrete without affecting either and with non diminishing effect on the microwaves.
The estimated efficiency of the propulsion system was 60% with a much higher efficiency at this time as high probability.
Diode material for the rectifiers (and maybe Gunn diodes) were furnished by International Rectifier.
Reactions with the beam with some materials were violent and unpredictable.
Used different shapes of waveguides throughout research.
October 2, 1974, Interview Notes
I asked if the mechanical pulser had very small electrode for arcing & if it operated somewhere from 60 to 100 thousand rpm—both were answered with a “yes.”
I asked if they had temperature problems with electrodes burning—No, he said, but using platinum it was eliminated and there was very little arcing due to the ultrahigh vacuum.
They did try at first a mechanical pulser at atmospheric pressure but discarded it promptly due to bouncing and noise in its pulses.
I have had a misinterpretation.
The propulsion device was built into the spacecraft and a transmitter on the ground was used to provide directional control only to the spacecraft.
So it is not a beam rider.
The propulsion beam from the spacecraft was focused by an iris type convex lens towards the Earth and was a greenish blue light.
Letter Tom received from his supervisor’s friend.
