Authors: L.C. Tyler
She was looking at me oddly, as well she might. Perhaps Elsie was right. There had been no reason at all for me to visit Emma. She had told me nothing that she wouldn’t have told me on the phone. I had only succeeded in making Emma think I was slightly weird. There was little doubt that, the more she thought about my two visits, the more inexplicable they would become in the context of normal human behaviour. And all for nothing.
‘Just one other thing,’ I said as I gathered the three volumes together. ‘Why did you suspect Crispin was seeing somebody else?’
‘Oh, that’s easy,’ she said. ‘Henry Holiday phoned me up and told me.’
‘I’m not interrupting anything?’
‘No,’ said Elsie.
‘It isn’t biscuit time?’
‘Not quite, but thank you for the reminder. You have my full attention.’
‘I’ve just got back from Brighton.’
‘But that’s
much
too early. It’s scarcely seven minutes to biscuit time.’
‘I know what time it is.’
‘If you’re going to spend the night with somebody you have to stay where you are. You can’t just keep bouncing backwards and forwards across Sussex.’
‘I’m not going to spend the night with anyone.’
‘Did you make a clumsy and ineffective pass at her, after which she told you to piss off back where you came from?’
‘That has nothing to do with you.’
‘I thought so. Well, it’s clearly too late to phone for my advice now.’
‘That’s not what I want your advice on. Emma Vynall had a row with her husband after she’d been tipped off he was having a relationship with somebody.’
‘Crispin was always having a relationship with somebody.’
‘Yes, but guess who the tip-off came from?’
‘Her best friend?’
‘Henry Holiday.’
‘Henry didn’t think to mention that to you?’
‘No.’
‘Of course, he may not be proud of snitching on Crispin.’
‘No.’
‘But didn’t you say that Emma hardly knew Henry?’
‘She said she’d talked to him once or twice.’
‘Well, if one of those occasions was when he phoned her with the glad tidings …’
‘His act of kindness wasn’t inspired by his close friendship with Emma Vynall.’
‘In which case,’ said Elsie, ‘he must have hated Crispin Vynall’s guts big time.’
‘Yes,’ I said.
‘Or Emma’s lying,’ said Elsie. ‘Maybe there’s something between Emma and Henry.’
‘I don’t think so,’ I said. ‘She said she hardly knew him.’
‘Ethelred,’ said Elsie. ‘Basic lesson in human nature for you. It is perfectly possible for a beautiful woman with access to blonde hair dye to tell the occasional fib. You
may find it difficult to believe, but it happens. Think back to your first wife.’
‘My only wife,’ I said.
‘That’s true. Why do I think of you as having a string of failed marriages?’
I wondered if I should explain to Elsie that I did not regard my marriage to Geraldine as a complete failure and that we had both enjoyed several happy years together. It was true that she had never shared my interest in crime fiction and I had never shared her interest in shagging my best friend, but in other respects we were as compatible as most couples are. But Elsie’s agile mind had moved on.
‘OK, let’s go with your theory that blondes never lie. That means that Henry hated Crispin? Why? Could Crispin have been slagging him off on the Internet, not as Thrillseeker but under some other
nom de sockpuppet
?’
‘Possibly. But you still have to ask why?’
‘I did. I asked it a moment ago. Still, here we go again: why?’
‘I don’t know. It’s like a badly constructed novel. Everything slightly askew. Nothing quite fitting together.’
‘Yes, you said that before.’
‘Yes, but I’ve thought about it since then. What if this whole thing is some fiction dreamt up by Crispin? What if he wants us to think he’s vanished and that something terrible has happened to him? So he dreams up this scheme by which he can slip away unnoticed on New Year’s Eve, leaving Henry looking as if he’s a murderer? Then he plants all sorts of clues along the way.’
‘Why Henry?’
‘I don’t know – but there’s clearly bad blood there of some sort.’
‘OK, but if that’s true, why text Henry to tell him that he’s alive and well?’
‘That’s what I mean. The plot is full of inconsistencies.’
