George Orwell: A Life in Letters (87 page)

Yes, do come & see me. I hope & trust by the beginning of June I may be a bit better, at any rate less feverish. I am glad
1984
has done so well before publication. The
World Review
published a most stupid extract, abridged in such a way as to make nonsense of it.
²
I wouldn’t have let Moore arrange this if I’d known they meant to hack it about. However I suppose it’s advertisement. That
Evening Standard
man, Mr. Curran, came to interview me, & had arranged to come again, but I’m thinking of putting him off, because he tired me so last time, arguing about politics. Please give everyone my love.

Yours

George

[XX, 3626, pp. 116–17; handwritten]

1
.
Dr Margaret Kirkman, one of the two resident physicians at Cranham.

2
.
‘A Look into the Future: 1984 and
Newspeak
’, an insensitive abridgement of the Appendix to
Nineteen Eighty-Four
,
World Review
, May 1949.

To David Astor*

20 May 1949

Cranham Lodge
¹

Cranham

Gloucester

Dear David,

Thanks so much for your letter. Do come on Sunday the 29th. I’ll look forward to seeing you both. If you can, let me know beforehand time of arrival, so that I can arrange for the car. Better have lunch here, if you arrive in time (it’s quite eatable.)

I have been absolutely ghastly. I am getting a second opinion, a London specialist, supposed to be very good. Of course they can’t actually do anything but I don’t want to feel I’m letting my case go by default, also a specialist called in for one consultation might be willing to give an expert opinion on whether I’m likely to stay alive, the thing most doctors will only hum & haw about.

I’m arranging for Richard to come & stay near here, near Stroud. I suppose it will take weeks to fix up, but it’s quite a good arrangement, the people he is going to stay with have 2 children, & he can go to kindergarten with them & come over & see me in the afternoons sometimes.

Yours

George

[XX, 3628, p. 11
8; handwritten]

1
.
Orwell was writing on headed notepaper that referred to the sanatorium as Cranham Lodge.

To Jacintha Buddicom*

22 May 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Jacintha,

Thanks so much for your letter, I’d have written before, but I’ve been most horribly ill & am not very grand now. I can’t write much of a letter because it tires me to sit up. Thanks awfully for the offer, but I am generally pretty well supplied with books & things. It looks as if I am going to be in bed for months yet. I have sent for my little boy to come & stay with friends near by. I think he’ll like it, & as he is now 5 he can perhaps start going to day school. I hope to see you when I am in Town if I ever am.

Yours

Eric

[XX, 3631, pp. 119–20; handwritten]

This is the last of Orwell’s letters to Jacintha Buddicom to survive. She replied on 2 June, and he wrote again on the 8th. Both letters have been lost, but she describes Orwell’s letter in
Eric & Us
:
‘My diary records: “Letter from Eric about Nothing Ever Dies.” As I remember . . . it defined his faith in some sort of after-life. Not necessarily, or even probably, a conventional Heaven-or-Hell, but the firm belief that “nothing ever dies”, and that we must go on
somewhere
. And it ended with our old ending,
Farewell and Hail
. He probably wrote it because I had told him that my mother was ill: though I had not stressed this unduly, since he was in such poor health himself’ (p. 157).

To Sonia Brownell*

24 May 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Sonia,

I was so very sorry to put you off, but at the time I was in a ghastly state. Now I seem to be somewhat better. I do hope you’ll come & see me soon. Any day would suit me except the day you think Cyril
[Connolly*] might be coming, on the 29th, when I think someone else is coming. But any way when & if you can come let me know in advance because of ordering a car.

I’ve just had what is called a ‘second opinion’, incidentally the doctor who attended D. H. Lawrence in his last illness.
¹
He says I’m not so bad & have a good chance of surviving, but it means keeping quiet & doing no work for a long time, possibly a year or more. I don’t mind very much if I could then get well enough to do say another 5 years° work. Richard is coming down soon to stay near here. He will start going to kindergarten school in the mornings, & can sometimes come over & see me in the afternoons.

Please give everyone my love. By the way I cut the enclosed out of the
N. Y. Times
. If you see Stephen [Spender*] tell him to get another photo taken, for the honour of English letters. Looking forward to seeing you.

With love

George

[XX, 3633, p. 120; handwritten]

1
.
Dr Andrew Morland.

To Sir Richard Rees*

1 June 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Richard,

Thanks so much for your letter. Avril & R[ichard] arrived on Saturday & I think he’s settling in all right. I hope to see him once or twice this week. He seemed to me to have grown (his weight is now 3st 5lb.) & to be extremely fit.
¹
I think Avril returns to Jura on today’s boat, but I am not certain.

I have been a good bit better this last week, & after seeing my last plate they decided I am not so bad as they thought. Dr. Morland said the same, but he said I shall have to keep still for a long time, possibly as long as a year (I trust it won’t be so long as that) & not attempt to work till I am definitely better. Another doctor
²
whom David Astor brought along, although a psychologist, said much the same as the others.

I enclose a copy of that article I wanted you to read.
³
The magazine itself seemed quite unprocurable, but someone managed to get it typed out. Actually some of what I said in it I also said appropos
°
of Gandhi. I’ve just read the 4th vol. of Osbert Sitwell’s memoirs—not so good as some of the others, I think. I know nothing about Goethe, nor indeed about any German writer. I’m trying to read Henry James’s
The Spoils of Poynton
, but it bores me unbearably. Also read a short book by Rex Warner
Why was I killed?—
very silly, I thought.

