Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition (58 page)
Read Sacred Economics: Money, Gift, and Society in the Age of Transition Online
Authors: Charles Eisenstein
If money is in a savings account, it probably means that someone doesn’t need to use it right now. The function of a bank is supposed to be to put that money in the hands of someone who does want to use it. Only then can it be said to “exist” in economic terms, and only then does it have economic effects (e.g., stimulating production). In contrast to a saver, a borrower is someone who does want to use money right now. Therefore, any transfer of money from saver to borrower, whether under a full-reserve or fractional-reserve model, will increase the effective money supply. It will increase the amount of money that is actually being used.
I cannot help but remark on the similarity between fractional-reserve
money and the superposition of states of a quantum particle. The matter is therefore more subtle than the same money existing in many places at once, a description that still conceives it as an objectively existing thing. It is that it exists in all and none of those places at once, existing only as a possibility until brought into being by a transaction. Ten people can have $100 each in their savings accounts, based on $100 of base money. Any one of them could withdraw their $100 at any time, but until they do, that $100 cannot be said to exist in any of those savings accounts. Like in a quantum measurement, the money is virtual until brought into reality through an interaction, a transaction. You withdraw your $100 from the ATM and look! There is the cash! It was there all along, right? No. It only appeared there through the act of the withdrawal, or the act of writing a check. Is the money in your savings account “really there” or not? That is the question that bothers “real money” advocates, but ultimately it is not a useful question. Whether or not it is there, it comes into being when a transaction is made, just as an electron comes into being when it interacts with an observer. With money as with matter, existence is a relationship.
“Real money” advocates would seem to want to return us to a Cartesian age, in which existence is not a relationship but a monadic predicate. This desire is inconsistent with the revolution in human beingness that is underway today: the expansion of the discrete and separate self into a larger, connected self. Even in physics, being is no longer an objective property, at least if by “exist” we mean “to occupy a quantifiable point in space and time.” Physical location is not an objective quantity. Why, then, should we demand it of our money?
Indeed, perhaps if we are to move with the tide of the times, we should do away with base money entirely and move toward a
pure credit system where all money comes into being through a transaction and perishes in its absence. Are reserves even necessary at all? Paradoxically enough, the possibility of a full-reserve system implies that they are not necessary, since a full-reserve system is no different from a reserve-less system. In both cases, there is one kind of money, not two. Moreover, reserve-less systems on a smaller scale have been envisioned and employed—LETS and other mutual-credit system are reserve-free credit-based systems.
Could the present system work without reserves? Why couldn’t Bank A create that $1 million credit in John’s account and then debit that account by $1 million when he pays Mary, whose account in Bank B is then increased by $1 million, all without reserves? Well, it could, except that we would then face the same problem that all mutual-credit systems face: how to regulate who gets to create how much credit, and how to limit negative balances. The reserve system puts a limit on bank lending. Without it, a banker could lend unlimited amounts to his cronies and then go bankrupt, effectively divorcing money from contribution to society and debasing the value of the money of those who do contribute. Of course, other limiting mechanisms might be employed—for example, the state could determine by fiat who gets credit, or we could use some kind of formula or a social feedback system with ratings and points. To return to the quantum money metaphor, in a quantum system the range of possible quantum states made manifest though a measurement is limited. Just as the probability wave function describes the distribution of particles, we also need some social function that influences the distribution of money. In a single-slit experiment, most of the photons end up in certain small areas. In a credit system, most of the credit should go to those who will put it to good use. The “social function” I describe doesn’t dictate to whom it
goes; it merely sets the conditions so that it will be most likely to go to a certain area that represents the social consensus of good use. This function can be adjusted, just as a pinhole slit can be made larger or smaller, to “diffract” the creation of money over a larger or smaller domain.
Among such functions, the reserve system offers some important advantages. It is organic and self-regulating; it allows for risk taking; it accommodates both spontaneous grass-roots entrepreneurship and collectively decided direction of the flow of capital. Finally, a credit-based system with decaying currency embodies two cardinal principles of the new world: interdependency and impermanence.