‘It doesn’t sound like a Crispin Vynall novel, then. Say what you like, he can put a plot together. More like one of your own novels, when you think about it.’
‘That’s a little harsh,’ I said.
‘Not according to Thrillseeker.’
‘You mean according to Crispin,’ I said. ‘What now?’
‘Biscuit time!’ Elsie announced.
‘Is it?’
‘It is in Hampstead.’
‘I see.’
‘I’ll call you tomorrow,’ said Elsie. ‘It’s possible I may have some answers for you by then, though it’s equally possible that I won’t.’
‘OK,’ I said.
‘Jaffa Cakes or Jammy Dodgers?’ she added. But I don’t think she was talking to me.
‘I’ve just got back from Emma Vynall’s,’ I said to Henry.
‘You’ve been there
again
?’ There was more than a little concern in his voice.
‘There were other questions I wanted to ask her.’
‘You could have phoned her. You’re phoning me,’ said Henry.
‘I might not have discovered what I discovered.’
‘Which was …?’
‘Henry, why did you tell Emma that Crispin was
sleeping with a friend of hers? That’s why Crispin walked out. They had an argument over it – except it wasn’t even true. It was just something you had invented.’
There was a long pause.
‘Is that what Emma said?’
‘I’d scarcely be making it up. Why did you do it?’
Another pause.
‘I didn’t.’
‘She says you did.’
‘Ethelred, you must have seen how she’s drinking these days? She always did put it away, but she must be on a couple of bottles a day now.’
‘I suppose so.’
‘She gets a bit … well, confused. She hardly knows where she is sometimes. You must have noticed that?’
‘So you didn’t phone her?’
‘No, I did phone. Of course I did. It was between Christmas and New Year. I’d been talking to Crispin about New Year’s Eve. He’d mentioned that he and Emma had had a row and she’d pretty much thrown him out.’
‘I thought you said you hadn’t talked to Crispin about that.’
‘I didn’t talk to him on New Year’s Eve about it. This was a few days before. Anyway, it was clear that he wasn’t going to contact Emma, so I did – just to say that he was safe, and that she shouldn’t worry. She was very, very drunk that evening and it took a while for me to get the message across.
She
kept telling
me
that Crispin was having a relationship with a friend of hers – not the other way round. I wasn’t that interested, to tell you the truth. I just wanted her to understand that everything was OK. I obviously failed miserably.’
‘Henry, you and Crispin were on good terms – right up to the last time you saw him?’
‘Yes, of course.’
‘You remember this reviewer, Thrillseeker, who was giving me so many one-star reviews on Amazon?’
‘Was that his name?’
‘It turns out he was Crispin.’
‘Crispin was giving you one-star reviews under an alias?’
‘Yes.’
‘What did you say he was calling himself?’
‘Thrillseeker.’
‘Why?’
‘It’s just how the Internet works. People use these aliases.’
‘Gosh! So, how did you work it out?’
‘He gave himself away in a discussion group – he forgot he’d signed in under that alias. He said “I” when he should have said “he”.’
‘That’s impressive detection work.’
‘I wondered … if he’d done the same thing to you?’
‘I hardly ever read reviews for my own books on Amazon, so I’ve no idea. You’ll have to show me how it all works – how you do reviews online.’
‘Yes, OK. Thanks for your own review of my books, by the way – the one in the
Telegraph
, I mean. I thought you had some really interesting things to say about the way my books have developed since—’
‘Yes, of course. Glad you liked it. I’ve got to go now, Ethelred. Let me know if you come up with anything else.’
‘Well …’ I said. I had planned to tell him that Crispin’s text message had really been for him. But I was beginning to wonder if that was so. If Crispin was indeed out there pulling the strings, maybe it had been intended for me all along. Maybe I was being drip-fed information as and when Crispin thought I needed to have it and for reasons I did not understand.
I might have asked Henry what he thought of that theory. But he had long since hung up.
