A Time to Kill (62 page)
“What did he tell you?”
“Initially, not much. But with time, he opened up and explained how he inspected the courthouse three days before the shooting and picked a good place to attack.”
“What about the shootings?”
“He never told me much about the actual killings. Said he didn’t remember much, but I suspect otherwise.”
Jake sprang to his feet. “Objection! The witness can only testify as to what he actually knows. He cannot speculate.”
“Sustained. Please continue, Mr. Buckley.”
“What else did you observe concerning his mood, attitude, and manner of speech?”
Rodeheaver crossed his legs and rocked gently. He lowered his eyebrows in deep thought. “Initially, he was distrustful of me and had difficulty looking me in
the eye. He gave short answers to my questions. He was very resentful of the fact that he was guarded and sometimes handcuffed while at our facility. He questioned the padded walls. But after a while, he opened up and talked freely about most everything. He flatly refused to answer a few questions, but other than that I would say he was fairly cooperative.”
“When and where did you examine him again?”
“The next day, same place.”
“What was his mood and attitude?”
“About the same as the day before. Cool at first, but he opened up eventually. He discussed basically the same topics as the day before.”
“How long did this examination last?”
“Approximately four hours.”
Buckley reviewed something on a legal pad, then whispered to Musgrove. “Now, Dr. Rodeheaver, as a result of your examinations of Mr. Hailey on June 19 and 20, were you able to arrive at a medical diagnosis of the defendant’s psychiatric condition on those dates?”
“Yes, sir.”
“And what is that diagnosis?”
“On June 19 and 20, Mr. Hailey appeared to be of sound mind. Perfectly normal, I would say.”
“Thank you. Based on your examinations, were you able to arrive at a diagnosis of Mr. Hailey’s mental condition on the day he shot Billy Ray Cobb and Pete Willard?”
“Yes.”
“And what is that diagnosis?”
“At that time his mental condition was sound, no defects of any nature.”
“Upon what factors do you base this?”
Rodeheaver turned to the jury and became a professor. “You must look at the level of premeditation
involved in this crime. Motive is an element of premeditation. He certainly had a motive for doing what he did, and his mental condition at that time did not prevent him from entertaining the requisite premeditation. Frankly, Mr. Hailey carefully planned what he did.”
“Doctor, you are familiar with the M’Naghten Rule as a test for criminal responsibility?”
“Certainly.”
“And you are aware that another psychiatrist, a Dr. W.T. Bass, has told this jury that Mr. Hailey was incapable of knowing the difference between right and wrong, and, further, that he was unable to understand and appreciate the nature and quality of his actions.”
“Yes, I am aware of that.”
“Do you agree with that testimony?”
“No. I find it preposterous, and I am personally offended by it. Mr. Hailey himself has testified he planned the murders. He’s admitted, in effect, that his mental condition at the time did not prevent him from possessing the ability to plan. That’s called premeditation in every legal and medical book. I’ve never heard of someone planning a murder, admitting he planned it, then claiming he did not know what he was doing. It’s absurd.”
At that moment, Jake felt it was absurd too, and as it echoed around the courtroom it sounded mighty absurd. Rodeheaver sounded good and infinitely credible. Jake thought of Bass and cursed to himself.
Lucien sat with the blacks and agreed with every word of Rodeheaver’s testimony. When compared to Bass, the State’s doctor was terribly believable. Lucien ignored the jury box. From time to time he would cut his eyes without moving his head and catch Clyde Sisco blatantly and openly staring directly at him. But
Lucien would not allow their eyes to meet. The messenger had not called Monday morning as instructed. An affirmative nod or wink from Lucien would consummate the deal, with payment to be arranged later, after the verdict. Sisco knew the rules, and he watched for an answer. There was none. Lucien wanted to discuss it with Jake.
“Now, Doctor, based upon these factors and your diagnosis of his mental condition as of May 20, do you have an opinion, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, as to whether Mr. Hailey was capable of knowing the difference between right and wrong when he shot Billy Ray Cobb, Pete Willard, and Deputy DeWayne Looney?”
“I have.”
“And what is that opinion?”
“His mental condition was sound, and he was very capable of distinguishing right from wrong.”