Perhaps most importantly, a credit-based system can accommodate all of the proposals of this book without the revolutionary destruction of the existing financial infrastructure and rebuilding of a new one. Although the effects of negative-interest currency, elimination of economic rents, localization, and a social dividend are indeed revolutionary, the means to achieve them are not. Indeed, they all exist in embryonic form already. While many of us, including at times myself, desire to wipe the slate clean and begin anew, such revolutions have the exasperating tendency to reincorporate the old into the new. The all-or-nothing desire for total revolution can also be dispiriting and paralyzing, since it implies that incremental, doable changes are meaningless. Consequently, today’s self-proclaimed revolutionaries sit in their chat rooms doing nothing, cynically assuring each other that when the collapse comes, everyone else will finally see the error of their ways.
I think those cynics are going to be waiting a long time. Where they see a collapse, I see a transformational crisis in which the old is not abandoned but incorporated into something larger. The connected self does not deny the separate self of modernity but
adopts it as one of the many ways of being that comprise a larger self. The same is true for the structures of our civilization, all of which ultimately arise from, contribute to, and correspond to our sense of self. We could say, then, that the crises converging upon us today are a kind of identity crisis. The mistake of the collapsist crowd, I think, is to look to that crisis to save us, to do the work of wiping the slate clean. Our own efforts, the thinking goes, are not enough. From 2012 end-time theorists to Christian believers in Armageddon, the underlying thought-form is the same. But while the intuition that “things cannot persist the way they are” is valid, the conclusion is mistaken. It is not that the collapse will do our work for us. It is that the crisis will provoke us into doing the work we need to do. It is work we can start doing right now. As I wrote before, any efforts we make today to “raise bottom” for our collectively addicted civilization—any efforts we make to protect or reclaim social, natural, cultural, or spiritual capital—will both hasten and ameliorate the crisis. It is true that conditions are not yet ripe for the full blossoming of any of the proposals of this book. However, before blossoming can happen, the soil must be prepared, the seedlings nourished. That is the time we are in as I write these words. Soon, these seedlings will grow strong in the soil made fertile by the decay of existing institutions; then they will blossom and finally bear fruit.
1.
Seaford,
Money and the Early Greek Mind
, 248.
Alexander, Christopher.
The Nature of Order: Book One; The Phenomenon of Life
. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Structure, 2002.
Allen, William R. “Irving Fisher and the 100 Percent Reserve Proposal.”
Journal of Law and Economics
36, no. 2 (1993): 703–17.
Altekar, A. S.
State and Government in Ancient India
. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.
Aristotle.
Politics
. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. N.p.: Publishing in Motion, 2011.
Avila, Charles.
Ownership: Early Christian Teaching
. New York: Orbis Books, 1983.
Baker, Dean. “No Way Out: Roadblocks on the Way to Recovery.”
Counterpunch
, February 3, 2010.
Brown, Ellen. “Time for a New Theory of Money.”
Commondreams.org
, October 29, 2010.
———.
Web of Debt
. Tempe, AZ: Third Millennium Press, 2008.
Buiter, Willem. “Negative Interest Rates: When Are They Coming to a Central Bank Near You?”
Financial Times Online
, May 7, 2009.
———. “Overcoming the Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates with Negative Interest on Currency: Gesell’s Solution.”
Economic Journal
113, no. 490 (2003): 723–46.
Buzby, Jean C., Hodan Farah Wells, Bruce Axtman, and Jana Mickey. “Supermarket Loss Estimates for Fresh Fruit, Vegetables, Meat, Poultry, and Seafood and Their Use in the ERS Loss-Adjusted Food Availability Data.” EIB-44, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Serv., March 2009.
Caron, Kevin. “Abundance Creates Utility but Destroys Exchange Value.” February 2, 2010.
http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/abundance-creates-utility-but-destroys-exchange-value/2010/02/02
.
Champ, Bruce. “Stamp Scrip: Money People Paid to Use.” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Research Paper, April 1, 2008.
Clark, Stuart. “Absence of Sunspots Make Scientists Wonder If They’re Seeing a Calm before a Storm of Energy.”
Washington Post
, June 22, 2010.
Cohrssen, Hans L. “Wara.”
The New Republic
, August 10, 1932.
