Lies My Teacher Told Me (10 page)

Columbus's own writings reflect this increasing racism. When Columbus was selling Queen
Isabella on the wonders of the Americas, the Indians were “well built” and “of quick
intelligence.” “They have very good customs,” he wrote, “and the king maintains a very
marvelous state, of a style so orderly that it is a pleasure to see it, and they have good
memories and they wish to see everything and ask what it is and for what it is used.”
Later, when Columbus was justifying his wars and his enslavement of the Indians, they
became “cruel” and “stupid,” “a people warlike and numerous, whose customs and religion
are very different from ours.”

It is always useful to think badly about people one has exploited or plans to exploit.
Modifying one's opinions to bring them into line with one's actions or planned actions is
the most common outcome of the process known as “cognitive dissonance,” according to the
social psychologist Leon Festinger. No one likes to think of himself or herself as a bad
person. To treat badly another person whom we consider a reasonable human being creates a
tension between act and attitude that demands resolution. We cannot erase what we have
done, and to alter our future behavior may not be in our interest. To change our atti
tude is easier, Columbus gives us the first recorded example of cognitive dissonance in the Americas, for
although the Indians may have changed from hospirable to angry, they could hardly have
evolved from intelligent to stupid so quickly. The change had to be in Columbus.

The Americas affected more than the mind. African and Eurasian stomachs were also
affected. Almost half of all major crops now grown throughout the world originally came
from the Americas. According to Alfred Crosby, adding corn to African diets caused the
population to grow, which helped fuel the African slave trade to the Americas. Adding
potatoes to European diets caused the population to explode in the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries, which in turn helped fuel the European emigration to the Americas
and Australia. Crops from America also played a key role in the ascendancy of Britain,
Germany, and, finally, Russia; the rise of these northern nations shifted the power base
of Europe away from the Mediterranean.

Shortly after ships from Columbus's second voyage returned to Europe, syphilis began to
plague Spain and Italy. There is likely a causal connection. On the other hand, more than
two hundred drugs derive from plants whose pharmacological uses were discovered by
American Indians.

Economically, exploiting the Americas transformed Europe, enriching first Spain, then,
through trade and piracy, other nations. Columbus's gold finds on Haiti were soon dwarfed
by discoveries of gold and silver in Mexico and the Andes, European religious and
political leaders quickly amassed so much gold that they applied gold leaf to the ceilings
of their churches and palaces, erected golden statues in the corners, and strung vines of
golden grapes between them. Marx and Engels held that this wealth “gave to commerce, to
navigation, to industry an impulse never before known.” Some writers credit it with the
rise of capitalism and eventually the industrial revolution. Capitalism was probably
already underway, but at the least, American riches played a major role in the transforma
tion. Gold and silver from America replaced land as the basis for wealth and status,
increasing the power of the new merchant class that would soon dominate the world. Where Muslim nations had once rivaled Europe, the new wealth undermined Islamic power.
American gold and silver fueled a 400 percent inflation that eroded the economies of
most non-European countries and helped Europe to develop a global market system, Africa
suffered: the trans-Saharan trade collapsed, because the Americas supplied more gold and
silver than the Gold Coast ever could. African traders now had only one commodity that
Europe wanted: slaves. In anthropologist Jack Weatherford's words, “Africans thus became
victims ofthe discovery ofAmerica as surely as did the American Indians.”

Astoimdingly, not one textbook I surveyed describes these geopolitical implications of
Columbia's encounter with the Americas. Three of the twelve books credit Indians with
having developed important crops. Otherwise, the west-to-east flow of ideas and wealth
goes unnoticed. Eurocentrism blinds textbook authors to contributions to Europe, whether from Arab astronomers, African navigators, or American Indian social
structure. By accepting this limited viewpoint, our history textbooks never invite us to
think about what happened to reduce mainland Indian societies, whose wealth and cities
awed the Spanish, to the impoverished peasantry they are today. They also rob us of the
chance to appreciate how important America has been in the formation of the modern world.