From the journal of Elsie Thirkettle
Ethelred was right, of course. His marriage to Geraldine had been inexplicably happy. He must have been aware that she was playing away, but he somehow managed to disregard it, the way an oyster coats a bit of grit with nacre until it is in possession of a pearl. Of course, the pearl is sod-all use to the oyster, but there’s a limit to what can be done with analogy, metaphor, simile and all the other crap writers use. My point is simply that Ethelred has a great but little used capacity to be genuinely happy. He wasn’t always the morose git that he is now. He says so himself. He tells me I’d be amazed how much he enjoyed life in the old days before I knew him.
I’ve had a theory for a long time about Ethelred’s love life. I sometimes think that he feels he doesn’t deserve to be happy. Maybe he reckons he let Geraldine down in some way – that if he’d been a better husband she
wouldn’t have needed anyone else. Maybe he reckons he let himself down – that he should have done more to keep her than just saying: ‘are you absolutely sure about that?’ when she said she was leaving. These days he has the same relationship with love that a bulimic teenager does with food. He’ll bolt it down, but half an hour later he’s throwing it all up again and looking sorry for himself.
Or, if that’s overanalysing things a bit, let’s just say he’s a dickhead.
It was the relationship between Henry and the Vynall family that was really starting to interest me, though. If Ethelred fancied Emma, then why shouldn’t Henry do the same? Of course, Emma was too old for him, but then so were his bow ties and waistcoats. I could see Henry getting a bit of a crush on her the same way as Ethelred, and maybe feeling protective towards her, the same way that Ethelred usually felt about this or that bitch who wanted to get her claws into him. The difference was that Henry would actually notice that Crispin was not treating the lady right.
I also still wondered if Crispin was reviewing Henry under a different alias. I decided to check Henry’s reviews and see if there were any patterns there and – hey, what do you know? – there were no trolls after him but he had an admirer. Somebody calling themselves Sussexreader thought he was brill.
Here’s an example of what Sussexreader thought of one of Henry’s books, and posted only a day or so ago:
Henry Holiday is emerging as one of the most exciting talents of his generation of crime writers. With an older cohort of authors nolonger delivering
the goods, young wordsmiths such as Holiday are stepping up to the mark in what is rightly being described as a new Golden Age of crime. Though he has been compared to Crispin Vynall, Holiday’s work actually has much greater depth and subtlety. The characterisation in his novels is excellent. In this book, the complex relationship between the young artist, Zak Holbein, and his mentor is carefully delineated. The murder of the mentor, skilfully described in just the right amount of detail, sets off a chain of events that drags Zak into a world of gangs, drug dealing and prostitution. Katja, the drug baron’s daughter and Zak’s ally, is as brilliantly drawn as any character I can think of in any book in the past twenty years.
And so on and blah-de-blah-de-blah. There were ten reviews in all – much the same as the one above. Sussexreader, a bit like Thrillseeker, seemed to concentrate mainly on one single writer he admired, though that is not completely unknown on Amazon. I checked his reviews for other writers. Nothing for Ethelred, good or bad. Nothing for Crispin Vynall. A couple of nice five-star reviews for Peter James and one each for Peter Lovesey, Joan Moules and Simon Brett, all Sussex-based, suggesting that Sussexreader took the ‘Sussex’ bit of his alias seriously and also read widely within the genre. Everything suggested he was knowledgeable and literate.
Yet there was something about them that was vaguely familiar – as if I’d read the guy’s work before.
I needed to talk to somebody who knew Crispin well,
and I doubted that I could pitch up on Emma’s doorstep with a copy of
Murderous Hampstead
(say) and hope to question her without her suspecting anything. Who else would know him well, I wondered?
That’s why I have just phoned Mary Devlin Jones, and arranged to meet her in Holborn tomorrow morning.
Extract from a tape recording. The two people whose voices feature on the tape would appear to be Elsie Thirkettle (ET) and Mary Devlin Jones (MDJ). Diary entries point to the date being on or about 10 January. The background noise and the opening conversation suggest a cafe.
