Authors: Randa Abdel-Fattah
Valopolous sat down and drummed his fingers on the table. âHave you called Constable Thompson?'
âYes, he'll be here shortly. Did you notice that their claims officer is here?'
âYes,' Valopolous said. âShe doesn't look too pleased.'
âThat's because Marks doesn't agree with her defence strategy. He wanted to settle upfront but the insurer wants to fight this all the way.'
âWhy on earth would he want to cave so soon?'
âThe evidence against them is too strong. He wanted to cut his losses and get on with the business.'
I coughed, reminding them I was there.
âOh yes,' Casey said, turning to me. âSo what's this important news you need to tell me?'
I took a deep breath. âThe WorkSafe minute meetings are fake.'
Casey frowned. âExcuse me?'
âThey weren't written on the dates they say they were.'
âWhat are you talking about?' Valopolous said tersely.
âI called the manufacturer and gave them the details of the barcode at the back of the original notebook. They said that that line of notebook wasn't manufactured till November 2008. So those notes must have been written recently.'
Valopolous's face turned red. âWhat the hell is going on here, Casey?' he asked. âIs this boy a spy for the defendant? Do you normally have people on your team who go to great lengths to dismantle your clients' cases? This is an outrage!'
I couldn't believe what I was hearing. âAre you listening to what I said? Those notes are a fake. This case is based on lies.'
âNoah!' Casey yelled. âI thought I'd already spoken to you about your ridiculous conspiracy theories.'
âBut this isn't a theory! I just proved that this evidence is fake.'
Valopolous stood up and took a step towards me. âWe've just mounted our entire case on evidence offered to us by the defendant. Those notes weren't produced by Bernie or anybody connected with his legal team. They were served by the defendant and we are perfectly entitled to rely on them. That you questioned their authenticity and felt the urge to disprove them is not only outrageous but unconscionable. Your effort should be expended in supporting your client's case, not destroying it. I've heard enough. You keep your mouth shut about this and let me do my job.'
He walked out of the room, slamming the door behind him. Casey turned to me, her eyes narrow slits. âDidn't I warn you?'
âDo you people not care about justice? Bernie is fabricating this entire case. He's playing you. Don't you even care?'
âI care about winning.'
âRodney Marks is in on this too.' I instantly regretted my words.
âHave you gone completely mad? What evidence have you got?'
I couldn't possibly tell her about the text messages. I wanted to throw a chair through the wall. It was so unfair. I knew the truth but couldn't prove it.
âEr . . . nothing . . . I didn't mean that . . .'
âValopolous is going to go crazy,' Casey said wearily.
âSo you're going to rely on those minutes? Even though you know they're fake?'
âBut Valopolous . . .' she started.
For a split second I saw her waver. Her confidence seemed to crumple just for the briefest moment. And then it was back.
âJust do as you're told. I don't want to hear another word about those notes. Got it?'
I didn't answer her. I returned to court trying hard to control my anger.
Valopolous gave me a filthy look. I ignored him and sunk down into the chair behind the bar table.
Constable Thompson was tall and lanky, with auburn hair and a trimmed moustache. He sat down at the witness stand, his police cap in his hand.
Valopolous began. âWould you please state your name and occupation for the record?'
âDominic Thompson, constable with the Chatsbury police unit.'
âPermission to tender Exhibit 3: police report dated 2 July 2008?'
âGranted,' Judge Monahan said.
The court clerk took the exhibit from Valopolous and handed it to the detective.
âIs this the police report you completed?'
âYes it is.'
âWould you please explain what happened on the evening of 2 July 2008?'
âIt was approximately five thirty when I finished with a stationary RBT unitâ'
âSorry to interrupt, but could you please clarify what RBT is?'
âRandom Breath Testing. I'd set up a stationary unit on a section of Chucks Road. I was about to head back to the station when I was radioed about a homicide at Paisley Road, Chatsbury.'
âHow were the police notified about the body?'
âA call to 000 from a Tamara Tucci. She worked in an establishment called Chickin' Lickin', which was positioned two shops from Jenkins Storage World.'
âWhat happened next?'
âI radioed for back-up and immediately attended the crime scene. When I arrived, I noticed a small group of people in the car park.'
âWere there any other police present upon your arrival?'
âMy back-up arrived within five minutes of my arrival at the crime scene.'
âWhat did you do when you arrived?'
âI approached the body.'
âWhere was it?'
âIt was in the corner of the car park, between a garbage bin and a vehicle, which we later learned was the deceased's vehicle. I felt for a pulse and determined that the victim was dead.'
âCan you please describe how you found her?'
âShe was lying on her stomach, her head resting on a left angle. Her skull had been bashed in. Her brain was visible.'
âWere the deceased's personal belongings on her person?'
âNo. The victim's handbag was thrown approximately two metres from her body. Her wallet was in the bag. A set of keys, which we later established were the victim's, was found near the rear left tyre of her vehicle. She was missing a shoe, which was never recovered.'
âCan you explain why she was missing a shoe?'