This theft impoverishes us, keeps us ignorant of what has caused the world to develop as it has. Clearly our textbooks
are not about teaching history. Their enterprise is Building Character, They therefore
treat Columbus as an origin myth: He was good and so are we.8i In 1989 President Bush invoked Columbus as a role model for the nation: “Christopher
Columbus not only opened the door to a New World, but also set an example for us all by
showing what monumental feats can be accomplished through perseverance and faith.”84 The columnist Jeffrey Hart recently went even further: “To denigrate Columbus is to
denigrate what is worthy in human history and in us all.”85 Textbook authors who are pushing Columbus to build character obviously have no interest in
mentioning what he did with the Americas once he reached them even though that's half of
the story, and perhaps the more important half.

I am not proposing the breast-beating alternative: that Columbus was bad and so are we. On
the contrary, textbooks should show that neither morality nor immorality can simply be
conferred upon us by history. Merely being part of the United States, without regard to
our own acts and ideas, does not make us moral or immoral beings. History is more
complicated than that.

Again we must pause to consider: who are “we”? Columbus is not a hero in Mexico, even
though Mexico is much more Spanish in culture than the United States and might be expected
to take pride in this hero of Spanish history. Why not? Because Mexico is also much more
Indian than the United States, and Mexicans perceive Columbus as white and European. “No
sensible Indian person,” wrote George P. Horse Capture, “can celebrate the arrival of
Columbus.”" Cherishing Columbus is a characteristic of white history, not American
history,

Columbus's conquest of Haiti can be seen as an amazing feat of courage and imagination by
the first of many brave empire builders. It can also be understood as a bloody atrocity that left a legacy of genocide and slavery that endures in some
degree to this day. Both views of Columbus are valid; indeed, Columbus's importance in
history owes precisely to his being both a heroic navigator and a great plunderer. If Columbus were only the former, he would merely rival Leif Erikson.
Columbus's actions exemplify both meanings of the word exploita remarkable deed and also a taking advantage of. The worshipful biographical vignettes of
Columbus in our textbooks serve to indoctrinate students into a mindless endorsement of
colonialism that is strikingly inappropriate in today's postcolonia) era. In the words of
the historian Michael Wallace, the Columbus myth “allows us to accept the contemporary
division of the world into developed and underdeveloped spheres as natural and given,
rather than a historical product issuing from a process that began with Columbus's first
voyage,”

We understand Columbus and all European explorers and settlers more clearly if we treat
1492 as a meeting of three cultures (Africa was soon involved), rathet than a discovery by
one. The term New World is itself part of the problem, for people had lived in the Americas for thousands of
years. The Americas were new only to Europeans. The word discover is another part of the problem, for how can one person discover what another already knows
and owns? Our textbooks are struggling with this issue, trying to move beyond colonialized
history and Eurocentric language, “If Columbus had not discovered the New World,” states Land ofPromise, “others soon would have.” Three sentences later, the authors try to take back the word;
“As is often pointed out, Columbus did not really 'discover' America. When he arrived on
this side of the Atlantic there were perhaps 20 or more million people already here,” Taking back words is ineffectual, however. Promise's whole approach is to portray whites discovering nonwhites tather than a mutual,
multicultural encounter. The point isn't idle. Words are importantthey can influence, and
in some cases rationalize, policy. In 1823 Chief Justice John Marshall of the United
States Supreme Court decreed that Cherokees had certain rights to their land in Georgia by
dint of their “occupancy” but that whites had superior rights owing to their “dis
covery.” How Indians managed to occupy Georgia without having previously discovered it
Marshall neglected to explain.ae The process of exploration has itself typically been multiracial and multicultural.
William Erasmus, a Canadian Indian, pointed out, “Explorers you call great men were
helpless. They were like lost children, and it was our people who took care of them.”8“ African pilots helped Prince Henry's ship captains learn their way down the coast of
Africa.”0 On Christmas Day 1492, Columbus needed help. The Santa. Maria ran aground off Haiti. Columbus sent for help to the nearest Arawak town, and “all the
people of the town” responded, “with very big and many canoes.” “They cleared the decks in
a very short rime,” Columbus continued, and the chief “caused all our goods to be placed
together near the palace, until some houses that he gave us where all might be put and
guarded had been emptied.”91 On his final voyage Columbus shipwrecked on Jamaica, and the Arawaks there kept him and
his crew of more than a hundred alive for a whole year until Spaniards from Haiti rescued
them.