MDJ : | … that you have there? |
| |
ET : | No. Absolutely not. |
| |
MDJ : | I could have sworn that I saw a tape recorder in your bag when you leant across to it. |
| |
ET : | Oh, that. You mean the tape recorder in my bag . |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. |
| |
ET : | That tape recorder … |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. |
| |
ET : | I brought it along because I need to record an interview later with one of my writers. |
| |
MDJ : | But you didn’t just switch it on? |
| |
ET : | No. |
| |
MDJ : | OK. Because, if you had, it would be a bit weird. |
| |
ET : | Right. Definitely. So, I think that’s everything. Your skinny latte. My hot chocolate with whipped cream and more chocolate on top. Biscuits. Do you think we need more biscuits? |
| |
MDJ : | I’m good. |
| |
ET : | Morally or biscuit-wise? Ha, ha! |
| |
MDJ : | Just biscuit-wise. Thank you. |
| |
ET : | Don’t mention it. |
| |
MDJ : | It was great to hear from you out of the blue. Obviously I’m very pleased you wanted to meet up, since I’ve just left my last agent. |
| |
ET : | Yes, I’d heard that. I’ve always been a great admirer of your writing, Mary. Could you just talk me through what you’ve done? |
| |
MDJ : | But you’ve read the books, obviously? |
| |
ET : | Obviously. Still, talk me through it, anyway. |
| |
MDJ : | Well, Blood on the Cutting Room Floor was the first. |
| |
ET : | That’s the one that won the CWA New Writing Award? |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. They only ran that particular competition for a couple of years, so I was lucky to make it. I first got the idea for it … |
| |
ET : | The book was described as … [rustling of papers] … a fine debut, very much in the style of Stuart McBride and Crispin Vynall. |
| |
MDJ : | Is that Marcel Berlins in The Times ? |
| |
ET : | Yes. Very much in the style of Crispin Vynall, he says … |
| |
MDJ : | And Stuart McBride. |
| |
ET : | But also Crispin Vynall. |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. That’s what the review says. Both of those writers. |
| |
ET : | You knew Crispin quite well in those days. The two of you were pretty close? |
| |
MDJ : | Close? Oh, I get it. It’s back to this business that Crispin wrote the bloody thing for me, isn’t it? Is somebody spreading rumours again? I honestly thought I was free of that crap now. Jeez, some people must have very little to do. |
| |
ET : | So, he didn’t write it? |
| |
MDJ : | Are you sure that tape recorder is off? I think I can see a red light. Or are you running a micro-brothel in your handbag? |
| |
ET : | Ha, ha! |
| |
MDJ : | So is it turned on? |
| |
ET : | Ha, ha! |
| |
MDJ : | Meaning it is? |
| |
ET : | Absolutely not. |
| |
MDJ : | [uncertainly] OK. Whatever. |
| |
ET : | So, did he give you any help? You and he were a bit of an item … I mean, I can see how it might happen. Innocently. Was the book really one hundred per cent yours? |
| |
MDJ : | I can’t believe you asked me that question. Do I actually have to give you an answer? |
| |
ET : | That’s why I asked the question. |
| |
MDJ : | OK, I can see that, if you are going to be my agent, we need to clear one or two things up. It got in the way of my relationship with my last agent, to be perfectly honest. |
| |
ET : | Your last agent being … |
| |
MDJ : | Janet Francis. |
| |
ET : | The same agent as Crispin? |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. |
| |
ET : | Just a thought – she wasn’t jealous of you and Crispin? I mean, she didn’t fancy Crispin herself? |
| |
MDJ : | I don’t think so. I mean, she’s much too old for him. |
| |
ET : | She’d be about the same age as he is. |
| |
MDJ : | That’s what I mean. |
| |
ET : | So it was just the whole plagiarism thing, then, that caused the problems between you and Janet? |
| |