“And do you have an opinion, based upon the same factors, as to whether Mr. Hailey was able to understand and appreciate the nature and quality of his actions?”
“I have.”
“And what is that opinion?”
“That he fully appreciated what he was doing.”
Buckley snatched his legal pad and bowed politely. “Thank you, Doctor. I have no further questions.”
“Any cross-examination, Mr. Brigance?” Noose asked.
“Just a few questions.”
“I thought so. Let’s take a fifteen-minute recess.”
Jake ignored Carl Lee, and moved quickly out of the courtroom, up the stairs, and into the law library on the third floor. Harry Rex was waiting, and smiling.
“Relax, Jake. I’ve called every newspaper in North Carolina, and there’s no story about the house. There’s nothing about Row Ark. The Raleigh morning paper ran a story about the trial, but it was in real general terms. Nothing else. Carla doesn’t know about it, Jake. As far as she knows, her pretty little landmark is still standing. Isn’t that great?”
“Wonderful. Just wonderful. Thanks, Harry Rex.”
“Don’t mention it. Look, Jake, I sorta hate to bring this up.”
“I can’t wait.”
“You know I hate Buckley. Hate him worse than you do. But me and Musgrove get along okay. I can talk to Musgrove. I was thinking last night that it might be a good idea to approach them—me through Musgrove—and explore the possibilities of a plea bargain.”
“No!”
“Listen, Jake. What harm will it do? None! If you can plead him guilty to murder with no gas chamber, then you know you have saved his life.”
“No!”
“Look, Jake. Your man is about forty-eight hours away from a death penalty conviction. If you don’t believe that, then you’re blind, Jake. My blind friend.”
“Why should Buckley cut a deal? He’s got us on the ropes.”
“Maybe he won’t. But let me at least find out.”
“No, Harry Rex. Forget it.”
________
Rodeheaver returned to his seat after the recess, and Jake looked at him from behind the podium. In his brief legal career, he had never won an argument, in court or out, with an expert witness. And the way his
luck was running, he decided not to argue with this one.
“Dr. Rodeheaver, psychiatry is the study of the human mind, is it not?”
“It is.”
“And it is an inexact science at best, is it not?”
“That is correct.”
“You might examine a person and reach a diagnosis, and the next psychiatrist might reach a completely different diagnosis?”
“That’s possible, yes.”
“In fact, you could have ten psychiatrists examine a mental patient, and arrive at ten different opinions about what’s wrong with the patient.”
“That’s unlikely.”
“But it could happen, couldn’t it, Doctor?”
“Yes, it could. Just like legal opinions, I guess.”
“But we’re not dealing with legal opinions in this case, are we, Doctor?”
“No.”
“The truth is, Doctor, in many cases psychiatry cannot tell us what is wrong with a person’s mind?”
“That is true.”
“And psychiatrists disagree all the time, don’t they, Doctor?”
“Of course.”
“Now, who do you work for, Doctor?”
“The State of Mississippi.”
“And for how long?”
“Eleven years.”
“And who is prosecuting Mr. Hailey?”
“The State of Mississippi.”
“During your eleven-year career with the State, how many times have you testified in trials where the insanity defense was used?”
Rodeheaver thought for a moment. “I think this is my forty-third trial.”
Jake checked something in a file and eyed the doctor with a nasty little smile. “Are you sure it’s not your forty-sixth?”
“It could be, yes. I’m not certain.”
The courtroom became still. Buckley and Musgrove hovered over their legal pads, but watched their witness carefully.
“Forty-six times you’ve testified for the State in insanity trials?”
“If you say so.”
“And forty-six times you’ve testified that the defendant was not legally insane. Correct, Doctor?”
“I’m not sure.”
“Well, let me make it simple. You’ve testified forty-six times, and forty-six times it has been your opinion the defendant was not legally insane. Correct?”
Rodeheaver squirmed just a little, and a hint of discomfort broke around his eyes. “I’m not sure.”
“You’ve never seen a legally insane criminal defendant, have you, Doctor?”
“Of course I have.”
“Good. Would you then, please, sir, tell us the name of the defendant and where he was tried?”