So it has continued. Native Americans cured Cartier's men of scurvy near Montreal in 1535.
They repaired Francis Drake's Golden Hind in California so he could complete his round-the-world voyage in 1579, Lewis and Clark's
expedition to the Pacific Northwest was made possible by tribe after tribe of American
Indians, with help from two Shoshone guides, Sacagawea and Toby, who served as
interpreters. When Admiral Peary discovered the North Pole, the first person there was
probably neither the European American Peary nor the African American Matthew Henson, his
assistant, but their four Inuit guides, men and women on whom the entire expedition relied. Our histories fail to mention such assistance. They portray proud Western conquerors
bestriding the world like the Colossus at Rhodes.

So long as our textbooks hide from us the roles that people of color have played in
exploration, from at least 6000 B.C. to the twentieth century, they encourage us to look
to Europe and its extensions as the seat of all knowledge and intelligence. So long as our
textbooks simply celebrate Columbus, rather than teach both sides of his exploit, they
encourage us to identify with white Western exploitation rather than study it.

The passage in the left-hand column of the opposing page is one of the many legends that
hang about Columbus like barnacles“myths, all without substance.”" The passage in the
right-hand column is part of a contemporaneous account of an Arawak cacique (leadet) who had fled from Haiti to Cuba,

A man riding a mule moved slowly down a dusty road in Spain. He wore an old and shabby
cloak over his shoulders. Though his face seemed young, his red hair was already turning
white. It was early in the year 1492 and Christopher Columbus was leaving Spain.

Twice the Spanish king and queen had refused his request for ships. He had wasted five
years of his life trying to get their approval. Now he was going to France. Perhaps the
French king would give him the ships he needed.

Columbus heard a clattering sound. He turned and looked up the road. A horse and rider
came racing toward him. The rider handed him a message, and Columbus turned his mule
around. The message was from the Spanish king and queen, ordering him to return. Columbus
would get his ships.

Learning that Spaniards were coming, one day [the cacique] gathered all his people together to remind them of the persecutions which the Spanish had
inflicted on the people of Hispaniola:

“Do you know why they persecute us?”

They replied: “They do it because they are cruel and bad.”

“1 will tell you why they do it,” the cacique stated, “and it is this because they have a lord whom they love very much, and I will show
him to you.”

He held up a small basket made from palms full of gold, and he said, “Here is their lord, whom rhey serve and adore ... To have this lord,
they make us suffer, for him they persecute us, for him they have killed our parents,
brothers, all our people . . . Let us not hide this lord from the Christians in any
place, for even if we should hide it in our intestines, they would get it out of us;
therefore let us throw it in this river, under the water, and they will not know where it is.” Whereupon
they threw the gold into the river.

The reader will have already guessed chat [he passage on the left comes from an American
history textbook, in this case American Adventures. Since the incident probably never happened, including it in a textbook is hard to defend.
One way to understand its inclusion is by examining what it does in the narrative. The
incident is melodramatic. It creates a mild air of suspense, even though we can be sure,
of" course, that everything will turn out all right in the end. Surely the passage
encourages identification with Columbus's enterprise, makes Columbus the underdogriding a
mule, shabby of cloakand places us on his side.

The passage on the right was recorded by Las Casas, who apparently learned it from Arawaks
on Cuba. Unlike the mule story, the cacique's story teaches important facts: that the Spanish sought gold, that they killed Indians,
that Indians fled and resisted, (Indeed, after futile attempts at armed resistance on
Cuba, this cacique fled “into the brambles.” Weeks later, when the Spanish captured him, they burned him
alive.) Nonetheless, no history textbook includes the cacique's story. Doing so might enable us to identify with the Indians' side. By avoiding the names
and stories of individual Arawaks and omitting their points of view, authors “otherize”
the Indians. Readers need not concern themselves with the Indians' ghastly fate, for
Indians never appear as recognizable human beings. Textbooks themselves, it seems,
practice cognitive dissonance.