MDJ : | Except there wasn’t any plagiarism. Let’s just get this over, shall we? If it helps at all, I admit it – I mean the infatuated with Crispin Vynall bit. In those days what I was writing was very much Vynall pastiche – a bit the way Henry Holiday now writes Vynall pastiche, only with decent plots. I admired the bloody man – Crispin, I mean. I thought he was the cat’s bollocks. I tried to imitate him. It’s not that surprising that he liked it as a judge for that competition. I had a bit of an inside track, you might say. And he helped me edit it before it went to the publisher – I didn’t have an agent until Crispin introduced me to his – but that was all . It was my bloody book, OK? Sorry, did I splash you with that coffee? |
| |
ET : | Only a bit. Maybe if you didn’t wave your cup around like that … |
| |
MDJ : | Sorry. |
| |
ET : | But after the book came out. You and Crispin saw a lot of each other? |
| |
MDJ : | I’m really, really sorry. I’ll pay for the dry-cleaning if you like. Shall I get some more paper napkins for you? |
| |
ET : | No, I’m good. But I mean, why not go out with him? The fact that he’s married apart, of course. I’ll grant you he’s got a few wrinkles, but he has money and he has influence. |
| |
MDJ : | True. I suppose that’s a good summary of why I slept with him. But it had no connection with the prize . I won that fair and square. |
| |
ET : | Of course you did. |
| |
MDJ : | I did discuss the second book with him. A bit. But his suggestions were … well, odd. He thought I should introduce elements of the supernatural – cross-over horror and crime thriller. And I did try, but it never felt comfortable. That’s probably why that one never really worked out. I don’t think he wanted the second book to be a success, to be quite honest. He wanted a dutiful handmaiden, not a competitor. |
| |
ET : | Then he dumped you. |
| |
MDJ : | As he had dumped others in the past. One of these days somebody’s going to bump him off, just like one of the characters from his books. |
| |
ET : | One day? |
| |
MDJ : | Well, at some point in the future. I can’t be more specific than that. |
| |
ET : | He’s alive and well now? |
| |
MDJ : | As far as I know. I haven’t actually seen him since last June, but I’d have heard if something had happened … or do you mean …? |
| |
ET : | No. I don’t mean anything. But you’re certain you haven’t killed him? |
| |
MDJ : | Only fictionally. |
| |
ET : | Book three. |
| |
MDJ : | Yes, he was in that, thinly disguised. It’s the way we writers get revenge. It’s not much, but it’s better than nothing. Crispin said he sometimes did the same thing in his books – a thinly disguised caricature of somebody he disliked, clearly identifiable for those who knew, but always just on the right side of libel. |
| |
ET : | He did a few of those? |
| |
MDJ : | So he said. |
| |
ET : | And they’d have upset people? |
| |
MDJ : | That was the plan. |
| |
ET : | Can you remember any names? |
| |
MDJ : | He was always a bit cagey about that for obvious reasons. I know the ineffectual blackmailer in his third book was supposed to be Johnny Rayne.’ |
| |
ET : | His agent before he signed up with Janet Francis? |
| |
MDJ : | Yes. |
| |
ET : | He died of a heart attack last year, so it can’t be him. |
| |
MDJ : | Can’t have been him doing what? |
| |
ET : | Nothing. Nothing at all. Who is Crispin seeing now? |
| |
MDJ : | In addition to his wife? Or doesn’t that count? |
| |
ET : | They seem to have split up. |
| |
MDJ : | Wow! I didn’t see that one coming. She finally gave him the push? Good for her. |
| |
ET : | So I heard. Who was he consorting with at Bristol last year? |
| |
MDJ : | Nobody really. I mean, all sorts of things go on at conferences like that, but nobody likes to make it too obvious with their agents and publishers and readers all hanging around. You never know who’s going to tweet a photo of you chatting in some cosy corner. One moment nobody knows, the next it’s gone to 10,000 followers, and that’s before the re-tweets. Betrayal’s no longer the polite, leisurely thing it once was. Since you ask, however, I did see him in the bar quite a lot with a Swedish writer – Elisabeth Söderling? But I wouldn’t want to spread gossip. There may have been nothing in it. That’s Söderling with a couple of dots above the O. |