Devil in the Delta (6 page)

I felt it simply had to be this or—to be blunt—he was faking it for whatever reason: attention, insanity, or drug/alcohol influence. Either way, I planned to directly confront him regarding the situation. I would not have him upsetting my chances of performing a thorough and extensive investigation of the property. If he would be unable to control himself in this regard, he would simply have to leave the property for the duration of my visit (once I had finished interviewing him, of course).

I was also disturbed by the fact that the two young girls of the household were often present for the nightmarish activity. Julie was in her early teens, but Katie was only ten years old. This is the kind of environment that can permanently scar the psyche of a young person, and I did not want either of the children to be present during my investigation of the trailer.

Though removing the young girls could possibly risk taking the “battery” for the phenomena out of the equation (most paranormal investigators believe poltergeists happen in the households of young girls because spirits tap them for their prepubescent energy), I did not want to risk any harm to them mentally or physically.

I had little to no time to fully research the specifics of the case, but I thought it best to at least brush up on the basics of demonic infestation and poltergeist activity before driving down to the home the following day. After all, it's better to be prepared than caught off guard, right?

Possession and Demonic Infestation

I can still remember reading the books
The Devil in Connecticut
,
The Haunted,
and
In a
Dark Place
when I was young. All three books were written by different authors, but they all featured cases that were investigated by the infamous husband and wife team of Ed and Lorraine Warren. But, more importantly, all three books scared me to death!

Unlike most paranormal investigations of today, the Warrens' cases seemed to almost always spin off into
the realm of the demonic. These stories were as frightening as they were entertaining—but when I read these books today, though, I'm amazed at how much of the reported activity in the cases falls under the simple heading of “haunting.” But, then this is just
my
opinion.

During a paranormal investigation, the opinions concerning the activity at a location often influence how a case is ultimately judged. And so it was that the Warrens labeled many of the activities detailed in their cases as being signs of demonic infestation. They believed that the events were of a diabolical nature, so their remedies for coping with the paranormal activity were usually of a religious nature.

In the book
The Haunted
by Robert Curran, the Warrens are quoted describing the four stages of demonic infestation: Infestation, Oppression, Possession, and Death. Of these stages, the hardest to quantify would be the first two. This is because the things that are often cited as signs of infestation are also usually associated with simple hauntings: knocks/raps on the walls, objects moving of their own accord, disembodied voices, etc. And “oppression” has as much to do with the psychological state of the inhabitants of a haunted house as it does with the paranormal activity there. Let me explain …

Let's say, for example, that the aforementioned elements of infestation were happening in a house inhabited by a paranormal enthusiast. In that instance, the inhabitant would be elated at the apparent activity in the household, as well as be thrilled at the prospect of possibly encountering a ghost. So, clearly, this person would not be oppressed in any way.

Conversely, if an inhabitant is terrified by the possibility of a ghost pulling at their bed sheets during the night or speaking into their ear, that individual could definitely feel a bit oppressed by the goings-on in their property without ever really experiencing anything specifically of a demonic
nature. When people are frightened, they often jump to the worst possible conclusion—and, so, a ghost suddenly becomes a demon.

As for the third stage of demonic infestation, possession, you really have to realize how murky these waters truly are. Every year, scores of folks from all over the world report being possessed by demons. The vast majority of these turn out to either be frauds, sufferers of a mental disorder, or a hysterical ultrareligious individual who is misinterpreting what's going on around them. Don't believe me? Just check out any of the books by Gabriele Amorth, the official exorcist to the diocese of Rome. He lists many of these cases, as well as cites examples of the rare, real thing.

When the movie
The Exorcist
first hit the movie screens in 1974, it not only terrified thousands of moviegoers, it also spawned an epidemic of sudden possession cases all over the world.

In an article titled “
Behavior: Exorcist Fever”
in
Time
magazine, Dr. Ari Kiev (a psychiatrist at New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center) wrote, “If people are attracted to this film, then that is what is in their subconscious. Then again, many patients see themselves as the devil.”

The article also tells of the influence the film had on the public, “A prominent Midwest Catholic theologian received dozens of calls from confused people fearful that they were losing their grip on reality. A number of priests reported receiving inquiries from people who believed themselves possessed.”

So were all these people under demonic assault? It's more likely that these folks were terrified by something in their lives and were afraid of experiencing the events associated with “Regan” in the movie. Or they were simply people who wanted attention. (Hey, sometimes the obvious reason is the best.) Or maybe these individuals wanted so much to believe in the Devil (as well as God) that they subconsciously
wanted
to be possessed in a way that would provide them with a form of proof that their religion is valid. This line of thinking, in my opinion, could also be applied to the Warren cases.

Were the Warrens simply investigating haunted houses, but their own belief system dictated that they label the affairs as being “demonic?” Maybe. I don't know. I wasn't there. But this could certainly be a possibility. One thing can generally be agreed upon, though:
something
was happening in those cases and evidence needed to be gathered—regardless of the viewpoint of
what
was going on. Looking at the Martin case, I was confronted with the same challenges. Of course there is also the fourth stage of demonic infestation to contend with as well: Death.

Though somebody dying from possession is extremely rare, it has happened. One such case was highlighted in the case and movie titled
The Exorcism of Emily Rose
. The film was based on a real case that happened in Germany in the 1970s.