âUnfortunately, no.'
âVery well. After checking for the victim's pulse, what did you do next?'
âI surveyed the area to determine if there was any security surveillance equipment. There was none.'
âIn your experience as a member of the New South Wales police force, is it your opinion that security surveillance equipment, such as video cameras, motion-sensor cameras and so on, prevent crime?'
âObjection!' Wallace called. âLeading.'
âOverruled.'
âBut, Your Honour!' Wallace pressed.
âOverruled. The witness may answer the question.'
I noticed Casey smile to herself.
âYes, they most certainly do have a deterrent effect. It goes without saying that criminals are less likely to commit crime if they know they may be identified.'
âDid you find a quantity of cash on the deceased's person or in the vicinity of her body?'
âNo.'
âThank you. No more questions.'
Judge Monahan looked over at the defence bar table. âMr Wallace?'
âConstable Thompson,' Wallace said as he approached the lectern, âyou said that video cameras have a deterrent effect. That, and I quote, “
criminals are less likely to commit crime if they know they may be identified.”
Correct?'
âYes.'
âBut couldn't a criminal who ascertains the existence of a video camera simply smash the camera and then proceed to commit the crime?'
âSure, that can happen. But that depends on the positioning of the camera and whether it is within the person's reach. Cameras can be installed up high. It also depends onâ'
âThere's no need to elaborate.'
Valopolous stood up. âYour Honour, the witness has not finished answering. If counsel asks a question, he should be prepared to listen to the answer, even if he doesn't like it.'
âI agree,' Judge Monahan said. âThe witness may continue. And in future, Mr Wallace, please refrain from cutting off witnesses simply because their answers were not foreseen by you.'
âAs I was saying,' Constable Thompson continued, âwhether security equipment is damaged can also depend on the circumstances in which a crime is committed. In the case of calculated, well thought out crimes, damaging such equipment might be part of the execution of the crime. But for crimes committed by less professional people, for want of a better word, who perhaps carry out their crimes in a more frenzied, improvised manner, then, in my opinion, I do not consider it a given that such equipment would be damaged.'
Wallace couldn't wait for the policeman to finish. âNo further questions, Your Honour,' he said quickly.
âThank you, Constable,' Judge Monahan said. âYou may step down. Do you have any more witnesses, Mr Valopolous?'
âNo, Your Honour. The plaintiff rests.'
âVery well. Court will resume at ten tomorrow morning and we will start with Mr Wallace's first witness.'
Tomorrow would be a big day. Rodney Marks, Claudia Hognio and Harold Webb were due to take the stand.
I could rely on Claudia and Harold to try to damage Bernie's case. But Rodney's evidence would be one big joke. I wondered if he would be able to pull it off. Could he really pretend to be acting in his company's best interests while in fact trying to bring his own case down?
Back at the office, Jacinta was outraged when I told her how Valopolous and Casey had reacted to my discovery of the fake meeting minutes. If Valopolous and Casey refused to question the case after that discovery, I had no hope of getting them to change their mind about Bernie. I was just hoping that Webb would be a good witness so that if Bernie ended up winning, he'd get much less. As for Claudia, I guessed she would be giving evidence of Bernie's relationship with Annie and that Maureen was on the verge of breaking up with him. No Maureen, no continuing money supply. So he couldn't turn around and say he was missing out when she would have left him anyway.
But Bernie had denied being involved in a romantic relationship and said that the affair had ended before Maureen's death. It was going to be Claudia's word against Bernie's.
Â
Rodney Marks looked so nervous that I almost felt sorry for him. He wiped his sweaty forehead with a crumpled tissue and shifted in the witness box. The funny thing was that he was still being examined by his own barrister. Valopolous's cross-examination hadn't even started.
âMr Marks, could you please explain to the court your role at Jenkins Storage World?'
âI'm the franchise owner. I have three stores: Blacktown, Chatsbury and Surry Hills. I'm the supervising manager at all the stores.'
âWhere are you based?'
âI rotate between stores.'
âAnd which store were you working at on 2 July 2008?'
âI was at the Chatsbury store.'
âWhat time did you arrive at the store?'
âI arrived just after noon.'
âWho was working on the day?'
âHarold Webb and Maureen White.'
âDid you ask Ms White to transport the day's takings to your Surry Hills store?'
âYes, I did.'
âAt what time did you make the request?'
âOh, about quarter to five. Just before we closed.'
âWhat time does the shop close?'
âAt five.'
âWhy did you entrust this task to Ms White and not say to Mr Webb?'
âI needed Mr Webb to complete a stocktake. He'd been doing it for the past couple of days and for the sake of continuity I wanted him to stick to that job.'
âMr Marks, did you convene WorkSafe meetings on
21 May 2008 and 18 June 2008?'
âYes, that sounds about right.'
âWho attended on 21 May 2008?'
âHarold Webb, Maureen White and myself.'
âHow many staff are employed in the Chatsbury store?'
âWe have another three part-timers who rotate shifts. They're uni students.'
âWhy didn't they attend the meeting?'