So looking forward to seeing you.

Yours

G

[XX, 3638, pp. 124–5; handwritten]

1
.
Richard stayed at Whiteway (see letter to Sir Richard Rees of
17.4.49
, n. 2). In
Remembering Orwell
, Richard Blair recalls: ‘When I saw my father at Cranham I used to say, “Where does it hurt, Daddy?” because I couldn’t understand why he said it didn’t hurt, but he was in bed. I couldn’t relate to that at all’ (p. 203).

2
.
Unidentified.

3
.
‘Lear, Tolstoy and the Fool’,
Polemic
, March 1947 (XIX, 3181, pp. 54–67).

To Anthony Powell*

6 June 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Tony,

Thanks ever so for sending me the ‘Aubrey’ book.
¹
I’m so glad you
did
put in my favourite Mrs Overall after all, also the story about Sir W. Raleigh & his son. I was so sorry about Hugh Kingsmill.
²
If they are trying to get a pension for his widow, if my signature would be useful in any way, of course include me. I’m a good deal better, & trust this will continue. I had a specialist from London, who said much the same as the people here, ie. that if I get round
this
corner I could be good for quite a few years, but that I have got to keep quiet & not try to work for a long time, possibly as long as a year or two years—I trust it won’t be as long as that. It’s a great bore, but worth while if it means I can work again later. Richard is staying nearby for the summer, & comes over & sees me once or twice a week. Please remember me to everybody. I hope you & Malcolm
[Muggeridge] will come & see me some time—but of course don’t put yourselves out. I know what a tiresome journey it must be.

Yours

George

P.S. I’m reading Dante! (with a crib of course.)

[XX, 3641, p. 126; handwritten]

1
.
Brief Lives and Other Selected Writings of John Aubrey
, edited by Anthony Powell (1949).

2
.
Hugh Kingsmill (= Hugh Kingsmill Lunn, 1889–1949), critic, editor and anthologist. In his
Progress of a Biographer
(1949), Kingsmill wrote that
Animal Farm
‘revealed the poetry, humour and tenderness’ of Orwell.

To William Phillips

8 June 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Mr Phillips,
¹

I received your letter of the 2nd today. I need hardly tell you that I am delighted as well as very much astonished at your picking me out for the
Partisan Review
Award. It is the kind of honour I am quite unused to. Perhaps you will convey my thanks to the rest of the Advisory Board. I will not tell anyone about it until you make the announcement.

I will send you something when I can, but I have done no work since December & may not be able to work for a long time to come. The doctors tell me the best chance of recovery is to lie in bed & do nothing, possibly for as long as another year—I hope it won’t be as long as that, of course.

With very many thanks again, & best wishes to everybody.

Yours sincerely

Geo. Orwell

[XX, 3644, p. 130; handwritten]

1
.
Co-editor with Philip Rahv* of
Partisan Review
.

To Julian Symons*

16 June 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Julian,

I think it was you who reviewed
1984
in the
T.L.S
.
¹
I must thank you for such a brilliant as well as generous review. I don’t think you could have brought out the sense of the book better in so short a space. You are of course right about the vulgarity of the ‘Room 101’ business. I was aware of this while writing it, but I didn’t know another way of getting somewhere near the effect I wanted.

I have been horribly ill since last seeing you, but a lot better in the last few weeks, & I hope perhaps now I have turned the corner. The various doctors I have seen are all quite encouraging but say I must remain quiet & not work for a long time, possibly as much as a year—I hope it won’t be so long, of course. It’s a bore, but worth while if it means recovering. Richard is staying nearby for the summer & comes & sees me every week. He has started kindergarten school & this winter is going to the village school in Jura, I don’t know for how long. I have been thinking about Westminster for him when he is older. They have abandoned their top hats, I learn. It is a day school, which I prefer, & I think has other good points. Any way I’m going to make enquiries & put his name down if it seems suitable. Of course god
°
knows what will have happened by then, say 1956, but one has to plan as though nothing would change drastically.

Have you any news of the Empsons,
²
who were in Pekin°? I don’t know whether you knew them. There have been various rumours, & I am trying to get some news from Empson’s American publishers.

Did you read Ruth Fischer’s book
Stalin & German Communism
? She’s coming to see me tomorrow, I think.

Hope all is well & baby flourishing. Please remember me to your wife.

Yours

George

[XX, 3647, p. 137; handwritten]

1
.
The review had appeared in
The Times Literary Supplement
on 10 June 1949.

2
.
William Empson (see
11.7.43
, n. 7).

To Jordi Arquer*

22 June 1949

Cranham Lodge

Cranham

Dear Comrade,

Please forgive me for writing in English. Very many thanks for sending the press-cuttings.

I am & have been for a long time seriously ill with tuberculosis, & the doctors forbid me to do any work for a time to come, possibly as long as a year. In connection with the Federacion Española de Internados y Deportados, therefore, I cannot give more than my nominal support. If you wish merely to use my
name
, you are at liberty to do so, & I could manage a small subscription, say £10,
¹
if you can indicate someone in England where I can pay
it to. But I cannot do any work such as writing letters, organising, speaking, etc. I am sorry, but I must try to recover from this disease, & the only way of doing so is to rest. I imagine that I shall not even be allowed to leave my bed for some months to come.