A young girl by the name of Anneliese Michel was reportedly possessed and underwent a series of intense exorcisms that resulted in her death. Two of the priests involved with the exorcism, as well as the girl's parents, were held accountable for the death and were convicted of negligent manslaughter.

Later it would be revealed that Anneliese was previously diagnosed with mental illness and even suffered a form of epilepsy, so many have questioned whether or not she was, indeed, ever actually possessed. And, unfortunately, though many of the details of the ordeal can be debated, one thing is certain: Anneliese did die.

While researching the particulars of demonic attack, I came across an interesting article written by Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted for
The Catholic Sun
titled “
Year for Priests: St. John Vianney, Part Two: The Devil's Attack
.” In the article, Bishop Olmsted details the demonic harassment that Father John Vianney experienced during his priesthood.

Olmsted states, “In addition to … ordinary ploys, demons resort to other extraordinary acts, on rare occasions, with the same intention of thwarting the plan of God and undercutting our filial trust in Him. These harassments can be of three kinds: infestations, possessions, and obsessions.”

Olmsted goes on to detail events that occur during infestation—things like noises, cries, bangs/rattles, and the appearance of apparitions. These were things all reported in the Martin home. Of course, I was already aware of the implications of infestation and possession. It was the second type of activity mentioned by Olmsted, obsession, that caught my eye the most.

Obsession: Part Two

Ever since the first paranormal investigator set foot in the first haunted place, there has been the fear of obsession. This fear, basically put, is that by constantly exposing oneself to the paranormal, as well as studying it and reading about it, one can actually attract spirits and entities. It's thought by many in the paranormal community that the simple act of “obsessing” about the dead can actually cause a person to eventually be visited by such.

Over the years, many researchers have supported this theory by writing about personal experiences while being involved with a haunting—or when investigating paranormal activity. These are experiences that occur in their own homes after returning there from investigating particularly horrific places. While it seems the stuff of horror movies, it does seem to happen on occasion and it can be a negative aspect of becoming a paranormal investigator. In addition, obsession is often reported by investigators in another form as well …

If you investigate the paranormal for any amount of time, you will begin to run into a certain type of client: people who seem to
want to be haunted
. These individuals often watch ghost programs, read books about hauntings, and sometimes even participate in various types of séances and other activities that seem geared toward communicating with the dead.

If the concept of obsession is a valid one, then these particular people may actually be causing their own haunting by actively obsessing over the subject. And if the ghost enthusiasts are bad about this, then imagine how it can be with an overly zealous religious person. How many times a day would that person think about the Devil and/or demons? Or dwell on the subject of evil?

Could an extreme amount of concern about spirits and demons actually cause a place to become infested? Or, worse yet, cause a person to become possessed? Many believe so. Olmsted writes, “With obsession, the Devil goes beyond infestations and actually plays on the external senses of the body or influences a person's memory or imagination.” Think about that for a moment …

For example, let's say you see a dark shadow move strangely. Because you are already afraid of demonic infestation—and are possibly dwelling on the subject a bit too much—your memory of the shadow slowly changes. With time, your memory/imagination will begin to tell you that what you actually saw was the manifestation of something demonic or ghostly.

Multiply this event times a hundred in one home and you can see why obsession can be a dangerous thing. Even if no entity was “attracted” by all this attention, the act of obsession could certainly cause a person to become paranoid and emotionally wrecked.

Knowing all of this, it would be important for me to gauge how tuned in to the paranormal, and possibly demonic subjects, the Martin family was. Maybe their interest in these subjects was affecting how they were looking at the activity, or perceived activity, in their environment. And I would have to do this without actually bringing up those subjects myself …

Past experience dealing with religious households and their hauntings has taught me to steer clear of any religious suggestions of activity. This is because it can cause investigations to go down strange paths—paths that usually involve clergy and religious ritual.

So I would cautiously avoid bringing up any subject related to demons, exorcism, or infestation with the Martin family. I did not want to have to deal with any requests of performing an exorcism, deliverance, or clearing on my first visit—and, more to the point, I did not want to affect what they would tell me firsthand about what was happening in the home.

Avoiding the subject of the demonic would prove to be no challenge, though, since I only worked with the scientific method. Besides, looking at all the reported activity in the home, there was a lot more happening with this case than is typically associated with infestation. Much of the Martin family's paranormal activity seemed to fall under the heading of “poltergeist.”

Elements of a Poltergeist

Usually when the word “poltergeist” is brought into play, yet another movie springs to mind. Though less influential on the psyche of the public than
The Exorcist
, the film has, unfortunately, led a lot of people astray in what they tend to associate with this phenomenon.

Besides the most obvious non-truths (trees snatching kids through windows, clown dolls attacking people, spirits speaking through the television, etc.), the biggest fallacy is perhaps the presence of a ghost at all. These days, most researchers believe that a poltergeist event—often dubbed “PK” by the paranormal community—has more to do with the psychokinetic ability (to move objects solely by mental effort) of an individual than it does with any spirit.

Typically, when a paranormal case is labeled as being a poltergeist, there seems to be a person who lives in the environment that serves as a sort of catalyst to the events happening around them. Sometimes, by simply being present, activity seems to generate around these individuals—though activity is not always limited to this circumstance.