Buckley rose and buttoned his coat. “Your Honor, the State objects to these questions. Dr. Rodeheaver cannot be required to remember the names and places of the trials he has testified in.”
“Overruled. Sit down. Answer the question, Doctor.”
Rodeheaver breathed deeply and studied the ceiling. Jake glanced at the jurors. They were awake and waiting on an answer.
“I can’t remember,” he finally said.
Jake lifted a thick stack of papers and waved it at the witness. “Could it be, Doctor, that the reason you can’t remember is that in eleven years, forty-six trials, you have never testified in favor of the defendant?”
“I honestly can’t remember.”
“Can you honestly name us one trial in which you found the defendant to be legally insane?”
“I’m sure there are some.”
“Yes or no, Doctor. One trial?”
The expert looked briefly at the D.A. “No. My memory fails me. I cannot at this time.”
Jake walked slowly to the defense table and picked up a thick file.
“Dr. Rodeheaver, do you recall testifying in the trial of a man by the name of Danny Booker in McMurphy County in December of 1975? A rather gruesome double homicide?”
“Yes, I recall that trial.”
“And you testified to the effect that he was not legally insane, did you not?”
“That is correct.”
“Do you recall how many psychiatrists testified in his behalf?”
“Not exactly. There were several.”
“Do the names Noel McClacky, M.D.; O.G. McGuire, M.D.; and Lou Watson, M.D., ring a bell?”
“Yes.”
“They’re all psychiatrists, aren’t they?”
“Yes.”
“They’re all qualified, aren’t they?”
“Yes.”
“And they all examined Mr. Booker and testified at trial that in their opinions the poor man was legally insane?”
“That’s correct.”
“And you testified he was not legally insane?”
“That’s correct.”
“How many other doctors supported your position?”
“None, that I recall.”
“So it was three against one?”
“Yes, but I’m still convinced I was right.”
“I see. What did the jury do, Doctor?”
“He, uh, was found not guilty by reason of insanity.”
“Thank you. Now, Dr. Rodeheaver, you’re the head doctor at Whitfield, aren’t you?”
“Yes, so to speak.”
“Are you directly or indirectly responsible for the treatment of every patient at Whitfield?”
“I’m directly responsible, Mr. Brigance. I may not personally see every patient, but their doctors are under my supervision.”
“Thank you. Doctor, where is Danny Booker today?”
Rodeheaver shot a desperate look at Buckley, and immediately covered it with a warm, relaxed grin for the jury. He hesitated for a few seconds, then hesitated one second too long.
“He’s at Whitfield, isn’t he?” Jake asked in a tone of voice that informed everyone that the answer was yes.
“I believe so,” Rodeheaver said.
“So, he’s directly under your care, then, Doctor?”
“I suppose.”
“And what is his diagnosis, Doctor?”
“I really don’t know. I have a lot of patients and—”
“Paranoid schizophrenic?”
“It’s possible, yes.”
Jake walked backward and sat on the railing. He
turned up the volume. “Now, Doctor, I want to make this clear for the jury. In 1975 you testified that Danny Booker was legally sane and understood exactly what he was doing when he committed his crime, and the jury disagreed with you and found him not guilty, and since that time he has been a patient in your hospital, under your supervision, and treated by you as a paranoid schizophrenic. Is that correct?”
The smirk on Rodeheaver’s face informed the jury that it was indeed correct.
Jake picked up another piece of paper and seemed to review it. “Do you recall testifying in the trial of a man by the name of Adam Couch in Dupree County in May of 1977?”
“I remember that case.”
“It was a rape case, wasn’t it?”
“Yes.”
“And you testified on behalf of the State against Mr. Couch?”
“That’s correct.”
“And you told the jury that he was not legally insane?”
“That was my testimony.”
“Do you recall how many doctors testified on his behalf and told the jury he was a very sick man, that he was legally insane?”
“There were several.”
“Have you ever heard of the following doctors: Felix Perry, Gene Shumate, and Hobny Wicker?”
“Yes.”
“Are they all qualified psychiatrists?”
“They are.”
“And they all testified on behalf of Mr. Couch, didn’t they?”
“Yes.”
“And they all said he was legally insane, didn’t they?”
“They did.”
“And you were the only doctor in the trial who said he was not legally insane?”