emphasis on the orifices, and stories of dismemberment are all representations of the body as interacting with the world, not self-enclosed as the classical body:
|
| | All these convexities and orifices have a common characteristic; it is within them that the confines between bodies and between the body and the world are overcome: there is an interchange and an interorientation. This is why the main events in the life of the grotesque body, the acts of the bodily drama, take place in this sphere. Eating, drinking, defecation and other elimination (sweating, blowing of the nose, sneezing), as well as copulation, pregnancy, dismemberment, swallowing up by another bodyall these acts are performed on the confines of the body and the outer world, or on the confines of the old and new body. In all of these events the beginning and end of life are closely linked and interwoven.
|
| | (Bakhtin 1984, 317)
|
Not surprisingly, the grotesque cultural tradition manifests remarkable ambivalence on this aspect of the body. The opposing principles of corporeal fecundity and corporeal degradation in illness and death are one of the sources of that ambivalence, and they are powerfully animated in the talmudic story. Images of decay, dismemberment, and bodily mortification pervade the story.
|
The rabbi performs a bizarre purity test on himself. In order to demonstrate that his actions with regard to the Jew that he sent to his death were righteous ones, he attempts to prove (to himself) that his body is indeed a classical, impermeable one. He begins by making the claim that since he is so certain that he is righteous, he is equally sure that his body will be impervious to the depredations of worms after his death. That is, he experiences himself as a classical body, pristine and closed off from the outside world. Ironically, the test that the rabbi devises in order to prove his self-image is precisely one that undermines it. He has the integrity of his body violated even in his lifetime in the bizarre operation of removing basketsful of fat from his stomach and having them placed in the sun to see if they will, indeed, be immune from rotting. We have, then, a fantastically sardonic moment of the very apotheosis of the grotesque being claimed as a proof for the classic!
|
As Bakhtin has already pointed out, the image of the body part grown out of all proportion is "actually a picture of dismemberment, of separate areas of the body enlarged to gigantic dimensions" (328). The rabbi is
|
|
|