Collom, Ed. “Community Currency in the United States: The Social Environments in Which It Emerges and Thrives.”
Environment and Planning A
, 37 (2005): 1565–87.
Costanza, Robert, et al. “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.”
Nature
387 (1997): 253–60.
Coxe, Don. “Financial Heroin.”
Coxe Strategy Journal
, November 12, 2009.
Dalton, G. “Barter.”
Journal of Economic Issues
(1982), 16.1.182.
Daly, Herman. “The Economic Thought of Frederick Soddy.”
History of Political Economy
12, no. 4 (1980).
Deng, Feng. “A Comparative Study on Land Ownership between England and China.” Chongqing, China: Chongqing University, School of Economics and Business Administration, 2007.
Dodds, Walter Kennedy.
Humanity’s Footprint: Momentum, Impact, and our Global Environment
. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
Everett, Daniel L. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another Look at the Design Features of Human Language.”
Current Anthropology
46, no. 4 (2005).
Fisher, Irving.
Stamp Scrip
. New York: Adelphi, 1933.
Frank, Robert H., Thomas Gilovich, and Dennis T. Regan. “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?”
Journal of Economic Perspectives
7, no. 2 (1993): 159–71.
Gesell, Silvio.
The Natural Economic Order
. Translated by Philip Pye. Berlin: NEO-Verlag, 1906.
George, Henry. “The Single Tax: What It Is and Why We Urge It.” 1890.
Graves, Robert.
The White Goddess
. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1948.
Greco, Thomas.
The End of Money and the Future of Civilization
. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2009.
Hall, Robert, and Susan Woodward. “The Fed Needs to Make a Policy Statement.”
Vox
, April 13, 2009.
www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3444
.
Handon, Jon D., and David Yosifon. “The Situational Character: A Critical Realist Perspective on the Human Animal.”
Georgetown Law Journal
93, no. 1 (2004).
Hassett, Kevin. “U.S. Should Try Germany’s Unemployment Medicine.”
Bloomberg
, November 9, 2009.
Holden, G. R. “Mr. Keynes’ Consumption Function and the Time Preference Postulate.”
Quarterly Journal of Economics
52, no. 2 (1938): 281–96.
Hoppe, Hans-Hermann. “The Misesian Case against Keynes.” In
Dissent on Keynes: A Critical Appraisal of Keynesian Economics
, edited by Mark Skousen. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 1992.
Hudson, Michael. “Deficit Commission Follies.”
Counterpunch
, December 6, 2010.
www.counterpunch.org/hudson12062010.html
.
Hyde, Lewis.
The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property
. New York: Vintage Books, 2007.
Jacob, Jeffrey, Merlin Brinkerhoff, Emily Jovic, and Gerald Wheatley. “The Social and Cultural Capital of Community Currency: An Ithaca Hours Case Study Survey.”
International Journal of Community Currency Research
8 (2004): 42.
James, Frank. “Cure for U.S. Unemployment Could Lie in German-Style Job Sharing.”
NPR.org
, December 3, 2009.
Jarvis, Jeff. “When Innovation Yields Efficiency.”
Buzz Machine
, June 12, 2009.
www.buzzmachine.com/2009/06/12/when-innovation-yields-efficiency/
.
Jolowicz, H. F., and Barry Nicholas.
Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law
. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 1972.
Keen, Steven. “The Roving Cavaliers of Credit.”
Debtwatch
, January 31, 2009.
Keister, Todd, and James McAndrews. “Why Are Banks Holding So Many Excess Reserves?” Federal Bank of New York Staff Report no. 380, July 2009.
Kennedy, Margit.
Interest and Inflation-Free Money
. N.p.: Seva International, 1995.
Keynes, John Maynard. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest.”
Economic Journal
47, no. 186 (1937): 241–52.
———.
Economic Consequences of the Peace
. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Howe, 1920.
———.
The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Howe, 1936.
King, F. H.
Farmers of Forty Centuries: Or, Permanent Agriculture in China, Korea, and Japan
. New York: Dover, 2004.
Koenig, Evan, and Jim Dolmas. “Monetary Policy in a Zero-Interest Economy.”
Southwest Economy
, issue 4, July/August 2003. The Dallas Federal Reserve.
Kropotkin, Peter.
The Conquest of Bread
. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1906.
Kuhnen, Frithjof.
Man and Land: An Introduction into the Problems of Agrarian Structure and Agrarian Reform
. Saarbrücken: Deutsche Welthungerhilfe, 1982.
LaSalle, Tim, Paul Hepperly, and Amadou Diop.
The Organic Green Revolution
. Kutztown, PA: Rodale Institute, 2008.
Lee, C. J., Hsien-chan Ho, Shing-Mei Chen, Ya-huei Yang, Soon-joy Chang, and Hui-lin Wu.
The Development of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Republic of China
. Taipei, Taiwan: Chung-Hua Institute of Economic Research, 1995.
Lee, Richard.
The Dobe !Kung
. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1984.
Laidlaw, James. “A Free Gift Makes No Friends.” In
The Question of the Gift: Essays across Disciplines
, edited by Mark Olstein. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Lietaer, Bernard.
The Future of Money
. Post Falls, ID: Century, 2002.
Marx, Karl.
Grundrisse
. New York: Penguin Classics, 1993.
Mauss, Marcel.
The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies
. Translated by W. D. Halls. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.
Mankiw, N. Gregory. “It May Be Time for the Fed to Go Negative.”
New York Times
, April 18, 2009.
Mumford, Lewis.
Technics and Civilization
. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1934.
Nemat-Nejat, Karen Rhea.
Daily Life in Ancient Mesopotamia
. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988.
Pakenham, Thomas.
The Scramble for Africa
. London: Abacus, 1991.
Paine, Thomas.
Agrarian Justice
. 1797.
Perkins, John.
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
. New York: Penguin, 2005.
Piff, P. K., M. W. Kraus, B. H. Cheng, and D. Keltner. “Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
, July 12, 2010. doi:10.1037/a0020092.
Reasons, Eric. “Innovative Deflation.” July 5, 2009.
http://blog.ericreasons.com/2009/07/innovative-deflation.html
.
Rösl, Gerhard. “Regional Currencies in Germany: Local Competition for the Euro?” Deutsche Bundesbank Series 1: Economic Studies, no. 43, 2006.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques.
A Dissertation on the Origin of Inequality among Men
. Translated by G. D. H. Cole. 1754.
Sahlins, Marshall.
Stone Age Economics
. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Sale, Kirkpatrick.
Rebels against the Future
. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
Seaford, Richard.
Money and the Early Greek Mind
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Senior, N. W.
Outline of the Science of Political Economy
. 1836.
Stodder, James. “Reciprocal Exchange Networks: Implications for Macroeconomic Stability.” 2005.
http://www.lietaer.com/images/Stodder_Reciprocal_Exchange.pdf
.
Temple, Robert.
The Genius of China: 3,000 Years of Science, Discovery, and Invention
. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions, 1998.
Twist, Lynn, with Teresa Barker.
The Soul of Money
. New York: Norton, 2003.
Vallely, Paul. “How Islamic Inventors Changed the World.”
The Independent
, March 11, 2006.
Warner, Judith. “The Charitable-Giving Divide.”
New York Times Magazine
, August 20, 2010.
White, Martha C. “America’s New Debtor Prison: Jail Time Given to Those Who Owe.”
Wallet Pop
, July 15, 2010.
www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/07/15/americas-new-debtor-prison-jail-time-being-given-to-those-who/
.
Wüthrich, W. “Alternatives to Globalization: Cooperative Principle and Complementary Currency.” Translated by Philip Beard.
Current Issues (Zeit-Fragen)
, August 9, 2004.
http://www.reinventingmoney.com/documents/BeardWIR.pdf
.
Xu, Cho-yun.
Ancient China in Transition: An Analysis of Social Mobility, 722–222 B.C
. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1965.
Yong, Ed. “Fertility Rates Climb Back Up in the Most Developed Countries.” August 5, 2009.
http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/08/fertility_rates_climb_back_up_in_the_most_developed_countrie.php
.
Zarlenga, Stephen.
The Lost Science of Money
. Valatie, NY: American Monetary Institute, 2002.